预测心血管手术需求:机器学习模型比较研究

Arman Ghavidel, Pilar Pazos, Rolando Del Aguila Suarez, Alireza Atashi
{"title":"预测心血管手术需求:机器学习模型比较研究","authors":"Arman Ghavidel, Pilar Pazos, Rolando Del Aguila Suarez, Alireza Atashi","doi":"10.35882/jeeemi.v6i2.359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the efficacy of ensemble Machine Learning (ML) models, mainly focusing on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), in predicting the need for cardiovascular surgery, a critical aspect of clinical decision-making. It addresses key challenges such as class imbalance, which is pivotal in healthcare settings. The research involved a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the performance of previously published ML methods against a new Deep Learning (DL) model. This comparison utilized a dataset encompassing 50,000 patient records from a large hospital between 2015-2022. The study proposes enhancing the efficacy of these models through feature selection and hyperparameter optimization, employing techniques like grid search. A novel aspect of this research was the comparison of a newly developed DNN model with existing ensemble models based on similar cardiovascular datasets. The results indicated the DNN model's superior predictive accuracy, demonstrating an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 74%, alongside notable precision (68%) and recall (72%) for the minority class, which indicates patients requiring surgery. The model further achieved a 70% F1-Score and a balanced accuracy rate of 72%, significantly outperforming the existing ensemble models in every key performance metric. The study underscores the transformative potential of DNNs in predictive modeling for cardiovascular care and highlights the importance of integrating advanced ML techniques into clinical workflows. Future research should delve into the practical application and integration of these models.","PeriodicalId":369032,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the Need for Cardiovascular Surgery: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models\",\"authors\":\"Arman Ghavidel, Pilar Pazos, Rolando Del Aguila Suarez, Alireza Atashi\",\"doi\":\"10.35882/jeeemi.v6i2.359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research examines the efficacy of ensemble Machine Learning (ML) models, mainly focusing on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), in predicting the need for cardiovascular surgery, a critical aspect of clinical decision-making. It addresses key challenges such as class imbalance, which is pivotal in healthcare settings. The research involved a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the performance of previously published ML methods against a new Deep Learning (DL) model. This comparison utilized a dataset encompassing 50,000 patient records from a large hospital between 2015-2022. The study proposes enhancing the efficacy of these models through feature selection and hyperparameter optimization, employing techniques like grid search. A novel aspect of this research was the comparison of a newly developed DNN model with existing ensemble models based on similar cardiovascular datasets. The results indicated the DNN model's superior predictive accuracy, demonstrating an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 74%, alongside notable precision (68%) and recall (72%) for the minority class, which indicates patients requiring surgery. The model further achieved a 70% F1-Score and a balanced accuracy rate of 72%, significantly outperforming the existing ensemble models in every key performance metric. The study underscores the transformative potential of DNNs in predictive modeling for cardiovascular care and highlights the importance of integrating advanced ML techniques into clinical workflows. Future research should delve into the practical application and integration of these models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35882/jeeemi.v6i2.359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35882/jeeemi.v6i2.359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了集合机器学习(ML)模型(主要侧重于深度神经网络(DNN))在预测心血管手术需求(临床决策的一个重要方面)方面的功效。它解决了类不平衡等关键挑战,这在医疗保健环境中至关重要。这项研究包括对以前发布的 ML 方法与新的深度学习 (DL) 模型的性能进行全面比较和评估。该比较利用了一个数据集,其中包含一家大型医院在 2015-2022 年间的 50,000 份患者记录。研究建议通过特征选择和超参数优化,采用网格搜索等技术来提高这些模型的功效。这项研究的一个新颖之处在于将新开发的 DNN 模型与基于类似心血管数据集的现有集合模型进行了比较。结果表明,DNN 模型的预测准确性更胜一筹,其曲线下面积(AUC)达到了 74%,同时在少数类别(表示需要手术的患者)中的精确度(68%)和召回率(72%)也非常显著。该模型还取得了 70% 的 F1 分数和 72% 的平衡准确率,在每个关键性能指标上都明显优于现有的集合模型。这项研究强调了 DNN 在心血管护理预测建模中的变革潜力,并突出了将先进的 ML 技术整合到临床工作流程中的重要性。未来的研究应深入探讨这些模型的实际应用和整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting the Need for Cardiovascular Surgery: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models
This research examines the efficacy of ensemble Machine Learning (ML) models, mainly focusing on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), in predicting the need for cardiovascular surgery, a critical aspect of clinical decision-making. It addresses key challenges such as class imbalance, which is pivotal in healthcare settings. The research involved a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the performance of previously published ML methods against a new Deep Learning (DL) model. This comparison utilized a dataset encompassing 50,000 patient records from a large hospital between 2015-2022. The study proposes enhancing the efficacy of these models through feature selection and hyperparameter optimization, employing techniques like grid search. A novel aspect of this research was the comparison of a newly developed DNN model with existing ensemble models based on similar cardiovascular datasets. The results indicated the DNN model's superior predictive accuracy, demonstrating an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 74%, alongside notable precision (68%) and recall (72%) for the minority class, which indicates patients requiring surgery. The model further achieved a 70% F1-Score and a balanced accuracy rate of 72%, significantly outperforming the existing ensemble models in every key performance metric. The study underscores the transformative potential of DNNs in predictive modeling for cardiovascular care and highlights the importance of integrating advanced ML techniques into clinical workflows. Future research should delve into the practical application and integration of these models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting the Need for Cardiovascular Surgery: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models A Comparative Study of Convolutional Neural Network in Detecting Blast Cells for Diagnose Acute Myeloid Leukemia A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Baby Cry Detection Using MFCC Features Analysis of Multimodal Biosignals during Surprise Conditions Correlates with Psychological Traits Evaluation of two biometric access control systems using the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1