护士如何看待知识与实践之间的差距

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Enfermeria Clinica Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfcli.2024.01.001
Roai S. Gassas , Mohamed E. Ahmed
{"title":"护士如何看待知识与实践之间的差距","authors":"Roai S. Gassas ,&nbsp;Mohamed E. Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Identifying nurses’ perceptions of the knowledge-practice gap is a critical step toward developing evidence-based practice. Currently, multiple factors contribute to the gap between nursing education and actual practice. Addressing this gap requires a new perspective, not yet adequately represented in the literature, that includes nurses’ perceptions.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aims to describe nurses’ perceptions of the knowledge-practice gap in the domains of knowledge, practice, environment, and learning. And it analyzes how nurses’ professional characteristics are associated with their perceptions of the gap in each of these domains as well as the relationships between the domains themselves.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study used a cross-sectional descriptive correlational design. A sample of 513 staff nurses recruited through a convenience sampling technique provided information on professional variables such as education and experience and completed a Likert-scale survey about their perceptions of the knowledge–practice gap.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Their answers were found to vary with educational level and history of workshop attendance. Items from the knowledge domain were positively and significantly correlated with items from the environment and learning domains, which were also positively and significantly correlated with each other. However, the knowledge and practice domains were not significantly correlated. In addition to showing correlations among the major domains (or aspects) of the knowledge-practice gap, the study highlights how nurses’ professional characteristics contribute to differences in their perceptions of this gap.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings can guide hospital-specific measures for bridging the gap. In addition, the scale can be employed by leaders as a tool for the purpose of conducting assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cómo perciben las enfermeras la brecha entre el conocimiento y la práctica\",\"authors\":\"Roai S. Gassas ,&nbsp;Mohamed E. Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfcli.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Identifying nurses’ perceptions of the knowledge-practice gap is a critical step toward developing evidence-based practice. Currently, multiple factors contribute to the gap between nursing education and actual practice. Addressing this gap requires a new perspective, not yet adequately represented in the literature, that includes nurses’ perceptions.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aims to describe nurses’ perceptions of the knowledge-practice gap in the domains of knowledge, practice, environment, and learning. And it analyzes how nurses’ professional characteristics are associated with their perceptions of the gap in each of these domains as well as the relationships between the domains themselves.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study used a cross-sectional descriptive correlational design. A sample of 513 staff nurses recruited through a convenience sampling technique provided information on professional variables such as education and experience and completed a Likert-scale survey about their perceptions of the knowledge–practice gap.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Their answers were found to vary with educational level and history of workshop attendance. Items from the knowledge domain were positively and significantly correlated with items from the environment and learning domains, which were also positively and significantly correlated with each other. However, the knowledge and practice domains were not significantly correlated. In addition to showing correlations among the major domains (or aspects) of the knowledge-practice gap, the study highlights how nurses’ professional characteristics contribute to differences in their perceptions of this gap.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings can guide hospital-specific measures for bridging the gap. In addition, the scale can be employed by leaders as a tool for the purpose of conducting assessments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Clinica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862124000044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862124000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景确定护士对知识与实践差距的看法是发展循证实践的关键一步。目前,多种因素导致了护理教育与实际操作之间的差距。本研究旨在从知识、实践、环境和学习等方面描述护士对知识与实践差距的看法。本研究旨在描述护士在知识、实践、环境和学习方面对知识与实践差距的看法,并分析护士的职业特征与他们对上述各领域差距的看法之间的关联,以及各领域之间的关系。研究采用了横断面描述性相关设计,通过便利抽样技术招募了 513 名护士,他们提供了有关教育和经验等专业变量的信息,并完成了有关他们对知识与实践差距的看法的李克特量表调查。知识领域的项目与环境和学习领域的项目呈显著正相关,而环境和学习领域的项目之间也呈显著正相关。但是,知识领域和实践领域之间没有明显的相关性。除了显示知识与实践差距的主要领域(或方面)之间的相关性外,本研究还强调了护士的专业特点如何导致她们对这一差距的认知差异。此外,该量表还可作为领导者进行评估的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cómo perciben las enfermeras la brecha entre el conocimiento y la práctica

Background

Identifying nurses’ perceptions of the knowledge-practice gap is a critical step toward developing evidence-based practice. Currently, multiple factors contribute to the gap between nursing education and actual practice. Addressing this gap requires a new perspective, not yet adequately represented in the literature, that includes nurses’ perceptions.

Aim

This study aims to describe nurses’ perceptions of the knowledge-practice gap in the domains of knowledge, practice, environment, and learning. And it analyzes how nurses’ professional characteristics are associated with their perceptions of the gap in each of these domains as well as the relationships between the domains themselves.

Methods

The study used a cross-sectional descriptive correlational design. A sample of 513 staff nurses recruited through a convenience sampling technique provided information on professional variables such as education and experience and completed a Likert-scale survey about their perceptions of the knowledge–practice gap.

Results

Their answers were found to vary with educational level and history of workshop attendance. Items from the knowledge domain were positively and significantly correlated with items from the environment and learning domains, which were also positively and significantly correlated with each other. However, the knowledge and practice domains were not significantly correlated. In addition to showing correlations among the major domains (or aspects) of the knowledge-practice gap, the study highlights how nurses’ professional characteristics contribute to differences in their perceptions of this gap.

Conclusion

These findings can guide hospital-specific measures for bridging the gap. In addition, the scale can be employed by leaders as a tool for the purpose of conducting assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
期刊最新文献
Uso de la medicina complementaria y alternativa y enfoques para hacer frente al estrés en las mujeres con cáncer de mama: un estudio transversal El papel moderador de la experiencia laboral en el efecto de la cultura ética en la denuncia de irregularidades en los profesionales de la salud y el efecto de la confianza organizacional en la denuncia de irregularidades Impacto de los niveles de interacción enfermera-paciente en la práctica humanística de enfermería: estudio transversal, descriptivo y correlacional Satisfacción de los pacientes sobre la atención recibida por la enfermera en el triaje de los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios: revisión de alcance Transferencia de resultados en la práctica clínica y participación ciudadana en la investigación en cuidados: una integración necesaria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1