淀粉类防粘剂 4DryField PH 对直肠手术后吻合口愈合的影响

Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1097/io9.0000000000000013
Simon Stoerzer, M. Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, D. Poehnert
{"title":"淀粉类防粘剂 4DryField PH 对直肠手术后吻合口愈合的影响","authors":"Simon Stoerzer, M. Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, D. Poehnert","doi":"10.1097/io9.0000000000000013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Postoperative adhesions cause medical and socio-economic problems. 4DryField PH (4DF) is a starch-based medical product/agent with approved anti-adhesive and haemostatic effects. However, the influence on anastomotic healing has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to characterize the effects of intraoperatively applied 4DF on the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal surgery.\n \n \n \n In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study, 157 patients after rectal surgery and primary anastomosis were divided into two groups. One group received 4DF (n=57), the other was treated without 4DF application (n=100). The groups were followed up for confirmed ALs.\n \n \n \n The rate of ALs (P=0.850) proved to be comparable. Other additional outcome parameters like postoperative hospital stay (P=0.801), wound infection rate (P=0.627), re-admission rate (P=1.000), re-operation rate (P=0.533) and the 30-day mortality (P=0.463) also showed no statistically significant differences. A multivariable regression model for the complete cohort could not identify 4DF application as prognostically relevant for the development of AL, whereas rectal cancer (OR=2.660 [1.184–5.974]; P=0.018), smoking (OR=3.555 [1.326–9.533]; P=0.012), an ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score ≥3 (OR=2.894 [1.300–6.442]; P=0.009) and male sex (OR=2.411 [1.040–5.591]; P=0.040) were determined as independent risk factors.\n \n \n \n The application of 4DF in proximity to the anastomotic region after rectal surgery did not increase the risk of AL and showed no impact on other investigated outcome parameters.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the starch-based anti-adhesive agent 4DryField PH on anastomotic healing after rectal surgery\",\"authors\":\"Simon Stoerzer, M. Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, D. Poehnert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/io9.0000000000000013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Postoperative adhesions cause medical and socio-economic problems. 4DryField PH (4DF) is a starch-based medical product/agent with approved anti-adhesive and haemostatic effects. However, the influence on anastomotic healing has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to characterize the effects of intraoperatively applied 4DF on the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal surgery.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study, 157 patients after rectal surgery and primary anastomosis were divided into two groups. One group received 4DF (n=57), the other was treated without 4DF application (n=100). The groups were followed up for confirmed ALs.\\n \\n \\n \\n The rate of ALs (P=0.850) proved to be comparable. Other additional outcome parameters like postoperative hospital stay (P=0.801), wound infection rate (P=0.627), re-admission rate (P=1.000), re-operation rate (P=0.533) and the 30-day mortality (P=0.463) also showed no statistically significant differences. A multivariable regression model for the complete cohort could not identify 4DF application as prognostically relevant for the development of AL, whereas rectal cancer (OR=2.660 [1.184–5.974]; P=0.018), smoking (OR=3.555 [1.326–9.533]; P=0.012), an ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score ≥3 (OR=2.894 [1.300–6.442]; P=0.009) and male sex (OR=2.411 [1.040–5.591]; P=0.040) were determined as independent risk factors.\\n \\n \\n \\n The application of 4DF in proximity to the anastomotic region after rectal surgery did not increase the risk of AL and showed no impact on other investigated outcome parameters.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/io9.0000000000000013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/io9.0000000000000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后粘连会造成医疗和社会经济问题。4DryField PH(4DF)是一种以淀粉为基础的医疗产品/制剂,具有公认的抗粘连和止血效果。但其对吻合口愈合的影响尚未得到评估。因此,本研究的目的是描述术中使用 4DF 对直肠手术后吻合口漏(AL)发生率的影响。 在这项回顾性、单中心队列研究中,157 名接受过直肠手术和初次吻合术的患者被分为两组。一组接受4DF治疗(57人),另一组未接受4DF治疗(100人)。两组患者均接受了确诊 AL 的随访。 事实证明,两组的 AL 发生率(P=0.850)相当。其他结果参数,如术后住院时间(P=0.801)、伤口感染率(P=0.627)、再次入院率(P=1.000)、再次手术率(P=0.533)和 30 天死亡率(P=0.463)也没有统计学意义上的显著差异。完整队列的多变量回归模型无法确定 4DF 的应用与 AL 的发生预后相关,而直肠癌(OR=2.660 [1.184-5.974]; P=0.018)、吸烟(OR=3.555[1.326-9.533];P=0.012)、ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)评分≥3(OR=2.894[1.300-6.442];P=0.009)和男性(OR=2.411[1.040-5.591];P=0.040)被确定为独立危险因素。 直肠手术后在吻合口附近使用 4DF 不会增加 AL 的风险,对其他研究结果参数也没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Impact of the starch-based anti-adhesive agent 4DryField PH on anastomotic healing after rectal surgery
Postoperative adhesions cause medical and socio-economic problems. 4DryField PH (4DF) is a starch-based medical product/agent with approved anti-adhesive and haemostatic effects. However, the influence on anastomotic healing has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to characterize the effects of intraoperatively applied 4DF on the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal surgery. In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study, 157 patients after rectal surgery and primary anastomosis were divided into two groups. One group received 4DF (n=57), the other was treated without 4DF application (n=100). The groups were followed up for confirmed ALs. The rate of ALs (P=0.850) proved to be comparable. Other additional outcome parameters like postoperative hospital stay (P=0.801), wound infection rate (P=0.627), re-admission rate (P=1.000), re-operation rate (P=0.533) and the 30-day mortality (P=0.463) also showed no statistically significant differences. A multivariable regression model for the complete cohort could not identify 4DF application as prognostically relevant for the development of AL, whereas rectal cancer (OR=2.660 [1.184–5.974]; P=0.018), smoking (OR=3.555 [1.326–9.533]; P=0.012), an ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score ≥3 (OR=2.894 [1.300–6.442]; P=0.009) and male sex (OR=2.411 [1.040–5.591]; P=0.040) were determined as independent risk factors. The application of 4DF in proximity to the anastomotic region after rectal surgery did not increase the risk of AL and showed no impact on other investigated outcome parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1