Shxwelí li te shxwelítemelh xíts'etáwtxw:博物馆对土著亲属的禁锢

IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Anthropologist Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1111/aman.13966
Dylan Robinson
{"title":"Shxwelí li te shxwelítemelh xíts'etáwtxw:博物馆对土著亲属的禁锢","authors":"Dylan Robinson","doi":"10.1111/aman.13966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Across the globe, museums filled with glass and plexiglass vitrines display collections of Indigenous belongings. The typical display scenario for such belongings places them upon plinths, underneath plexiglass. These cases render the life they contain into objects of display, things to be seen but not touched. For Indigenous people, experiencing this objectifying system of display is often traumatic because that which is on display fits neither category of object nor thing. They hold life, and are beings or ancestors; they are treated as kin. Alongside the life of ancestors who take material form, thousands of Indigenous songs collected by ethnographers on wax cylinder recordings and reel-to-reel tape are similarly confined in museum collections. These songs also hold life, but of different kinds from their material cousins. To reassess the role of the museum as a place that confines life is to put into question its relationship to incarceration. If the museum is a carceral space, how then, might we define repatriation alongside practices of “reentry” and kinship reconnection?</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 2","pages":"233-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shxwelí li te shxwelítemelh xíts'etáwtxw: The museum's confinement of Indigenous kin\",\"authors\":\"Dylan Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aman.13966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Across the globe, museums filled with glass and plexiglass vitrines display collections of Indigenous belongings. The typical display scenario for such belongings places them upon plinths, underneath plexiglass. These cases render the life they contain into objects of display, things to be seen but not touched. For Indigenous people, experiencing this objectifying system of display is often traumatic because that which is on display fits neither category of object nor thing. They hold life, and are beings or ancestors; they are treated as kin. Alongside the life of ancestors who take material form, thousands of Indigenous songs collected by ethnographers on wax cylinder recordings and reel-to-reel tape are similarly confined in museum collections. These songs also hold life, but of different kinds from their material cousins. To reassess the role of the museum as a place that confines life is to put into question its relationship to incarceration. If the museum is a carceral space, how then, might we define repatriation alongside practices of “reentry” and kinship reconnection?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Anthropologist\",\"volume\":\"126 2\",\"pages\":\"233-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Anthropologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.13966\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.13966","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球各地,博物馆里摆满了玻璃和有机玻璃玻璃橱,展示着土著人的收藏品。展示这些物品的典型方式是将它们放在有机玻璃下面的基座上。这些陈列柜将它们所承载的生命变成了展示品,只可意会不可言传。对土著人来说,经历这种物化的展示系统往往会造成创伤,因为被展示的物品既不属于物品,也不属于事物。它们拥有生命,是生命或祖先;它们被视为亲属。除了以物质形式存在的祖先的生命之外,民族学家用蜡筒录音和卷轴录音带收集的成千上万首土著歌曲也同样被博物馆收藏。这些歌曲也蕴含着生命,但与它们的物质形式不同。重新评估博物馆作为禁锢生命之地的角色,就是质疑博物馆与监禁的关系。如果博物馆是一个监禁空间,那么我们该如何定义 "归还 "与 "重返 "和亲缘关系重新连接的实践呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shxwelí li te shxwelítemelh xíts'etáwtxw: The museum's confinement of Indigenous kin

Across the globe, museums filled with glass and plexiglass vitrines display collections of Indigenous belongings. The typical display scenario for such belongings places them upon plinths, underneath plexiglass. These cases render the life they contain into objects of display, things to be seen but not touched. For Indigenous people, experiencing this objectifying system of display is often traumatic because that which is on display fits neither category of object nor thing. They hold life, and are beings or ancestors; they are treated as kin. Alongside the life of ancestors who take material form, thousands of Indigenous songs collected by ethnographers on wax cylinder recordings and reel-to-reel tape are similarly confined in museum collections. These songs also hold life, but of different kinds from their material cousins. To reassess the role of the museum as a place that confines life is to put into question its relationship to incarceration. If the museum is a carceral space, how then, might we define repatriation alongside practices of “reentry” and kinship reconnection?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Anthropologist
American Anthropologist ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: American Anthropologist is the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, reaching well over 12,000 readers with each issue. The journal advances the Association mission through publishing articles that add to, integrate, synthesize, and interpret anthropological knowledge; commentaries and essays on issues of importance to the discipline; and reviews of books, films, sound recordings and exhibits.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Toward an anthropology that cares: Lessons from the Academic Carework project Parenting and the production of ethnographic knowledge Why I quit and why I stay Paul Edward Farmer (1959–2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1