机器人盆腔淋巴结清扫术后处理淋巴漏时的早期引流清除术

UroPrecision Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1002/uro2.33
Wei Wang, Kai Zhang, Hongbo Li, Lihua Yuan, Yan Hou, Derek A. O'Reilly, Gang Zhu
{"title":"机器人盆腔淋巴结清扫术后处理淋巴漏时的早期引流清除术","authors":"Wei Wang, Kai Zhang, Hongbo Li, Lihua Yuan, Yan Hou, Derek A. O'Reilly, Gang Zhu","doi":"10.1002/uro2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radical prostatectomy (RP) and radical cystectomy (RC) with concurrent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are considered as the curative surgical treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PC) or muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (BC). Regarding lymphatic leakage management after PLND, there is no standard of care, with different therapeutic approaches having been reported with varying success rates.Seventy patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy during robotic RP and RC with postoperative pelvic drainage volume more than 50 mL/day before the removal of drainage tube, were retrospectively evaluated in this study between August 2015 and June 2023. If the pelvic drainage volume on postoperative Day 2 was more than 50 mL/day, a drainage fluid creatinine was routinely tested to rule out urine leakage. We removed the drainage if the patient had no significant abdominal free fluid collection, no abdominal distension or pain, no fever, and no abdominal tenderness. After 1‐day observation of the vital signs and abdominal symptoms, the patient was discharged and followed‐up in clinic for 2 weeks after surgery.Forty‐one cases underwent the early drainage removal even if the pelvic drainage volume was more than 50 mL/day. Among these forty‐one cases, twenty‐five drainage tubes were removed when drainage volume was more than 100 mL/day. All the forty‐one cases with pelvic drainage volume greater than 50 mL/day were successfully managed with the early drainage removal. No paracentesis or drainage placement was required. No re‐admission occured during the follow‐up period.It is safe to manage the high‐volume pelvic lymphatic leakage by early clamping of the drainage tube, ultrasonography assessment of no significant residual fluid in the abdominal and pelvic cavity, and then the early removal of the drainage tube.","PeriodicalId":478044,"journal":{"name":"UroPrecision","volume":"29 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early drainage removal in the management of lymphatic leakage after robotic pelvic lymph node dissection\",\"authors\":\"Wei Wang, Kai Zhang, Hongbo Li, Lihua Yuan, Yan Hou, Derek A. O'Reilly, Gang Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/uro2.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Radical prostatectomy (RP) and radical cystectomy (RC) with concurrent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are considered as the curative surgical treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PC) or muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (BC). Regarding lymphatic leakage management after PLND, there is no standard of care, with different therapeutic approaches having been reported with varying success rates.Seventy patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy during robotic RP and RC with postoperative pelvic drainage volume more than 50 mL/day before the removal of drainage tube, were retrospectively evaluated in this study between August 2015 and June 2023. If the pelvic drainage volume on postoperative Day 2 was more than 50 mL/day, a drainage fluid creatinine was routinely tested to rule out urine leakage. We removed the drainage if the patient had no significant abdominal free fluid collection, no abdominal distension or pain, no fever, and no abdominal tenderness. After 1‐day observation of the vital signs and abdominal symptoms, the patient was discharged and followed‐up in clinic for 2 weeks after surgery.Forty‐one cases underwent the early drainage removal even if the pelvic drainage volume was more than 50 mL/day. Among these forty‐one cases, twenty‐five drainage tubes were removed when drainage volume was more than 100 mL/day. All the forty‐one cases with pelvic drainage volume greater than 50 mL/day were successfully managed with the early drainage removal. No paracentesis or drainage placement was required. No re‐admission occured during the follow‐up period.It is safe to manage the high‐volume pelvic lymphatic leakage by early clamping of the drainage tube, ultrasonography assessment of no significant residual fluid in the abdominal and pelvic cavity, and then the early removal of the drainage tube.\",\"PeriodicalId\":478044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UroPrecision\",\"volume\":\"29 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UroPrecision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/uro2.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UroPrecision","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uro2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和根治性膀胱切除术(RC)同时进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)被认为是局部前列腺癌(PC)或肌浸润性膀胱癌(BC)的根治性手术治疗方案。本研究回顾性评估了 2015 年 8 月至 2023 年 6 月间接受机器人前列腺癌根治术(RP)和膀胱癌根治术(RC)盆腔淋巴结切除术的 70 例患者,这些患者在拔除引流管前的术后盆腔引流量超过 50 毫升/天。如果术后第 2 天盆腔引流量超过 50 毫升/天,则常规检测引流液肌酐以排除尿漏。如果患者没有明显的腹腔游离液积聚、没有腹胀或腹痛、没有发热、没有腹部压痛,我们就会拔除引流管。观察生命体征和腹部症状 1 天后,患者即可出院,并在术后 2 周内接受门诊随访。在这 41 个病例中,有 25 个引流管在引流量超过 100 毫升/天时被拔除。所有 41 例盆腔引流量大于 50 毫升/天的病例都成功地进行了早期引流管移除手术。无需进行旁腔穿刺或引流置管。通过早期夹闭引流管、超声波检查评估腹腔和盆腔内无明显残留液体,然后早期拔除引流管来处理大容量盆腔淋巴漏是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early drainage removal in the management of lymphatic leakage after robotic pelvic lymph node dissection
Radical prostatectomy (RP) and radical cystectomy (RC) with concurrent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are considered as the curative surgical treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PC) or muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (BC). Regarding lymphatic leakage management after PLND, there is no standard of care, with different therapeutic approaches having been reported with varying success rates.Seventy patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy during robotic RP and RC with postoperative pelvic drainage volume more than 50 mL/day before the removal of drainage tube, were retrospectively evaluated in this study between August 2015 and June 2023. If the pelvic drainage volume on postoperative Day 2 was more than 50 mL/day, a drainage fluid creatinine was routinely tested to rule out urine leakage. We removed the drainage if the patient had no significant abdominal free fluid collection, no abdominal distension or pain, no fever, and no abdominal tenderness. After 1‐day observation of the vital signs and abdominal symptoms, the patient was discharged and followed‐up in clinic for 2 weeks after surgery.Forty‐one cases underwent the early drainage removal even if the pelvic drainage volume was more than 50 mL/day. Among these forty‐one cases, twenty‐five drainage tubes were removed when drainage volume was more than 100 mL/day. All the forty‐one cases with pelvic drainage volume greater than 50 mL/day were successfully managed with the early drainage removal. No paracentesis or drainage placement was required. No re‐admission occured during the follow‐up period.It is safe to manage the high‐volume pelvic lymphatic leakage by early clamping of the drainage tube, ultrasonography assessment of no significant residual fluid in the abdominal and pelvic cavity, and then the early removal of the drainage tube.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fluorescence imaging‐guided pelvic lymph node localization and resection of bladder cancer after intracutaneous injection of indocyanine green into the lower limbs and perineum Paraganglioma in the bladder wall: A case report Qualitative analysis of online discussion boards for male urinary incontinence after prostate treatment Ventral corporal reinforcement using a pericardium allograft (Tutoplast®) in a patient undergoing urethrectomy procedure with an inflatable penile prosthesis in place: A case report Successful management of a mixed epithelial and stromal renal tumor masquerading as lower pole renal cyst: A laparoscopic deroofing approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1