心力衰竭患者对指南指导的药物治疗的依从性和植入式心律转复除颤器的早期激活:一项回顾性研究

I. Prepolec, V. Pašara, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanić, J. Putrić Posavec, B. Pezo Nikolić, M. Krpan, R. Matasić, M. Puljević, Martina Lovrić Benčić, D. Puljević, Davor Miličić, C. de Asmundis, G. Chierchia, G. Mugnai, V. Velagić
{"title":"心力衰竭患者对指南指导的药物治疗的依从性和植入式心律转复除颤器的早期激活:一项回顾性研究","authors":"I. Prepolec, V. Pašara, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanić, J. Putrić Posavec, B. Pezo Nikolić, M. Krpan, R. Matasić, M. Puljević, Martina Lovrić Benčić, D. Puljević, Davor Miličić, C. de Asmundis, G. Chierchia, G. Mugnai, V. Velagić","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2503075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : This study was conducted to evaluate compliance with guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) and its association with early implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods : Retrospective data from 307 patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention from 2011 to 2017 were collected and analyzed. Results : Among the study participants, only 23.8% received the maximum tolerated dose of OMT prior to ICD implantation, with 59.0% receiving all three OMT medication groups. No significant difference in OMT compliance was found between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and those with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, DCM patients received ICDs more frequently at the time of diagnosis than ICM patients (13.8% vs. 0.7%). Early ICD activation (within 3 months) occurred in only one patient who had not received appropriate OMT, representing 0.7% of all ICM patients. Furthermore, early activation was also infrequent in patients who received OMT (2.9% of ICM patients and 2.6% of DCM patients). Echocardiography follow-up data revealed that 20.4% of ICM patients and 29.8% of DCM patients who did not receive OMT before ICD implantation showed improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to 35% or more. Conclusions : This study found suboptimal compliance with OMT prior to ICD implantation in HFrEF patients. The results showed that early ICD activation was rare in all patient groups, especially those who did not receive the prescribed 3 months of OMT. More research is needed to investigate longer waiting periods for the evaluation of potential EF improvement, and to better evaluate the eligibility of HFrEF patients for ICD. The current findings have potential implications for clinical practice and patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":507771,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compliance with Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Early Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Activation in Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"I. Prepolec, V. Pašara, Andrija Nekić, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanić, J. Putrić Posavec, B. Pezo Nikolić, M. Krpan, R. Matasić, M. Puljević, Martina Lovrić Benčić, D. Puljević, Davor Miličić, C. de Asmundis, G. Chierchia, G. Mugnai, V. Velagić\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2503075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : This study was conducted to evaluate compliance with guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) and its association with early implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods : Retrospective data from 307 patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention from 2011 to 2017 were collected and analyzed. Results : Among the study participants, only 23.8% received the maximum tolerated dose of OMT prior to ICD implantation, with 59.0% receiving all three OMT medication groups. No significant difference in OMT compliance was found between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and those with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, DCM patients received ICDs more frequently at the time of diagnosis than ICM patients (13.8% vs. 0.7%). Early ICD activation (within 3 months) occurred in only one patient who had not received appropriate OMT, representing 0.7% of all ICM patients. Furthermore, early activation was also infrequent in patients who received OMT (2.9% of ICM patients and 2.6% of DCM patients). Echocardiography follow-up data revealed that 20.4% of ICM patients and 29.8% of DCM patients who did not receive OMT before ICD implantation showed improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to 35% or more. Conclusions : This study found suboptimal compliance with OMT prior to ICD implantation in HFrEF patients. The results showed that early ICD activation was rare in all patient groups, especially those who did not receive the prescribed 3 months of OMT. More research is needed to investigate longer waiting periods for the evaluation of potential EF improvement, and to better evaluate the eligibility of HFrEF patients for ICD. The current findings have potential implications for clinical practice and patient outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2503075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2503075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估心力衰竭和射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者对指南指导的最佳医疗疗法(OMT)的依从性及其与植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)早期激活的关系。方法 :收集并分析2011年至2017年期间307名因一级预防而接受ICD植入术的患者的回顾性数据。结果:在研究参与者中,只有23.8%的人在植入ICD前接受了最大耐受剂量的OMT治疗,59.0%的人接受了所有三组OMT药物治疗。缺血性心肌病(ICM)患者与非缺血性扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者的OMT依从性无明显差异。然而,与 ICM 患者相比,DCM 患者在确诊时使用 ICD 的频率更高(13.8% 对 0.7%)。早期 ICD 激活(3 个月内)仅发生在一名未接受适当 OMT 的患者身上,占所有 ICM 患者的 0.7%。此外,在接受 OMT 的患者中,早期激活的情况也不常见(ICM 患者为 2.9%,DCM 患者为 2.6%)。超声心动图随访数据显示,20.4% 的 ICM 患者和 29.8% 的 DCM 患者在植入 ICD 前未接受 OMT 治疗,但他们的左心室射血分数(EF)改善至 35% 或以上。结论 :本研究发现,高频低氧血症患者在 ICD 植入前接受 OMT 的依从性并不理想。结果显示,在所有患者组中,尤其是那些未按规定接受 3 个月 OMT 的患者中,ICD 早期激活的情况很少见。需要进行更多的研究,以调查评估潜在 EF 改善的更长等待时间,并更好地评估 HFrEF 患者是否有资格接受 ICD。目前的研究结果对临床实践和患者预后具有潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compliance with Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Early Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Activation in Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study
Background : This study was conducted to evaluate compliance with guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) and its association with early implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods : Retrospective data from 307 patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention from 2011 to 2017 were collected and analyzed. Results : Among the study participants, only 23.8% received the maximum tolerated dose of OMT prior to ICD implantation, with 59.0% receiving all three OMT medication groups. No significant difference in OMT compliance was found between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and those with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, DCM patients received ICDs more frequently at the time of diagnosis than ICM patients (13.8% vs. 0.7%). Early ICD activation (within 3 months) occurred in only one patient who had not received appropriate OMT, representing 0.7% of all ICM patients. Furthermore, early activation was also infrequent in patients who received OMT (2.9% of ICM patients and 2.6% of DCM patients). Echocardiography follow-up data revealed that 20.4% of ICM patients and 29.8% of DCM patients who did not receive OMT before ICD implantation showed improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to 35% or more. Conclusions : This study found suboptimal compliance with OMT prior to ICD implantation in HFrEF patients. The results showed that early ICD activation was rare in all patient groups, especially those who did not receive the prescribed 3 months of OMT. More research is needed to investigate longer waiting periods for the evaluation of potential EF improvement, and to better evaluate the eligibility of HFrEF patients for ICD. The current findings have potential implications for clinical practice and patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 35,409 Patients Undergoing PCI versus CABG for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Diseases Papillary Muscle Maneuvers: Pathophysiology-based Approach in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Predictors and Prognostic Factors of Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction Current Antithrombotic Treatments for Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review Characteristics and Factors of 30-Day Readmissions after Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1