乌干达艾滋病毒感染者对每日(1HP)与每周(3HP)服用异烟肼-利福喷丁的偏好

A. Musinguzi, H. E. Aschmann, J. Kadota, J. Nakimuli, F. Welishe, J. Kakeeto, C. Namale, L. Akello, A. Nakitende, C. Berger, A. Katamba, J. Tumuhamye, N. Kiwanuka, D. Dowdy, A. Cattamanchi, F. Semitala
{"title":"乌干达艾滋病毒感染者对每日(1HP)与每周(3HP)服用异烟肼-利福喷丁的偏好","authors":"A. Musinguzi, H. E. Aschmann, J. Kadota, J. Nakimuli, F. Welishe, J. Kakeeto, C. Namale, L. Akello, A. Nakitende, C. Berger, A. Katamba, J. Tumuhamye, N. Kiwanuka, D. Dowdy, A. Cattamanchi, F. Semitala","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDBoth 1 month of daily (1HP) and 3 months of weekly (3HP) isoniazid-rifapentine are recommended as short-course regimens for TB prevention among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We aimed to assess acceptability and preferences for 1HP\n vs. 3HP among PLHIV.METHODSIn a cross-sectional survey among PLHIV at an HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda, participants were randomly assigned to a hypothetical scenario of receiving 1HP or 3HP. Participants rated their level of perceived\n intention and confidence to complete treatment using a 0–10 Likert scale, and chose between 1HP and 3HP.RESULTSAmong 429 respondents (median age: 43 years, 71% female, median time on ART: 10 years), intention and confidence were rated\n high for both regimens. Intention to complete treatment was rated at least 7/10 by 92% (189/206 randomized to 1HP) and 93% (207/223 randomized to 3HP). Respectively 86% (178/206) and 93% (208/223) expressed high confidence to complete treatment. Overall, 81% (348/429) preferred 3HP over 1HP.CONCLUSIONSBoth\n 1HP and 3HP were highly acceptable regimens, with 3HP preferred by most PLHIV. Weekly, rather than daily, dosing appears preferable to shorter duration of treatment, which should inform scale-up and further development of short-course regimens for TB prevention.","PeriodicalId":516613,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD OPEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preference for daily (1HP) vs. weekly (3HP) isoniazid-rifapentine among people living with HIV in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"A. Musinguzi, H. E. Aschmann, J. Kadota, J. Nakimuli, F. Welishe, J. Kakeeto, C. Namale, L. Akello, A. Nakitende, C. Berger, A. Katamba, J. Tumuhamye, N. Kiwanuka, D. Dowdy, A. Cattamanchi, F. Semitala\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUNDBoth 1 month of daily (1HP) and 3 months of weekly (3HP) isoniazid-rifapentine are recommended as short-course regimens for TB prevention among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We aimed to assess acceptability and preferences for 1HP\\n vs. 3HP among PLHIV.METHODSIn a cross-sectional survey among PLHIV at an HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda, participants were randomly assigned to a hypothetical scenario of receiving 1HP or 3HP. Participants rated their level of perceived\\n intention and confidence to complete treatment using a 0–10 Likert scale, and chose between 1HP and 3HP.RESULTSAmong 429 respondents (median age: 43 years, 71% female, median time on ART: 10 years), intention and confidence were rated\\n high for both regimens. Intention to complete treatment was rated at least 7/10 by 92% (189/206 randomized to 1HP) and 93% (207/223 randomized to 3HP). Respectively 86% (178/206) and 93% (208/223) expressed high confidence to complete treatment. Overall, 81% (348/429) preferred 3HP over 1HP.CONCLUSIONSBoth\\n 1HP and 3HP were highly acceptable regimens, with 3HP preferred by most PLHIV. Weekly, rather than daily, dosing appears preferable to shorter duration of treatment, which should inform scale-up and further development of short-course regimens for TB prevention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD OPEN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD OPEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD OPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景建议将每天服用 1 个月(1HP)异烟肼-利福喷丁和每周服用 3 个月(3HP)异烟肼-利福喷丁作为艾滋病病毒感染者(PLHIV)预防结核病的短程治疗方案。我们旨在评估 PLHIV 对 1HP 与 3HP 的接受度和偏好。方法在乌干达坎帕拉一家 HIV 诊所对 PLHIV 进行横断面调查,参与者被随机分配到接受 1HP 或 3HP 的假设情景中。结果在 429 名受访者(中位数年龄:43 岁,71% 为女性,中位数接受抗逆转录病毒疗法时间:10 年)中,两种治疗方案的意向和信心都很高。92%的受访者(189/206 人随机选择 1HP 方案)和 93%的受访者(207/223 人随机选择 3HP 方案)对完成治疗的意向评分至少为 7/10。分别有 86%(178/206)和 93%(208/223)的人对完成治疗表示很有信心。总体而言,81%的患者(348/429)更倾向于 3HP 而非 1HP。每周给药而不是每天给药似乎更有利于缩短疗程,这应为结核病预防短疗程方案的推广和进一步开发提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preference for daily (1HP) vs. weekly (3HP) isoniazid-rifapentine among people living with HIV in Uganda
BACKGROUNDBoth 1 month of daily (1HP) and 3 months of weekly (3HP) isoniazid-rifapentine are recommended as short-course regimens for TB prevention among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We aimed to assess acceptability and preferences for 1HP vs. 3HP among PLHIV.METHODSIn a cross-sectional survey among PLHIV at an HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda, participants were randomly assigned to a hypothetical scenario of receiving 1HP or 3HP. Participants rated their level of perceived intention and confidence to complete treatment using a 0–10 Likert scale, and chose between 1HP and 3HP.RESULTSAmong 429 respondents (median age: 43 years, 71% female, median time on ART: 10 years), intention and confidence were rated high for both regimens. Intention to complete treatment was rated at least 7/10 by 92% (189/206 randomized to 1HP) and 93% (207/223 randomized to 3HP). Respectively 86% (178/206) and 93% (208/223) expressed high confidence to complete treatment. Overall, 81% (348/429) preferred 3HP over 1HP.CONCLUSIONSBoth 1HP and 3HP were highly acceptable regimens, with 3HP preferred by most PLHIV. Weekly, rather than daily, dosing appears preferable to shorter duration of treatment, which should inform scale-up and further development of short-course regimens for TB prevention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines Evaluation of a national multidisciplinary meeting for non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease Leveraging Global Fund’s investments to expand innovative public-private provider engagement in TB Real-life use of delamanid: results from the European post-authorisation safety study Embracing novel thinking to safeguard against airborne pathogens in indoor spaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1