亚里士多德的差异

{"title":"亚里士多德的差异","authors":"","doi":"10.5092/jhna.2024.16.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay revisits one of the most acclaimed paintings of Rembrandt van Rijn’s later years, Aristotle with the Bust of Homer (1654; The Metropolitan Museum of Art). The painter’s approach to the subject of this work owes much to visual precedents and to the reception of Aristotle among early modern men of letters, including within the intellectual circles of seventeenth-century Holland. The unusual appearance of the philosopher, which has often led to conflicting interpretations, becomes much clearer when considered against the long-standing perception of his cultural “otherness.” The stance and gesture of this Aristotle not only affirm his identity but point to key aspects of his epistemology, focusing on the role of touch as the first step toward knowledge.","PeriodicalId":104162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aristotle’s Difference\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.5092/jhna.2024.16.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay revisits one of the most acclaimed paintings of Rembrandt van Rijn’s later years, Aristotle with the Bust of Homer (1654; The Metropolitan Museum of Art). The painter’s approach to the subject of this work owes much to visual precedents and to the reception of Aristotle among early modern men of letters, including within the intellectual circles of seventeenth-century Holland. The unusual appearance of the philosopher, which has often led to conflicting interpretations, becomes much clearer when considered against the long-standing perception of his cultural “otherness.” The stance and gesture of this Aristotle not only affirm his identity but point to key aspects of his epistemology, focusing on the role of touch as the first step toward knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2024.16.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5092/jhna.2024.16.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章重温了伦勃朗-凡-里恩晚年最受赞誉的画作之一《亚里士多德与荷马半身像》(1654 年;大都会艺术博物馆)。画家对这幅作品主题的处理方式在很大程度上得益于视觉先例以及现代早期文人对亚里士多德的接受,包括 17 世纪荷兰知识界对亚里士多德的接受。这位哲学家不寻常的外表常常导致相互矛盾的解释,而当考虑到长期以来人们对其文化 "异类 "的看法时,这种不寻常的外表就变得更加清晰了。这位亚里士多德的姿态和姿态不仅肯定了他的身份,还指出了他认识论的关键方面,重点是触摸作为通向知识的第一步的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aristotle’s Difference
This essay revisits one of the most acclaimed paintings of Rembrandt van Rijn’s later years, Aristotle with the Bust of Homer (1654; The Metropolitan Museum of Art). The painter’s approach to the subject of this work owes much to visual precedents and to the reception of Aristotle among early modern men of letters, including within the intellectual circles of seventeenth-century Holland. The unusual appearance of the philosopher, which has often led to conflicting interpretations, becomes much clearer when considered against the long-standing perception of his cultural “otherness.” The stance and gesture of this Aristotle not only affirm his identity but point to key aspects of his epistemology, focusing on the role of touch as the first step toward knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Netherlandish Paintings as Devotional Objects: State of Research ca. 1990-2020 Courtly Experiments: Early Portrait Etchings by Lucas van Leyden and Jan Gossart Editors' Greeting Mute Painting: Deafness and Speechlessness in the Theory and Historiography of Dutch Art Aristotle’s Difference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1