When rule breaking in art falls flat: Cultural tightness deflates deviant artists’ impact.

Previous research in western countries shows that artists whose work deviates from their own previous style (intrapersonal deviance) and other artists ’ styles (interpersonal deviance) gain greater impact than nondevi-ant artists (Stamkou et al., 2018). However, aesthetic norms are embedded in cultural contextsthat shape the meaning of artist deviance. Deviance is compatible with the ideal of innovation endorsed by loose cultures, yetincongruentwiththeidealofconformityprominentintightcultures.Hereweexaminehowculturaltight-ness – looseness in fl uencesthe effect of interpersonal (Studies 1 – 2) and intrapersonal deviance (Studies 3 – 4) on various indices of impact, including perceived artist in fl uence, artwork valuation, purchase intention, and recommendation of the artist ’ s work to a museum. Study 1 shows that Italian participants (looser culture) perceived artists who deviated from the motif used by their contemporary artists as more impactful than Chinese participants (tighter culture). Study 2 shows that the looser U.S. communities ’ response to COVID-19 rules, the more impactful they considered deviant artists. Study 3 shows that U.S. participants low in tightness mindset were more likely to recommend artists who deviated from their previous style to a company than artists who consistently followed a single style. Accordingly, Study 4 shows that U.S. participants high in tightness mindset were more likely to recommend nondeviant over deviant artworks to a museum. Cultural tightness attenuates the effect of deviance on impact by reducing the experience of profound aesthetic emotions (e.g., awe, beauty, interest) in response to deviant artworks (Studies 2 – 4).