印度尼西亚的非法卷烟贸易:近期判决的趋势和分析

Q3 Social Sciences Sriwijaya Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.2726.pp38-59
I. Gede, Widhiana Suarda, Bayu Evan Harman, Dwi Anggono, Fendi Setyawan, Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman, Zaki Priambudi 38-59, Evan Hamman, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman, David Décary-Hétu, Vincent Mousseau, Ikrame Rguioui
{"title":"印度尼西亚的非法卷烟贸易:近期判决的趋势和分析","authors":"I. Gede, Widhiana Suarda, Bayu Evan Harman, Dwi Anggono, Fendi Setyawan, Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman, Zaki Priambudi 38-59, Evan Hamman, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman, David Décary-Hétu, Vincent Mousseau, Ikrame Rguioui","doi":"10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.2726.pp38-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The illicit cigarette trade has begun to receive scholarly attention globally. Empirical studies on the illicit cigarette trade are available in the context of Indonesia. However, the Indonesian judicial system lacks a focus on treating illegal practices. To fill the gap, we examine Indonesian court decisions involving the illicit cigarette trade between 2010 and 2019. We provide an overview of the enforcement of Indonesia’s Excise Law 2007 relating to offences related to the illicit cigarette trade. By using a systematic quantitative literature review, we collected data on Indonesian court decisions and found the following: (1) convictions for the practice of illicit trade in cigarettes were relatively steady, with a total number from one to six court decisions annually; (2) certain offences from Indonesia Excise Law 2007 have not been found in the convictions, suggesting their underutilisation in terms of monitoring and enforcement effort; (3) the primary motivation of illicit cigarette traders as reported through the judicial system is the economic benefit or “profit” available to the enterprise; and (4) the sentencing decisions are dominated by the application of the “cumulative principle” with fines and imprisonment applied at the same time. The finding on the average length of imprisonment for illicit cigarettes, which was around 18 months, shows that this crime has low risk compared with the punishment for illicit trade in drugs and narcotics in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":32073,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Law Review","volume":"531 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illicit Cigarette Trade in Indonesia: Trends and Analysis from the Recent Judgments\",\"authors\":\"I. Gede, Widhiana Suarda, Bayu Evan Harman, Dwi Anggono, Fendi Setyawan, Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman, Zaki Priambudi 38-59, Evan Hamman, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman, David Décary-Hétu, Vincent Mousseau, Ikrame Rguioui\",\"doi\":\"10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.2726.pp38-59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The illicit cigarette trade has begun to receive scholarly attention globally. Empirical studies on the illicit cigarette trade are available in the context of Indonesia. However, the Indonesian judicial system lacks a focus on treating illegal practices. To fill the gap, we examine Indonesian court decisions involving the illicit cigarette trade between 2010 and 2019. We provide an overview of the enforcement of Indonesia’s Excise Law 2007 relating to offences related to the illicit cigarette trade. By using a systematic quantitative literature review, we collected data on Indonesian court decisions and found the following: (1) convictions for the practice of illicit trade in cigarettes were relatively steady, with a total number from one to six court decisions annually; (2) certain offences from Indonesia Excise Law 2007 have not been found in the convictions, suggesting their underutilisation in terms of monitoring and enforcement effort; (3) the primary motivation of illicit cigarette traders as reported through the judicial system is the economic benefit or “profit” available to the enterprise; and (4) the sentencing decisions are dominated by the application of the “cumulative principle” with fines and imprisonment applied at the same time. The finding on the average length of imprisonment for illicit cigarettes, which was around 18 months, shows that this crime has low risk compared with the punishment for illicit trade in drugs and narcotics in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sriwijaya Law Review\",\"volume\":\"531 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sriwijaya Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.2726.pp38-59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.2726.pp38-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非法香烟贸易已开始受到全球学术界的关注。印尼对非法香烟贸易进行了实证研究。然而,印尼的司法系统缺乏对非法行为的关注。为了填补这一空白,我们研究了 2010 年至 2019 年期间印尼法院做出的涉及非法香烟贸易的判决。我们概述了印度尼西亚《2007 年消费税法》中与非法香烟贸易相关罪行的执行情况。通过系统的定量文献回顾,我们收集了有关印尼法院判决的数据,并发现了以下情况:(1) 对卷烟非法贸易行为的定罪相对稳定,每年的法院判决总数在 1 到 6 个之间;(2) 2007 年《印尼消费税法》中的某些罪行未在定罪中出现,这表明其在监督和执法工作中未得到充分利用;(3) 根据司法系统的报告,非法香烟贸易商的主要动机是企业的经济利益或 "利润";以及 (4) 判决主要适用 "累积原则",即同时适用罚款和监禁。非法香烟的平均监禁时间约为 18 个月,这一结果表明,与印度尼西亚对毒品和麻醉品非法贸易的处罚相比,这种犯罪的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illicit Cigarette Trade in Indonesia: Trends and Analysis from the Recent Judgments
The illicit cigarette trade has begun to receive scholarly attention globally. Empirical studies on the illicit cigarette trade are available in the context of Indonesia. However, the Indonesian judicial system lacks a focus on treating illegal practices. To fill the gap, we examine Indonesian court decisions involving the illicit cigarette trade between 2010 and 2019. We provide an overview of the enforcement of Indonesia’s Excise Law 2007 relating to offences related to the illicit cigarette trade. By using a systematic quantitative literature review, we collected data on Indonesian court decisions and found the following: (1) convictions for the practice of illicit trade in cigarettes were relatively steady, with a total number from one to six court decisions annually; (2) certain offences from Indonesia Excise Law 2007 have not been found in the convictions, suggesting their underutilisation in terms of monitoring and enforcement effort; (3) the primary motivation of illicit cigarette traders as reported through the judicial system is the economic benefit or “profit” available to the enterprise; and (4) the sentencing decisions are dominated by the application of the “cumulative principle” with fines and imprisonment applied at the same time. The finding on the average length of imprisonment for illicit cigarettes, which was around 18 months, shows that this crime has low risk compared with the punishment for illicit trade in drugs and narcotics in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sriwijaya Law Review
Sriwijaya Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can the Right to A Good and Healthy Environment be Claimed as a Human Right? Judaization in Palestine: Is It Genocide According to the 1998 Rome Statute? Criminal Legal Protection for Bona Fide Third Parties Over Assets in Corruption and Money Laundering Cases Mapping and Harmonizing Qanun on Sharia Financial Institutions Problematics of Inter-Regional Cooperation in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1