I. Prepolec, V. Pašara, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanić, J. Putrić Posavec, B. Pezo Nikolić, M. Krpan, R. Matasić, M. Puljević, Martina Lovrić Benčić, D. Puljević, Davor Miličić, C. de Asmundis, G. Chierchia, G. Mugnai, V. Velagić
{"title":"心力衰竭患者对指南指导的药物治疗的依从性和植入式心律转复除颤器的早期激活:一项回顾性研究","authors":"I. Prepolec, V. Pašara, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanić, J. Putrić Posavec, B. Pezo Nikolić, M. Krpan, R. Matasić, M. Puljević, Martina Lovrić Benčić, D. Puljević, Davor Miličić, C. de Asmundis, G. Chierchia, G. Mugnai, V. Velagić","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2503075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : This study was conducted to evaluate compliance with guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) and its association with early implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods : Retrospective data from 307 patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention from 2011 to 2017 were collected and analyzed. Results : Among the study participants, only 23.8% received the maximum tolerated dose of OMT prior to ICD implantation, with 59.0% receiving all three OMT medication groups. No significant difference in OMT compliance was found between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and those with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, DCM patients received ICDs more frequently at the time of diagnosis than ICM patients (13.8% vs. 0.7%). Early ICD activation (within 3 months) occurred in only one patient who had not received appropriate OMT, representing 0.7% of all ICM patients. Furthermore, early activation was also infrequent in patients who received OMT (2.9% of ICM patients and 2.6% of DCM patients). Echocardiography follow-up data revealed that 20.4% of ICM patients and 29.8% of DCM patients who did not receive OMT before ICD implantation showed improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to 35% or more. Conclusions : This study found suboptimal compliance with OMT prior to ICD implantation in HFrEF patients. The results showed that early ICD activation was rare in all patient groups, especially those who did not receive the prescribed 3 months of OMT. More research is needed to investigate longer waiting periods for the evaluation of potential EF improvement, and to better evaluate the eligibility of HFrEF patients for ICD. The current findings have potential implications for clinical practice and patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":507771,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compliance with Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Early Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Activation in Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"I. Prepolec, V. Pašara, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanić, J. Putrić Posavec, B. Pezo Nikolić, M. Krpan, R. Matasić, M. Puljević, Martina Lovrić Benčić, D. Puljević, Davor Miličić, C. de Asmundis, G. Chierchia, G. Mugnai, V. Velagić\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2503075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : This study was conducted to evaluate compliance with guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) and its association with early implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods : Retrospective data from 307 patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention from 2011 to 2017 were collected and analyzed. Results : Among the study participants, only 23.8% received the maximum tolerated dose of OMT prior to ICD implantation, with 59.0% receiving all three OMT medication groups. No significant difference in OMT compliance was found between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and those with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, DCM patients received ICDs more frequently at the time of diagnosis than ICM patients (13.8% vs. 0.7%). Early ICD activation (within 3 months) occurred in only one patient who had not received appropriate OMT, representing 0.7% of all ICM patients. Furthermore, early activation was also infrequent in patients who received OMT (2.9% of ICM patients and 2.6% of DCM patients). Echocardiography follow-up data revealed that 20.4% of ICM patients and 29.8% of DCM patients who did not receive OMT before ICD implantation showed improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to 35% or more. Conclusions : This study found suboptimal compliance with OMT prior to ICD implantation in HFrEF patients. The results showed that early ICD activation was rare in all patient groups, especially those who did not receive the prescribed 3 months of OMT. More research is needed to investigate longer waiting periods for the evaluation of potential EF improvement, and to better evaluate the eligibility of HFrEF patients for ICD. The current findings have potential implications for clinical practice and patient outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2503075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2503075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Compliance with Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Early Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Activation in Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study
Background : This study was conducted to evaluate compliance with guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) and its association with early implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods : Retrospective data from 307 patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention from 2011 to 2017 were collected and analyzed. Results : Among the study participants, only 23.8% received the maximum tolerated dose of OMT prior to ICD implantation, with 59.0% receiving all three OMT medication groups. No significant difference in OMT compliance was found between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and those with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, DCM patients received ICDs more frequently at the time of diagnosis than ICM patients (13.8% vs. 0.7%). Early ICD activation (within 3 months) occurred in only one patient who had not received appropriate OMT, representing 0.7% of all ICM patients. Furthermore, early activation was also infrequent in patients who received OMT (2.9% of ICM patients and 2.6% of DCM patients). Echocardiography follow-up data revealed that 20.4% of ICM patients and 29.8% of DCM patients who did not receive OMT before ICD implantation showed improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to 35% or more. Conclusions : This study found suboptimal compliance with OMT prior to ICD implantation in HFrEF patients. The results showed that early ICD activation was rare in all patient groups, especially those who did not receive the prescribed 3 months of OMT. More research is needed to investigate longer waiting periods for the evaluation of potential EF improvement, and to better evaluate the eligibility of HFrEF patients for ICD. The current findings have potential implications for clinical practice and patient outcomes.