Simon Stoerzer, M. Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, D. Poehnert
{"title":"淀粉类防粘剂 4DryField PH 对直肠手术后吻合口愈合的影响","authors":"Simon Stoerzer, M. Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, D. Poehnert","doi":"10.1097/io9.0000000000000013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Postoperative adhesions cause medical and socio-economic problems. 4DryField PH (4DF) is a starch-based medical product/agent with approved anti-adhesive and haemostatic effects. However, the influence on anastomotic healing has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to characterize the effects of intraoperatively applied 4DF on the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal surgery.\n \n \n \n In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study, 157 patients after rectal surgery and primary anastomosis were divided into two groups. One group received 4DF (n=57), the other was treated without 4DF application (n=100). The groups were followed up for confirmed ALs.\n \n \n \n The rate of ALs (P=0.850) proved to be comparable. Other additional outcome parameters like postoperative hospital stay (P=0.801), wound infection rate (P=0.627), re-admission rate (P=1.000), re-operation rate (P=0.533) and the 30-day mortality (P=0.463) also showed no statistically significant differences. A multivariable regression model for the complete cohort could not identify 4DF application as prognostically relevant for the development of AL, whereas rectal cancer (OR=2.660 [1.184–5.974]; P=0.018), smoking (OR=3.555 [1.326–9.533]; P=0.012), an ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score ≥3 (OR=2.894 [1.300–6.442]; P=0.009) and male sex (OR=2.411 [1.040–5.591]; P=0.040) were determined as independent risk factors.\n \n \n \n The application of 4DF in proximity to the anastomotic region after rectal surgery did not increase the risk of AL and showed no impact on other investigated outcome parameters.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the starch-based anti-adhesive agent 4DryField PH on anastomotic healing after rectal surgery\",\"authors\":\"Simon Stoerzer, M. Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, D. Poehnert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/io9.0000000000000013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Postoperative adhesions cause medical and socio-economic problems. 4DryField PH (4DF) is a starch-based medical product/agent with approved anti-adhesive and haemostatic effects. However, the influence on anastomotic healing has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to characterize the effects of intraoperatively applied 4DF on the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal surgery.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study, 157 patients after rectal surgery and primary anastomosis were divided into two groups. One group received 4DF (n=57), the other was treated without 4DF application (n=100). The groups were followed up for confirmed ALs.\\n \\n \\n \\n The rate of ALs (P=0.850) proved to be comparable. Other additional outcome parameters like postoperative hospital stay (P=0.801), wound infection rate (P=0.627), re-admission rate (P=1.000), re-operation rate (P=0.533) and the 30-day mortality (P=0.463) also showed no statistically significant differences. A multivariable regression model for the complete cohort could not identify 4DF application as prognostically relevant for the development of AL, whereas rectal cancer (OR=2.660 [1.184–5.974]; P=0.018), smoking (OR=3.555 [1.326–9.533]; P=0.012), an ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score ≥3 (OR=2.894 [1.300–6.442]; P=0.009) and male sex (OR=2.411 [1.040–5.591]; P=0.040) were determined as independent risk factors.\\n \\n \\n \\n The application of 4DF in proximity to the anastomotic region after rectal surgery did not increase the risk of AL and showed no impact on other investigated outcome parameters.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/io9.0000000000000013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/io9.0000000000000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
术后粘连会造成医疗和社会经济问题。4DryField PH(4DF)是一种以淀粉为基础的医疗产品/制剂,具有公认的抗粘连和止血效果。但其对吻合口愈合的影响尚未得到评估。因此,本研究的目的是描述术中使用 4DF 对直肠手术后吻合口漏(AL)发生率的影响。 在这项回顾性、单中心队列研究中,157 名接受过直肠手术和初次吻合术的患者被分为两组。一组接受4DF治疗(57人),另一组未接受4DF治疗(100人)。两组患者均接受了确诊 AL 的随访。 事实证明,两组的 AL 发生率(P=0.850)相当。其他结果参数,如术后住院时间(P=0.801)、伤口感染率(P=0.627)、再次入院率(P=1.000)、再次手术率(P=0.533)和 30 天死亡率(P=0.463)也没有统计学意义上的显著差异。完整队列的多变量回归模型无法确定 4DF 的应用与 AL 的发生预后相关,而直肠癌(OR=2.660 [1.184-5.974]; P=0.018)、吸烟(OR=3.555[1.326-9.533];P=0.012)、ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)评分≥3(OR=2.894[1.300-6.442];P=0.009)和男性(OR=2.411[1.040-5.591];P=0.040)被确定为独立危险因素。 直肠手术后在吻合口附近使用 4DF 不会增加 AL 的风险,对其他研究结果参数也没有影响。
Impact of the starch-based anti-adhesive agent 4DryField PH on anastomotic healing after rectal surgery
Postoperative adhesions cause medical and socio-economic problems. 4DryField PH (4DF) is a starch-based medical product/agent with approved anti-adhesive and haemostatic effects. However, the influence on anastomotic healing has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to characterize the effects of intraoperatively applied 4DF on the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal surgery.
In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study, 157 patients after rectal surgery and primary anastomosis were divided into two groups. One group received 4DF (n=57), the other was treated without 4DF application (n=100). The groups were followed up for confirmed ALs.
The rate of ALs (P=0.850) proved to be comparable. Other additional outcome parameters like postoperative hospital stay (P=0.801), wound infection rate (P=0.627), re-admission rate (P=1.000), re-operation rate (P=0.533) and the 30-day mortality (P=0.463) also showed no statistically significant differences. A multivariable regression model for the complete cohort could not identify 4DF application as prognostically relevant for the development of AL, whereas rectal cancer (OR=2.660 [1.184–5.974]; P=0.018), smoking (OR=3.555 [1.326–9.533]; P=0.012), an ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score ≥3 (OR=2.894 [1.300–6.442]; P=0.009) and male sex (OR=2.411 [1.040–5.591]; P=0.040) were determined as independent risk factors.
The application of 4DF in proximity to the anastomotic region after rectal surgery did not increase the risk of AL and showed no impact on other investigated outcome parameters.