Naima Faez, Fouzia Hmami, Saïd Boujraf, W. Kojmane, Samir Atmani
{"title":"尊重新生儿睡眠-觉醒周期的做法:新生儿重症监护室干预研究","authors":"Naima Faez, Fouzia Hmami, Saïd Boujraf, W. Kojmane, Samir Atmani","doi":"10.25259/jnrp_579_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nPremature newborns are exposed to a great deal of over-stimulation, which can affect their cerebral development. For better sleep, certain practices should be recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a professional training program on the improvement of practices promoting respect for the newborn’s sleep-wake cycle.\n\n\n\nThis was an interventional study with a longitudinal, single-group, and before-and-after design. The experimental design followed a three-stage time series: Eight months before, three months after, then eight months after intervention. It targeted a comprehensive sample of 66 professionals. It took place between October 2020 and March 2022 at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Hassan II University Hospital in Fez, Morocco. It was based on an observation grid and a self-administered questionnaire, validated and tested with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.91.\n\n\n\nThe light environment showed significant differences between the 1st and 3rd step (3.3% vs. 45.0%; P = 0.02; confidence interval [CI] = 13.644–10.456) for knowledge and (13.3% vs. 78.3%; P = 0.01; CI = 14.412–10.888) for practices; the noise environment showed a positive improvement between the 2nd and 3rd intervention (31.7% vs. 41.7%; P < 0.001; CI = 5.954–2.913) for knowledge and (65.0% vs. 73.3%; P < 0.001; CI = 3.597–1.236) for practices, with an average of (8.98 ± 0.30–28.15 ± 0.48; CI = 3.806–1.094) between the 1st and 3rd step. Practices surrounding sleep and wakefulness reported significant improvement between the three periods (14.35 ± 0.22 vs. 18.10 ± 0.35 vs. 19.90 ± 0.35; P P < 0.001; CI = 4.647–2.853) for sleep and (13.25 ± 0.48 vs. 22.27 ± 0.59; P < 0.001; CI = 10.563–7.471) for wakefulness with statistically significant correlations between knowledge and practices (0.426**) for sleep and (0.606**) for wakefulness.\n\n\n\nThe study demonstrated the positive impact of this sleep management and assessment program on the development of professional skills. Its implementation requires rigorous application of developmental support strategies for individualized care in neonatology.\n","PeriodicalId":16443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices for respecting the newborn’s sleep-wake cycle: Interventional study in the neonatal intensive care unit\",\"authors\":\"Naima Faez, Fouzia Hmami, Saïd Boujraf, W. Kojmane, Samir Atmani\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/jnrp_579_2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nPremature newborns are exposed to a great deal of over-stimulation, which can affect their cerebral development. For better sleep, certain practices should be recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a professional training program on the improvement of practices promoting respect for the newborn’s sleep-wake cycle.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis was an interventional study with a longitudinal, single-group, and before-and-after design. The experimental design followed a three-stage time series: Eight months before, three months after, then eight months after intervention. It targeted a comprehensive sample of 66 professionals. It took place between October 2020 and March 2022 at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Hassan II University Hospital in Fez, Morocco. It was based on an observation grid and a self-administered questionnaire, validated and tested with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.91.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe light environment showed significant differences between the 1st and 3rd step (3.3% vs. 45.0%; P = 0.02; confidence interval [CI] = 13.644–10.456) for knowledge and (13.3% vs. 78.3%; P = 0.01; CI = 14.412–10.888) for practices; the noise environment showed a positive improvement between the 2nd and 3rd intervention (31.7% vs. 41.7%; P < 0.001; CI = 5.954–2.913) for knowledge and (65.0% vs. 73.3%; P < 0.001; CI = 3.597–1.236) for practices, with an average of (8.98 ± 0.30–28.15 ± 0.48; CI = 3.806–1.094) between the 1st and 3rd step. Practices surrounding sleep and wakefulness reported significant improvement between the three periods (14.35 ± 0.22 vs. 18.10 ± 0.35 vs. 19.90 ± 0.35; P P < 0.001; CI = 4.647–2.853) for sleep and (13.25 ± 0.48 vs. 22.27 ± 0.59; P < 0.001; CI = 10.563–7.471) for wakefulness with statistically significant correlations between knowledge and practices (0.426**) for sleep and (0.606**) for wakefulness.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe study demonstrated the positive impact of this sleep management and assessment program on the development of professional skills. Its implementation requires rigorous application of developmental support strategies for individualized care in neonatology.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_579_2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_579_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
早产新生儿会受到大量的过度刺激,这可能会影响他们的大脑发育。为了让新生儿睡得更好,我们建议采取一些措施。本研究的目的是评估专业培训计划对改善尊重新生儿睡眠-觉醒周期的做法的影响。这是一项采用纵向、单组、前后对比设计的干预性研究。实验设计遵循三个阶段的时间序列:干预前八个月、干预后三个月、干预后八个月。实验对象为 66 名专业人员的综合样本。实验于 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 3 月在摩洛哥非斯哈桑二世大学医院新生儿重症监护室进行。光环境显示,第 1 步和第 3 步之间在知识方面存在显著差异(3.3% vs. 45.0%;P = 0.02;置信区间 [CI] = 13.644-10.456),在认知方面存在显著差异(13.3% vs. 78.3%;P = 0.01;CI = 14.412-10.888)。噪音环境在第 2 次和第 3 次干预之间显示出积极的改善(31.7% vs. 41.7%;P < 0.001;CI = 5.954-2.913),而在第 1 次和第 3 次干预之间,在知识方面(65.0% vs. 73.3%;P < 0.001;CI = 3.597-1.236)和在实践方面(65.0% vs. 73.3%;P < 0.001;CI = 3.597-1.236)的平均值为(8.98 ± 0.30-28.15 ± 0.48;CI = 3.806-1.094)。与睡眠和觉醒有关的实践表明,在三个阶段之间,睡眠有了显著改善(14.35 ± 0.22 vs. 18.10 ± 0.35 vs. 19.90 ± 0.35;P P < 0.001;CI = 4.647-2.853),觉醒有了显著改善(13.25 ± 0.48 vs. 22.27 ± 0.59;P < 0.001;CI = 10.563-7.471)。研究表明,该睡眠管理和评估计划对专业技能的发展具有积极影响。该计划的实施需要在新生儿科的个性化护理中严格应用发展支持策略。
Practices for respecting the newborn’s sleep-wake cycle: Interventional study in the neonatal intensive care unit
Premature newborns are exposed to a great deal of over-stimulation, which can affect their cerebral development. For better sleep, certain practices should be recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a professional training program on the improvement of practices promoting respect for the newborn’s sleep-wake cycle.
This was an interventional study with a longitudinal, single-group, and before-and-after design. The experimental design followed a three-stage time series: Eight months before, three months after, then eight months after intervention. It targeted a comprehensive sample of 66 professionals. It took place between October 2020 and March 2022 at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Hassan II University Hospital in Fez, Morocco. It was based on an observation grid and a self-administered questionnaire, validated and tested with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.91.
The light environment showed significant differences between the 1st and 3rd step (3.3% vs. 45.0%; P = 0.02; confidence interval [CI] = 13.644–10.456) for knowledge and (13.3% vs. 78.3%; P = 0.01; CI = 14.412–10.888) for practices; the noise environment showed a positive improvement between the 2nd and 3rd intervention (31.7% vs. 41.7%; P < 0.001; CI = 5.954–2.913) for knowledge and (65.0% vs. 73.3%; P < 0.001; CI = 3.597–1.236) for practices, with an average of (8.98 ± 0.30–28.15 ± 0.48; CI = 3.806–1.094) between the 1st and 3rd step. Practices surrounding sleep and wakefulness reported significant improvement between the three periods (14.35 ± 0.22 vs. 18.10 ± 0.35 vs. 19.90 ± 0.35; P P < 0.001; CI = 4.647–2.853) for sleep and (13.25 ± 0.48 vs. 22.27 ± 0.59; P < 0.001; CI = 10.563–7.471) for wakefulness with statistically significant correlations between knowledge and practices (0.426**) for sleep and (0.606**) for wakefulness.
The study demonstrated the positive impact of this sleep management and assessment program on the development of professional skills. Its implementation requires rigorous application of developmental support strategies for individualized care in neonatology.