Zhanhong Liu, T. Algeo, S. Arefifard, Wei Wei, Carlton Brett, E. Landing, S.M Lev
{"title":"测试寒武纪至志留纪震旦纪海域的盐度","authors":"Zhanhong Liu, T. Algeo, S. Arefifard, Wei Wei, Carlton Brett, E. Landing, S.M Lev","doi":"10.1144/jgs2023-217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Ancient epicratonic formations, which represent the bulk of pre-Jurassic sedimentary rocks, have been widely interpreted as marine deposits, but recently developed bulk-shale elemental proxies for paleo-watermass salinity (i.e., B/Ga, Sr/Ba, and S/TOC) have shown this inference to be frequently incorrect. Here, we use these proxies to test the salinity conditions of 22 representative shale and marl formations of early Cambrian to early Silurian age from five cratons (Laurentia, Avalonia, Baltica, Iran and South China) in the context of formation-specific paleogeographic and paleoclimatic reconstructions. Our dataset shows that around half of these formations were probably deposited under brackish or mixed brackish-marine conditions rather than fully marine conditions (as previously inferred), and that one of them represents a freshwater facies (previously interpreted as marine mainly on the basis of\n Cruziana\n traces). In most cases, the development of reduced-salinity conditions can be related to the coastal and/or humid climate belt setting in which the formation of interest was deposited. Our dataset also reveals systematically low Sr/Ba values (i.e., relative to modern brackish and marine facies), suggesting that seawater Sr concentrations were lower during the Early Paleozoic than in the modern. Our findings suggest that re-evaluation of the salinity characteristics of many ancient epicratonic shale and marl formations is necessary.\n \n \n Thematic collection:\n This article is part of the Chemical Evolution of the Mid-Paleozoic Earth System and Biotic Response collection available at:\n https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/chemical-evolution-of-the-mid-paleozoic-earth-system\n \n \n Supplementary material:\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7063365\n","PeriodicalId":17320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Geological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the salinity of Cambrian to Silurian epicratonic seas\",\"authors\":\"Zhanhong Liu, T. Algeo, S. Arefifard, Wei Wei, Carlton Brett, E. Landing, S.M Lev\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/jgs2023-217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Ancient epicratonic formations, which represent the bulk of pre-Jurassic sedimentary rocks, have been widely interpreted as marine deposits, but recently developed bulk-shale elemental proxies for paleo-watermass salinity (i.e., B/Ga, Sr/Ba, and S/TOC) have shown this inference to be frequently incorrect. Here, we use these proxies to test the salinity conditions of 22 representative shale and marl formations of early Cambrian to early Silurian age from five cratons (Laurentia, Avalonia, Baltica, Iran and South China) in the context of formation-specific paleogeographic and paleoclimatic reconstructions. Our dataset shows that around half of these formations were probably deposited under brackish or mixed brackish-marine conditions rather than fully marine conditions (as previously inferred), and that one of them represents a freshwater facies (previously interpreted as marine mainly on the basis of\\n Cruziana\\n traces). In most cases, the development of reduced-salinity conditions can be related to the coastal and/or humid climate belt setting in which the formation of interest was deposited. Our dataset also reveals systematically low Sr/Ba values (i.e., relative to modern brackish and marine facies), suggesting that seawater Sr concentrations were lower during the Early Paleozoic than in the modern. Our findings suggest that re-evaluation of the salinity characteristics of many ancient epicratonic shale and marl formations is necessary.\\n \\n \\n Thematic collection:\\n This article is part of the Chemical Evolution of the Mid-Paleozoic Earth System and Biotic Response collection available at:\\n https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/chemical-evolution-of-the-mid-paleozoic-earth-system\\n \\n \\n Supplementary material:\\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7063365\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":17320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Geological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Geological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2023-217\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Geological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2023-217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
古震旦系地层是侏罗纪前沉积岩的主体,被广泛解释为海相沉积,但最近开发的古水体盐度的大块页岩元素代用指标(即 B/Ga、Sr/Ba 和 S/TOC)表明这种推断经常是不正确的。在这里,我们利用这些代用指标,结合特定地层的古地理和古气候重建,测试了五个地壳(劳伦西亚、阿瓦鲁尼亚、波罗的海、伊朗和华南)22 个具有代表性的早寒武纪至早志留纪页岩和泥灰岩地层的盐度条件。我们的数据集显示,这些地层中约有一半可能是在咸水或咸海-海洋混合条件下沉积的,而不是像以前推断的那样完全是海洋条件下沉积的,其中一个地层代表了淡水层(以前主要根据克鲁兹亚纳痕迹解释为海洋层)。在大多数情况下,盐度降低条件的形成与相关地层沉积的沿海和/或潮湿气候带环境有关。我们的数据集还显示出系统性的低 Sr/Ba 值(即相对于现代咸水层和海相层而言),这表明早古生代的海水 Sr 浓度低于现代海水 Sr 浓度。我们的研究结果表明,有必要重新评估许多古震旦系页岩和泥灰岩地层的盐度特征。 专题文集:本文是中古生代地球系统化学演化与生物响应文集的一部分,可在以下网址查阅: https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/chemical-evolution-of-the-mid-paleozoic-earth-system 补充材料: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7063365
Testing the salinity of Cambrian to Silurian epicratonic seas
Ancient epicratonic formations, which represent the bulk of pre-Jurassic sedimentary rocks, have been widely interpreted as marine deposits, but recently developed bulk-shale elemental proxies for paleo-watermass salinity (i.e., B/Ga, Sr/Ba, and S/TOC) have shown this inference to be frequently incorrect. Here, we use these proxies to test the salinity conditions of 22 representative shale and marl formations of early Cambrian to early Silurian age from five cratons (Laurentia, Avalonia, Baltica, Iran and South China) in the context of formation-specific paleogeographic and paleoclimatic reconstructions. Our dataset shows that around half of these formations were probably deposited under brackish or mixed brackish-marine conditions rather than fully marine conditions (as previously inferred), and that one of them represents a freshwater facies (previously interpreted as marine mainly on the basis of
Cruziana
traces). In most cases, the development of reduced-salinity conditions can be related to the coastal and/or humid climate belt setting in which the formation of interest was deposited. Our dataset also reveals systematically low Sr/Ba values (i.e., relative to modern brackish and marine facies), suggesting that seawater Sr concentrations were lower during the Early Paleozoic than in the modern. Our findings suggest that re-evaluation of the salinity characteristics of many ancient epicratonic shale and marl formations is necessary.
Thematic collection:
This article is part of the Chemical Evolution of the Mid-Paleozoic Earth System and Biotic Response collection available at:
https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/chemical-evolution-of-the-mid-paleozoic-earth-system
Supplementary material:
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7063365
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Geological Society (JGS) is owned and published by the Geological Society of London.
JGS publishes topical, high-quality recent research across the full range of Earth Sciences. Papers are interdisciplinary in nature and emphasize the development of an understanding of fundamental geological processes. Broad interest articles that refer to regional studies, but which extend beyond their geographical context are also welcomed.
Each year JGS presents the ‘JGS Early Career Award'' for papers published in the journal, which rewards the writing of well-written, exciting papers from early career geologists.
The journal publishes research and invited review articles, discussion papers and thematic sets.