用于点对点落地贷款预测的不平衡数据过度采样技术比较研究

Rini Muzayanah, Apri Dwi Lestari, Jumanto Jumanto, Budi Prasetiyo, Dwika Ananda Agustina Pertiwi, M. A. Muslim
{"title":"用于点对点落地贷款预测的不平衡数据过度采样技术比较研究","authors":"Rini Muzayanah, Apri Dwi Lestari, Jumanto Jumanto, Budi Prasetiyo, Dwika Ananda Agustina Pertiwi, M. A. Muslim","doi":"10.15294/sji.v11i1.50274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Data imbalances that often occur in the classification of loan data on the Peer-to-Peer Lending platform cancause algorithm performance to be less than optimal, causing the resulting accuracy to decrease. To overcome thisproblem, appropriate resampling techniques are needed so that the classification algorithm can work optimally andprovide results with optimal accuracy. This research aims to find the right resampling technique to overcome theproblem of data imbalance in data lending on peer-to-peer landing platforms.Methods: This study uses the XGBoost classification algorithm to evaluate and compare the resampling techniquesused. The resampling techniques that will be compared in this research include SMOTE, ADACYN, Border Line, andRandom Oversampling.Results: The highest training accuracy was achieved by the combination of the XGBoost model with the Boerder Lineresampling technique with a training accuracy of 0.99988 and the combination of the XGBoost model with the SMOTEresampling technique. In accuracy testing, the combination with the highest accuracy score was achieved by acombination of the XGBoost model with the SMOTE resampling technique.Novelty: It is hoped that from this research we can find the most suitable resampling technique combined with theXGBoost sorting algorithm to overcome the problem of unbalanced data in uploading data on peer-to-peer lendingplatforms so that the sorting algorithm can work optimally and produce optimal accuracy.","PeriodicalId":30781,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Informatics","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Imbalanced Data Oversampling Techniques for Peer-to-Peer Landing Loan Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Rini Muzayanah, Apri Dwi Lestari, Jumanto Jumanto, Budi Prasetiyo, Dwika Ananda Agustina Pertiwi, M. A. Muslim\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/sji.v11i1.50274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Data imbalances that often occur in the classification of loan data on the Peer-to-Peer Lending platform cancause algorithm performance to be less than optimal, causing the resulting accuracy to decrease. To overcome thisproblem, appropriate resampling techniques are needed so that the classification algorithm can work optimally andprovide results with optimal accuracy. This research aims to find the right resampling technique to overcome theproblem of data imbalance in data lending on peer-to-peer landing platforms.Methods: This study uses the XGBoost classification algorithm to evaluate and compare the resampling techniquesused. The resampling techniques that will be compared in this research include SMOTE, ADACYN, Border Line, andRandom Oversampling.Results: The highest training accuracy was achieved by the combination of the XGBoost model with the Boerder Lineresampling technique with a training accuracy of 0.99988 and the combination of the XGBoost model with the SMOTEresampling technique. In accuracy testing, the combination with the highest accuracy score was achieved by acombination of the XGBoost model with the SMOTE resampling technique.Novelty: It is hoped that from this research we can find the most suitable resampling technique combined with theXGBoost sorting algorithm to overcome the problem of unbalanced data in uploading data on peer-to-peer lendingplatforms so that the sorting algorithm can work optimally and produce optimal accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Journal of Informatics\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Journal of Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v11i1.50274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v11i1.50274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在对点对点借贷平台上的贷款数据进行分类时,经常会出现数据不平衡的情况,这会导致算法性能达不到最佳状态,从而导致准确率下降。为了解决这个问题,需要采用适当的重采样技术,使分类算法能以最佳方式运行,并提供具有最佳准确性的结果。本研究旨在找到合适的重采样技术,以克服点对点登陆平台数据借贷中的数据不平衡问题:本研究使用 XGBoost 分类算法来评估和比较所使用的重采样技术。本研究将比较的重采样技术包括 SMOTE、ADACYN、边界线和随机过度采样:将 XGBoost 模型与 Boerder Liner 采样技术相结合,训练精度达到 0.99988;将 XGBoost 模型与 SMOTE 采样技术相结合,训练精度达到最高。在精度测试中,XGBoost 模型与 SMOTE 重采样技术的组合获得了最高的精度分数。新颖性:希望通过这项研究,我们可以找到最合适的重采样技术与 XGBoost 排序算法相结合,以克服点对点借贷平台上传数据时数据不平衡的问题,从而使排序算法能够以最佳方式运行,并产生最佳精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study of Imbalanced Data Oversampling Techniques for Peer-to-Peer Landing Loan Prediction
Purpose: Data imbalances that often occur in the classification of loan data on the Peer-to-Peer Lending platform cancause algorithm performance to be less than optimal, causing the resulting accuracy to decrease. To overcome thisproblem, appropriate resampling techniques are needed so that the classification algorithm can work optimally andprovide results with optimal accuracy. This research aims to find the right resampling technique to overcome theproblem of data imbalance in data lending on peer-to-peer landing platforms.Methods: This study uses the XGBoost classification algorithm to evaluate and compare the resampling techniquesused. The resampling techniques that will be compared in this research include SMOTE, ADACYN, Border Line, andRandom Oversampling.Results: The highest training accuracy was achieved by the combination of the XGBoost model with the Boerder Lineresampling technique with a training accuracy of 0.99988 and the combination of the XGBoost model with the SMOTEresampling technique. In accuracy testing, the combination with the highest accuracy score was achieved by acombination of the XGBoost model with the SMOTE resampling technique.Novelty: It is hoped that from this research we can find the most suitable resampling technique combined with theXGBoost sorting algorithm to overcome the problem of unbalanced data in uploading data on peer-to-peer lendingplatforms so that the sorting algorithm can work optimally and produce optimal accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Random Forest and Double Random Forest Models from View Points of Their Interpretability Comparative Analysis of LSTM Neural Network and SVM for USD Exchange Rate Prediction: A Study on Different Training Data Scenarios Knowledge Discovery from Confusion Matrix of Pruned CART in Imbalanced Microarray Data Ovarian Cancer Classification Comparison of Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine on Mixed Categorical and Continuous Independent Variables for COVID-19 Patients Data The Comparison of K-Nearest Neighbors and Random Forest Algorithm to Recognize Indonesian Sign Language in a Real-Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1