文章:股权众筹和迷你债券:中小企业经济复苏的工具:英国和意大利司法管辖区的比例、危险和前景

Q2 Social Sciences European Business Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.54648/eulr2024011
Mario Alcaro Falchi Delitala
{"title":"文章:股权众筹和迷你债券:中小企业经济复苏的工具:英国和意大利司法管辖区的比例、危险和前景","authors":"Mario Alcaro Falchi Delitala","doi":"10.54648/eulr2024011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper, after briefly outlining what mini-bonds and equity crowdfunding platforms consist, will deal with the regulations in the UK and in Italy to regulate the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms in a second chapter, outlining the similarities and divergences of methods and purposes with which they were conceived in the two countries. In a third chapter the advantages and disadvantages with regard not only to the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms for SMEs that issue mini-bonds, but also for consumers will be analysed. Finally, in the last chapter the author will try to clarify and justify the ban by the FCA to retail investors for purchase of “speculative illiquid securities” also due to the numerous scandals that occurred in the UK, but at the same time, proposals will be put forward aimed at better regulating the phenomenon and encouraging the use of this alternative financial instrument.\nMini-bonds, crowdfunding, alternative finance, fintech, financial technologies, comparative law, SMEs, economic policies, Italian jurisdiction, UK jurisdiction.","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":"41 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Article: Equity Crowdfunding and Mini-Bonds: A Tool for the Economic Recovery of SMEs: Ratio, Dangers and Prospective in the UK and Italian Jurisdictions\",\"authors\":\"Mario Alcaro Falchi Delitala\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eulr2024011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following paper, after briefly outlining what mini-bonds and equity crowdfunding platforms consist, will deal with the regulations in the UK and in Italy to regulate the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms in a second chapter, outlining the similarities and divergences of methods and purposes with which they were conceived in the two countries. In a third chapter the advantages and disadvantages with regard not only to the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms for SMEs that issue mini-bonds, but also for consumers will be analysed. Finally, in the last chapter the author will try to clarify and justify the ban by the FCA to retail investors for purchase of “speculative illiquid securities” also due to the numerous scandals that occurred in the UK, but at the same time, proposals will be put forward aimed at better regulating the phenomenon and encouraging the use of this alternative financial instrument.\\nMini-bonds, crowdfunding, alternative finance, fintech, financial technologies, comparative law, SMEs, economic policies, Italian jurisdiction, UK jurisdiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"volume\":\"41 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2024011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2024011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在简要概述迷你债券和股权众筹平台的内涵之后,将在第二章中讨论英国和意大利对通过众筹平台发行迷你债券的监管规定,概述两国在设计迷你债券的方法和目的方面的异同。第三章将分析通过众筹平台发行迷你债券对发行迷你债券的中小企业以及消费者的利弊。最后,在最后一章中,作者将试图澄清并证明金融监管局禁止散户投资者购买 "投机性非流动证券 "的理由,这也是由于在英国发生了许多丑闻,但与此同时,将提出旨在更好地监管这一现象并鼓励使用这种替代性金融工具的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Article: Equity Crowdfunding and Mini-Bonds: A Tool for the Economic Recovery of SMEs: Ratio, Dangers and Prospective in the UK and Italian Jurisdictions
The following paper, after briefly outlining what mini-bonds and equity crowdfunding platforms consist, will deal with the regulations in the UK and in Italy to regulate the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms in a second chapter, outlining the similarities and divergences of methods and purposes with which they were conceived in the two countries. In a third chapter the advantages and disadvantages with regard not only to the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms for SMEs that issue mini-bonds, but also for consumers will be analysed. Finally, in the last chapter the author will try to clarify and justify the ban by the FCA to retail investors for purchase of “speculative illiquid securities” also due to the numerous scandals that occurred in the UK, but at the same time, proposals will be put forward aimed at better regulating the phenomenon and encouraging the use of this alternative financial instrument. Mini-bonds, crowdfunding, alternative finance, fintech, financial technologies, comparative law, SMEs, economic policies, Italian jurisdiction, UK jurisdiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Business Law Review
European Business Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.
期刊最新文献
Article: Legislation Comment: Considerations on the Digital Markets Act, the Way to a Fair and Open Digital Environment Article: Open-Price Contracts Under the CISG: The Law in Action Article: EU Law and the Member States’ Competence to Regulate the Operation of Collaborative Economy Platforms – Where Do We Stand after the Digital Services Act Article: The Systemic Importance of Asset Managers: A Case Study for the Future of SIFI Regulation Article: Codes of Conduct in German Employment Relationships – A Measure to Adequately Implementing Compliance and Data Protection?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1