欧盟内部的跨国婚姻

Q3 Social Sciences Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.20318/cdt.2024.8429
Silvia Marino, Javier Carrascosa González
{"title":"欧盟内部的跨国婚姻","authors":"Silvia Marino, Javier Carrascosa González","doi":"10.20318/cdt.2024.8429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper tackles the issue of the recognition of cross-border marriages and their effects within the European Union. The current praxis allows interesting remarks on the cross-border effects of foreign marriages and their recognition in the perspective of the rights to free movement and to family life. In this framework, the paper scrutinizes a potential definition of the marriage, whether according to EU free movement law or to European human rights law. Due to the lack of a commonly accepted definition, it tests the classic approach to the circulation of foreign documents and certificates, i.e. the conflict of laws perspective. Leading on, it analyses the more fashionable method of the mutual recognition of situations created abroad, as modelled by some States and tested in some cases by the European Courts, too. Despite important advantages, this method does not seem easily accepted for the circulation of the status of spouse(s) and of the institution of marriage. With the aim to push towards enhanced free movement rights and strengthened human rights, the present paper offers some final remarks regarding the legal value of (international) family law in the framework of a social Constitution of the EU.","PeriodicalId":36196,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional","volume":"67 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marriages across borders within the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Marino, Javier Carrascosa González\",\"doi\":\"10.20318/cdt.2024.8429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper tackles the issue of the recognition of cross-border marriages and their effects within the European Union. The current praxis allows interesting remarks on the cross-border effects of foreign marriages and their recognition in the perspective of the rights to free movement and to family life. In this framework, the paper scrutinizes a potential definition of the marriage, whether according to EU free movement law or to European human rights law. Due to the lack of a commonly accepted definition, it tests the classic approach to the circulation of foreign documents and certificates, i.e. the conflict of laws perspective. Leading on, it analyses the more fashionable method of the mutual recognition of situations created abroad, as modelled by some States and tested in some cases by the European Courts, too. Despite important advantages, this method does not seem easily accepted for the circulation of the status of spouse(s) and of the institution of marriage. With the aim to push towards enhanced free movement rights and strengthened human rights, the present paper offers some final remarks regarding the legal value of (international) family law in the framework of a social Constitution of the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional\",\"volume\":\"67 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2024.8429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2024.8429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了欧盟内部承认跨国婚姻及其影响的问题。从自由迁徙权和家庭生活权的角度来看,当前的实践允许对异国婚姻的跨境影响及其承认问题进行有趣的讨论。在此框架下,本文将根据欧盟自由流动法或欧洲人权法对婚姻的潜在定义进行审查。由于缺乏公认的定义,本文对外国文件和证书流通的传统方法,即法律冲突的观点进行了检验。接着,它分析了更为时髦的相互承认在国外产生的情况的方法,一些国家以这种方法为榜样,欧洲法院也在某些情况下对其进行了检验。尽管这种方法有很多优点,但在配偶身份和婚姻制度的流通方面似乎并不容易被接受。为了推动加强自由迁徙权和人权,本文就(国际)家庭法在欧盟社会宪法框架内的法律价 值提出了一些结论性意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Marriages across borders within the European Union
The present paper tackles the issue of the recognition of cross-border marriages and their effects within the European Union. The current praxis allows interesting remarks on the cross-border effects of foreign marriages and their recognition in the perspective of the rights to free movement and to family life. In this framework, the paper scrutinizes a potential definition of the marriage, whether according to EU free movement law or to European human rights law. Due to the lack of a commonly accepted definition, it tests the classic approach to the circulation of foreign documents and certificates, i.e. the conflict of laws perspective. Leading on, it analyses the more fashionable method of the mutual recognition of situations created abroad, as modelled by some States and tested in some cases by the European Courts, too. Despite important advantages, this method does not seem easily accepted for the circulation of the status of spouse(s) and of the institution of marriage. With the aim to push towards enhanced free movement rights and strengthened human rights, the present paper offers some final remarks regarding the legal value of (international) family law in the framework of a social Constitution of the EU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
期刊最新文献
A. Durán Ayago. Derechos humanos y método de reconocimiento de situaciones jurídicas: Hacia la libre circulación de personas y familias. Perspectiva internacional y europea. I. Lorente Martinez. Daños punitivos y Derecho internacional privado La odisea judicial entre London Steam-Ship Owners-Mutual Insurance Association Limited y el Reino de España Pedro A. de Miguel Asensio. Manual de Derecho de las Nuevas Tecnologías. Derecho digital. Romero Matute, Yeray. El arbitraje internacional deportivo. La acción de nulidad, el reconocimiento y ejecución de los laudos arbitrales del CAS/TAS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1