腕关节磁共振成像检测滑膜炎的准确性及与关节镜检查的相关性

Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1779742
Bilal Mahmood, Keith Diamond, Omri B Ayalon, N. Paksima, Steven Glickel
{"title":"腕关节磁共振成像检测滑膜炎的准确性及与关节镜检查的相关性","authors":"Bilal Mahmood, Keith Diamond, Omri B Ayalon, N. Paksima, Steven Glickel","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1779742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hypothesis Wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown excellent diagnostic accuracy in evaluating soft-tissue pathology of the wrist including ganglion cysts, ligament tears, and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) pathology. However, it is unclear how often MRI detects synovitis that is subsequently encountered during wrist arthroscopy and may be a source of pain for patients with symptoms unresponsive to conservative treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI in the detection of wrist synovitis observed intraoperatively with wrist arthroscopy.\n Materials and Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on 51 patients who underwent arthroscopy for chronic wrist pain and MRI confirmed wrist pathology that did not resolve with nonoperative treatment. Wrist arthroscopy was performed by three fellowship-trained hand surgeons. While the primary pathology like TFCC or scapholunate ligament tear was identified and treated arthroscopically, it was noted that many of the patients had concomitant synovitis observed arthroscopically that was not identified preoperatively on MRI. Therefore, the diagnosis of wrist synovitis on MRI scan was compared with the observed presence of synovitis at the time of wrist arthroscopy. Results of preoperative MRI without contrast were categorized as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative, based upon intraoperative arthroscopic findings.\n Results In total, 45/51 patients were confirmed to have dorsal and ulnar synovitis on wrist arthroscopy. MRI identified 16/51 patients as having synovitis. Of those 16 patients, 2 were false positives.\n Conclusion The results demonstrate that conventional MRI without contrast has poor diagnostic accuracy in detecting wrist synovitis. Patients with ligament or chondral pathology or no clearly identifiable pathology on MRI whose clinical symptoms persist despite conservative treatment may have underlying dorsal and ulnar wrist synovitis that is not detected on MRI. Wrist arthroscopy facilitates the identification and treatment of synovitis in patients with concomitant wrist pathology and pain refractory to nonoperative treatment. This study suggests that MRI may have a low sensitivity for identifying wrist synovitis when compared with wrist arthroscopy during the evaluation of patients presenting with wrist pain.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Wrist MRI in Detecting Synovitis and Correlation with Arthroscopy\",\"authors\":\"Bilal Mahmood, Keith Diamond, Omri B Ayalon, N. Paksima, Steven Glickel\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1779742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Hypothesis Wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown excellent diagnostic accuracy in evaluating soft-tissue pathology of the wrist including ganglion cysts, ligament tears, and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) pathology. However, it is unclear how often MRI detects synovitis that is subsequently encountered during wrist arthroscopy and may be a source of pain for patients with symptoms unresponsive to conservative treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI in the detection of wrist synovitis observed intraoperatively with wrist arthroscopy.\\n Materials and Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on 51 patients who underwent arthroscopy for chronic wrist pain and MRI confirmed wrist pathology that did not resolve with nonoperative treatment. Wrist arthroscopy was performed by three fellowship-trained hand surgeons. While the primary pathology like TFCC or scapholunate ligament tear was identified and treated arthroscopically, it was noted that many of the patients had concomitant synovitis observed arthroscopically that was not identified preoperatively on MRI. Therefore, the diagnosis of wrist synovitis on MRI scan was compared with the observed presence of synovitis at the time of wrist arthroscopy. Results of preoperative MRI without contrast were categorized as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative, based upon intraoperative arthroscopic findings.\\n Results In total, 45/51 patients were confirmed to have dorsal and ulnar synovitis on wrist arthroscopy. MRI identified 16/51 patients as having synovitis. Of those 16 patients, 2 were false positives.\\n Conclusion The results demonstrate that conventional MRI without contrast has poor diagnostic accuracy in detecting wrist synovitis. Patients with ligament or chondral pathology or no clearly identifiable pathology on MRI whose clinical symptoms persist despite conservative treatment may have underlying dorsal and ulnar wrist synovitis that is not detected on MRI. Wrist arthroscopy facilitates the identification and treatment of synovitis in patients with concomitant wrist pathology and pain refractory to nonoperative treatment. This study suggests that MRI may have a low sensitivity for identifying wrist synovitis when compared with wrist arthroscopy during the evaluation of patients presenting with wrist pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假设 腕部磁共振成像(MRI)在评估腕部软组织病变(包括神经节囊肿、韧带撕裂和三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)病变)方面显示出极佳的诊断准确性。然而,目前还不清楚核磁共振成像检测出滑膜炎的频率,这种滑膜炎随后会在腕关节镜检查中出现,并可能成为对保守治疗无反应的患者的疼痛来源。本研究旨在评估常规磁共振成像在检测腕关节镜术中观察到的腕关节滑膜炎方面的诊断准确性。材料和方法 对 51 例因慢性腕痛接受关节镜检查,且 MRI 证实腕部病变经非手术治疗无效的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。腕关节镜手术由三位接受过研究培训的手外科医生进行。虽然在关节镜下发现并治疗了 TFCC 或肩胛韧带撕裂等原发病变,但我们注意到许多患者在关节镜下观察到了术前在核磁共振成像上未发现的并发滑膜炎。因此,将核磁共振成像扫描诊断出的腕关节滑膜炎与腕关节镜检查时观察到的滑膜炎进行了比较。根据术中关节镜检查结果,将术前无对比剂磁共振成像结果分为真阳性、假阳性、真阴性和假阴性。结果 共有45/51名患者在腕关节镜检查中被证实患有背侧和尺侧滑膜炎。核磁共振成像确定 16/51 例患者患有滑膜炎。在这 16 例患者中,有 2 例为假阳性。结论 研究结果表明,不使用造影剂的传统磁共振成像在检测腕关节滑膜炎方面的诊断准确性较差。韧带或软骨病变或磁共振成像无法明确识别病变的患者,尽管接受了保守治疗,但临床症状仍持续存在,其潜在的背侧和尺侧腕关节滑膜炎可能在磁共振成像中未被检测到。腕关节镜检查有助于识别和治疗伴有腕部病变和非手术治疗难治性疼痛的患者的滑膜炎。这项研究表明,在对出现腕部疼痛的患者进行评估时,磁共振成像与腕关节镜检查相比,识别腕部滑膜炎的灵敏度可能较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Accuracy of Wrist MRI in Detecting Synovitis and Correlation with Arthroscopy
Hypothesis Wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown excellent diagnostic accuracy in evaluating soft-tissue pathology of the wrist including ganglion cysts, ligament tears, and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) pathology. However, it is unclear how often MRI detects synovitis that is subsequently encountered during wrist arthroscopy and may be a source of pain for patients with symptoms unresponsive to conservative treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI in the detection of wrist synovitis observed intraoperatively with wrist arthroscopy. Materials and Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on 51 patients who underwent arthroscopy for chronic wrist pain and MRI confirmed wrist pathology that did not resolve with nonoperative treatment. Wrist arthroscopy was performed by three fellowship-trained hand surgeons. While the primary pathology like TFCC or scapholunate ligament tear was identified and treated arthroscopically, it was noted that many of the patients had concomitant synovitis observed arthroscopically that was not identified preoperatively on MRI. Therefore, the diagnosis of wrist synovitis on MRI scan was compared with the observed presence of synovitis at the time of wrist arthroscopy. Results of preoperative MRI without contrast were categorized as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative, based upon intraoperative arthroscopic findings. Results In total, 45/51 patients were confirmed to have dorsal and ulnar synovitis on wrist arthroscopy. MRI identified 16/51 patients as having synovitis. Of those 16 patients, 2 were false positives. Conclusion The results demonstrate that conventional MRI without contrast has poor diagnostic accuracy in detecting wrist synovitis. Patients with ligament or chondral pathology or no clearly identifiable pathology on MRI whose clinical symptoms persist despite conservative treatment may have underlying dorsal and ulnar wrist synovitis that is not detected on MRI. Wrist arthroscopy facilitates the identification and treatment of synovitis in patients with concomitant wrist pathology and pain refractory to nonoperative treatment. This study suggests that MRI may have a low sensitivity for identifying wrist synovitis when compared with wrist arthroscopy during the evaluation of patients presenting with wrist pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1