慢性乙型肝炎患者使用富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯和替诺福韦阿拉非那胺与骨质疏松症相关医疗费用的关系:韩国一项基于人口的全国队列研究

You Ran Noh, Hae Sun Suh
{"title":"慢性乙型肝炎患者使用富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯和替诺福韦阿拉非那胺与骨质疏松症相关医疗费用的关系:韩国一项基于人口的全国队列研究","authors":"You Ran Noh, Hae Sun Suh","doi":"10.17480/psk.2024.68.1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long-term administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may lead to bone mineral density loss. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) developed to address these concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether there is a significant difference in osteoporosis-related healthcare costs between CHB patients treated with TDF and TAF. This study is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) covering the entire population in Korea. The cohort included CHB patients treated with TDF or TAF from November 2017 to April 2022. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics observed for one-year preceding prescription date. Osteoporosis-related costs per patient per year (PPPY) included all healthcare costs with an osteoporosis diagnosis code including outpatient and hospitalization costs. 7,172 and 3,837 patients were administered TDF and TAF respectively. After IPTW, TDF group had higher outpatient costs ($11.2) compared to TAF group ($6.1), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.1001). The total hospitalization cost was $24.6 in TDF group and $9.8 in TAF group, not statistically significant (p=0.1633). This largescale population-based study found no significant difference in osteoporosis-related healthcare costs between CHB patients treated with TDF and TAF.","PeriodicalId":23923,"journal":{"name":"Yakhak Hoeji","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Osteoporosis-related Healthcare Costs with the Use of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: a Population-based National Cohort Study in Korea\",\"authors\":\"You Ran Noh, Hae Sun Suh\",\"doi\":\"10.17480/psk.2024.68.1.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Long-term administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may lead to bone mineral density loss. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) developed to address these concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether there is a significant difference in osteoporosis-related healthcare costs between CHB patients treated with TDF and TAF. This study is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) covering the entire population in Korea. The cohort included CHB patients treated with TDF or TAF from November 2017 to April 2022. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics observed for one-year preceding prescription date. Osteoporosis-related costs per patient per year (PPPY) included all healthcare costs with an osteoporosis diagnosis code including outpatient and hospitalization costs. 7,172 and 3,837 patients were administered TDF and TAF respectively. After IPTW, TDF group had higher outpatient costs ($11.2) compared to TAF group ($6.1), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.1001). The total hospitalization cost was $24.6 in TDF group and $9.8 in TAF group, not statistically significant (p=0.1633). This largescale population-based study found no significant difference in osteoporosis-related healthcare costs between CHB patients treated with TDF and TAF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yakhak Hoeji\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yakhak Hoeji\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17480/psk.2024.68.1.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yakhak Hoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17480/psk.2024.68.1.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期服用富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)可能会导致骨矿物质密度下降。为了解决这些问题,开发了替诺福韦-阿拉非那胺(TAF)。本研究旨在调查接受 TDF 和 TAF 治疗的慢性乙型肝炎患者在骨质疏松症相关医疗费用方面是否存在显著差异。本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了健康保险审查和评估服务(HIRA)中涵盖韩国全部人口的索赔数据。队列包括2017年11月至2022年4月期间接受TDF或TAF治疗的CHB患者。我们采用逆治疗概率加权法(IPTW)来平衡处方日期前一年观察到的基线特征。每名患者每年的骨质疏松症相关费用(PPPY)包括所有带有骨质疏松症诊断代码的医疗费用,包括门诊和住院费用。分别有 7172 名和 3837 名患者接受了 TDF 和 TAF 治疗。IPTW后,TDF组的门诊费用(11.2美元)高于TAF组(6.1美元),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.1001)。TDF组的住院总费用为24.6美元,TAF组为9.8美元,差异无统计学意义(P=0.1633)。这项大规模人群研究发现,接受 TDF 和 TAF 治疗的慢性乙型肝炎患者在骨质疏松症相关医疗费用方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Osteoporosis-related Healthcare Costs with the Use of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: a Population-based National Cohort Study in Korea
Long-term administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may lead to bone mineral density loss. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) developed to address these concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether there is a significant difference in osteoporosis-related healthcare costs between CHB patients treated with TDF and TAF. This study is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) covering the entire population in Korea. The cohort included CHB patients treated with TDF or TAF from November 2017 to April 2022. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics observed for one-year preceding prescription date. Osteoporosis-related costs per patient per year (PPPY) included all healthcare costs with an osteoporosis diagnosis code including outpatient and hospitalization costs. 7,172 and 3,837 patients were administered TDF and TAF respectively. After IPTW, TDF group had higher outpatient costs ($11.2) compared to TAF group ($6.1), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.1001). The total hospitalization cost was $24.6 in TDF group and $9.8 in TAF group, not statistically significant (p=0.1633). This largescale population-based study found no significant difference in osteoporosis-related healthcare costs between CHB patients treated with TDF and TAF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Osteoporosis-related Healthcare Costs with the Use of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: a Population-based National Cohort Study in Korea Comparative Review of Added Health Benefits of the Drugs Listed through Economic Evaluation Exemption Procedure in Korea: Cases of France, Germany, and Canada Korean Elderly’s Demand for Supplying Elderly-friendly Dosage Forms Easy to Swallow The Societal/economical Impact of Trastuzumab-deruxtecan in Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Recent Issues and Regulatory Requirements of Data Integrity in Pharmaceutical Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1