卢旺达大学科学技术学院的生物技术教学:生物技术概念理解的教学实践和学习方式评估

Yvonne Ndikumana, L. Mugabo, Antoine Nsabimana
{"title":"卢旺达大学科学技术学院的生物技术教学:生物技术概念理解的教学实践和学习方式评估","authors":"Yvonne Ndikumana, L. Mugabo, Antoine Nsabimana","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.23.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study addresses the crucial need for assessing teaching practices and learning styles to improve students' understanding of biotechnological concepts and enhance overall learning outcomes. A mixed-method research design was adopted to collect and analyse data. The quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data were analysed by thematic analysis. The sample consisted of two (2) teachers and 109 students. The techniques for sampling were convenience sampling for the survey and purposive sampling for the interview. Both teachers and students were involved in teaching and learning biotechnology courses related to the crop improvement. Questionnaires, interview, and classroom observation were used to collect data, which were quantitatively and qualitatively analysed. The study found that teaching methods such as semi-formal lectures, PowerPoint presentations, interactive lectures, blended methods, student presentations, and audio-visual techniques were commonly used. Formal authority, expert, and personal teaching styles were prevalent, with the facilitator style being the least utilized. Students primarily learn through auditory and reading styles, occasionally incorporating visual elements. Despite the emphasis on collaborative learning, student-based activities were not given significant consideration. The spectrum of these practices comprised a mix of student- and teacher-centred approaches with the dominance of the teacher-centred method. Thus, for effective teaching and learning, the present study suggests future research on the implementation of new innovative teaching strategies to help all students to develop autonomy and to learn according to their diversities regarding their learning styles.","PeriodicalId":37101,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","volume":"45 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching and Learning Biotechnology at University of Rwanda - College of Science and Technology: The Assessment of Teaching Practices and Learning Styles for Biotechnology Concepts Understanding\",\"authors\":\"Yvonne Ndikumana, L. Mugabo, Antoine Nsabimana\",\"doi\":\"10.26803/ijlter.23.1.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study addresses the crucial need for assessing teaching practices and learning styles to improve students' understanding of biotechnological concepts and enhance overall learning outcomes. A mixed-method research design was adopted to collect and analyse data. The quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data were analysed by thematic analysis. The sample consisted of two (2) teachers and 109 students. The techniques for sampling were convenience sampling for the survey and purposive sampling for the interview. Both teachers and students were involved in teaching and learning biotechnology courses related to the crop improvement. Questionnaires, interview, and classroom observation were used to collect data, which were quantitatively and qualitatively analysed. The study found that teaching methods such as semi-formal lectures, PowerPoint presentations, interactive lectures, blended methods, student presentations, and audio-visual techniques were commonly used. Formal authority, expert, and personal teaching styles were prevalent, with the facilitator style being the least utilized. Students primarily learn through auditory and reading styles, occasionally incorporating visual elements. Despite the emphasis on collaborative learning, student-based activities were not given significant consideration. The spectrum of these practices comprised a mix of student- and teacher-centred approaches with the dominance of the teacher-centred method. Thus, for effective teaching and learning, the present study suggests future research on the implementation of new innovative teaching strategies to help all students to develop autonomy and to learn according to their diversities regarding their learning styles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"45 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究针对评估教学实践和学习方式的关键需求,以改善学生对生物技术概念的理解,提高整体学习效果。本研究采用混合方法研究设计来收集和分析数据。对定量数据进行描述性分析,对定性数据进行专题分析。样本包括两(2)名教师和 109 名学生。调查采用方便抽样法,访谈采用目的抽样法。教师和学生都参与了与作物改良相关的生物技术课程的教学。研究采用问卷调查、访谈和课堂观察等方法收集数据,并对数据进行定量和定性分析。研究发现,半正式讲座、PowerPoint 演示、互动式讲座、混合式教学法、学生演讲和视听技术等教学方法被普遍采用。正式的权威式、专家式和个人式教学风格盛行,而主持式教学风格使用最少。学生主要通过听觉和阅读方式学习,偶尔也会融入视觉元素。尽管强调合作学习,但以学生为基础的活动并没有得到重视。这些做法包括以学生为中心和以教师为中心的混合方法,以教师为中心的方法占主导地位。因此,为了实现有效的教与学,本研究建议今后研究实施新的创新教学策略,以帮助所有学生发展自主性,并根据其学习风格的多样性进行学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching and Learning Biotechnology at University of Rwanda - College of Science and Technology: The Assessment of Teaching Practices and Learning Styles for Biotechnology Concepts Understanding
This study addresses the crucial need for assessing teaching practices and learning styles to improve students' understanding of biotechnological concepts and enhance overall learning outcomes. A mixed-method research design was adopted to collect and analyse data. The quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data were analysed by thematic analysis. The sample consisted of two (2) teachers and 109 students. The techniques for sampling were convenience sampling for the survey and purposive sampling for the interview. Both teachers and students were involved in teaching and learning biotechnology courses related to the crop improvement. Questionnaires, interview, and classroom observation were used to collect data, which were quantitatively and qualitatively analysed. The study found that teaching methods such as semi-formal lectures, PowerPoint presentations, interactive lectures, blended methods, student presentations, and audio-visual techniques were commonly used. Formal authority, expert, and personal teaching styles were prevalent, with the facilitator style being the least utilized. Students primarily learn through auditory and reading styles, occasionally incorporating visual elements. Despite the emphasis on collaborative learning, student-based activities were not given significant consideration. The spectrum of these practices comprised a mix of student- and teacher-centred approaches with the dominance of the teacher-centred method. Thus, for effective teaching and learning, the present study suggests future research on the implementation of new innovative teaching strategies to help all students to develop autonomy and to learn according to their diversities regarding their learning styles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Linguistic Landscapes for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Cuenca, Ecuador Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Learner Autonomy: A Case Study in Vietnam Reflection Analysis of Resilient and Sustainable Research and Publication Activities at the National University of Science & Technology, Oman during COVID-19 The Effectiveness of Team Teaching in Improving Reading Skill among Thai EFL Undergraduates and Their Attitudes toward this Strategy Testing the Healthy School Organisation Instrument (i-OS) and the Holistic Psychological Well-Being Model of School Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1