德国的数字化和多渠道参与:结构、方法和决定因素综述

Sarah Karic, Jan Heissler, Marie-Christin Althaus
{"title":"德国的数字化和多渠道参与:结构、方法和决定因素综述","authors":"Sarah Karic, Jan Heissler, Marie-Christin Althaus","doi":"10.14512/rur.2170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizen participation has played an increasingly relevant role in spatial planning and development aiming to shape sustainable and innovative processes since the 1970s. Nevertheless, analogue participation is associated with various problems, such as social selectivity and a loss of civic trust in administration and politics. Against this background, high expectations lie in the development of digital participation formats, which have significantly changed the participation landscape. Despite the rapid development of digital participation based on new technologies and external factors such as the Covid-19 pandemic, there is still a lack of comprehensive empirical studies on spatial patterns and determinants. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to give an overview of the patterns, methods and determinants of digital and multi-channel participation in Germany. We comprehensively investigated digital and multi-channel participation processes on the websites of German cities and districts – about 4,000 approaches in total. The results show spatial disparities in digital participation processes. While the availability of broadband internet and public debt do not significantly influence the digital participation density in districts and cities, low election turnouts go along with high densities. This suggests that the administrations are responding to political disinterest with digital participation. The results also indicate that digital participation can be less socially selective, as high shares of population without German citizenship, high migration rates and low employment rates have significant positive effects on digital participation.","PeriodicalId":507133,"journal":{"name":"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning","volume":"133 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitale und mehrkanalige Partizipation in Deutschland: Ein umfassender Überblick über Strukturen, Methoden und Determinanten\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Karic, Jan Heissler, Marie-Christin Althaus\",\"doi\":\"10.14512/rur.2170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Citizen participation has played an increasingly relevant role in spatial planning and development aiming to shape sustainable and innovative processes since the 1970s. Nevertheless, analogue participation is associated with various problems, such as social selectivity and a loss of civic trust in administration and politics. Against this background, high expectations lie in the development of digital participation formats, which have significantly changed the participation landscape. Despite the rapid development of digital participation based on new technologies and external factors such as the Covid-19 pandemic, there is still a lack of comprehensive empirical studies on spatial patterns and determinants. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to give an overview of the patterns, methods and determinants of digital and multi-channel participation in Germany. We comprehensively investigated digital and multi-channel participation processes on the websites of German cities and districts – about 4,000 approaches in total. The results show spatial disparities in digital participation processes. While the availability of broadband internet and public debt do not significantly influence the digital participation density in districts and cities, low election turnouts go along with high densities. This suggests that the administrations are responding to political disinterest with digital participation. The results also indicate that digital participation can be less socially selective, as high shares of population without German citizenship, high migration rates and low employment rates have significant positive effects on digital participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.2170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.2170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,公民参与在空间规划和发展中发挥着越来越重要的作用,旨在形成可持续的创新进程。然而,模拟参与存在各种问题,如社会选择性以及公民对行政和政治失去信任。在此背景下,人们对数字参与形式的发展寄予厚望,因为数字参与形式极大地改变了参与格局。尽管基于新技术和 Covid-19 大流行等外部因素的数字参与发展迅速,但仍然缺乏对空间模式和决定因素的全面实证研究。因此,本文旨在概述德国数字和多渠道参与的模式、方法和决定因素。我们全面调查了德国各城市和地区网站上的数字化和多渠道参与过程,共计约 4000 种方法。结果显示,数字参与过程存在空间差异。虽然宽带网络的可用性和公共债务对各区和城市的数字参与密度没有显著影响,但低选举投票率与高密度并存。这表明,政府正在通过数字参与来应对政治上的冷漠。研究结果还表明,数字化参与的社会选择性较小,因为无德国国籍人口比例高、移民率高和就业率低对数字化参与有显著的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digitale und mehrkanalige Partizipation in Deutschland: Ein umfassender Überblick über Strukturen, Methoden und Determinanten
Citizen participation has played an increasingly relevant role in spatial planning and development aiming to shape sustainable and innovative processes since the 1970s. Nevertheless, analogue participation is associated with various problems, such as social selectivity and a loss of civic trust in administration and politics. Against this background, high expectations lie in the development of digital participation formats, which have significantly changed the participation landscape. Despite the rapid development of digital participation based on new technologies and external factors such as the Covid-19 pandemic, there is still a lack of comprehensive empirical studies on spatial patterns and determinants. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to give an overview of the patterns, methods and determinants of digital and multi-channel participation in Germany. We comprehensively investigated digital and multi-channel participation processes on the websites of German cities and districts – about 4,000 approaches in total. The results show spatial disparities in digital participation processes. While the availability of broadband internet and public debt do not significantly influence the digital participation density in districts and cities, low election turnouts go along with high densities. This suggests that the administrations are responding to political disinterest with digital participation. The results also indicate that digital participation can be less socially selective, as high shares of population without German citizenship, high migration rates and low employment rates have significant positive effects on digital participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balancing, alternatives and variants in municipal planning processes: general considerations and results of an empirical analysis Mapping access to medical service provision at micro-scale: Dynamics in supply and demand in Germany Raus aus der Komfortzone: Von kohlenstoffarmen zu umweltschonenden Städten Planning problems as epistemic problems. Notes on the debate about multiple truths in planning Book review of: Affolderbach, Julia; Schulz, Christian (2024): Wirtschaftsgeographien der Nachhaltigkeit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1