乌克兰高等教育中的人工智能(AI):利益相关者的态度、期望和担忧综合研究

V. Bobrytska, H. Krasylnykova, Nataliia А. Beseda, Sergii R. Krasylnykov, Tetiana S. Skyrda
{"title":"乌克兰高等教育中的人工智能(AI):利益相关者的态度、期望和担忧综合研究","authors":"V. Bobrytska, H. Krasylnykova, Nataliia А. Beseda, Sergii R. Krasylnykov, Tetiana S. Skyrda","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.23.1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines stakeholders’ attitudes toward Artificial intelligence (AI) tools in Ukrainian higher education institutions, employing a comprehensive mixed-methods approach. The research combines qualitative focus group discussions, which involved a diverse range of participants, and a quantitative survey questionnaire distributed to a sizeable cohort. The quantitative data reveals a noteworthy trend, with a majority of stakeholders expressing positive attitudes toward AI integration, emphasising its potential for personalised learning and real-time feedback. This positive sentiment, however, is tempered by identified concerns, notably surrounding the accuracy of AI-generated content. The study establishes a connection with existing literature, affirming the widespread acceptance and benefits of AI in education. For a more nuanced understanding, a detailed breakdown of these quantitative results sheds light on the extent and distribution of stakeholder attitudes and concerns. Moreover, the qualitative component delves deeper into stakeholders’ perspectives, capturing the richness of their expressions. Concrete examples and direct quotes from participants in focus group discussions provide a qualitative dimension to the study’s findings, offering insights into the nuances of stakeholders’ viewpoints. To address these concerns, the research emphasises the need for tailored intervention plans, focusing on content quality, ethical implications and comprehensive training. These recommendations are rooted in a thorough analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data, providing practical insights for policymakers and institutions. In particular, the study highlights the importance of inclusive decision-making and targeted communication strategies, recognising role-based and age-related variations among stakeholders. By adopting a holistic approach to AI integration and acknowledging the interrelationships between attitudes, perceptions, expectations and concerns, this research provides a comprehensive guide for effectively leveraging AI while addressing associated concerns in higher education institutions.","PeriodicalId":37101,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","volume":"191 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence (AI) in Ukrainian Higher Education: A Comprehensive Study of Stakeholder Attitudes, Expectations and Concerns\",\"authors\":\"V. Bobrytska, H. Krasylnykova, Nataliia А. Beseda, Sergii R. Krasylnykov, Tetiana S. Skyrda\",\"doi\":\"10.26803/ijlter.23.1.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines stakeholders’ attitudes toward Artificial intelligence (AI) tools in Ukrainian higher education institutions, employing a comprehensive mixed-methods approach. The research combines qualitative focus group discussions, which involved a diverse range of participants, and a quantitative survey questionnaire distributed to a sizeable cohort. The quantitative data reveals a noteworthy trend, with a majority of stakeholders expressing positive attitudes toward AI integration, emphasising its potential for personalised learning and real-time feedback. This positive sentiment, however, is tempered by identified concerns, notably surrounding the accuracy of AI-generated content. The study establishes a connection with existing literature, affirming the widespread acceptance and benefits of AI in education. For a more nuanced understanding, a detailed breakdown of these quantitative results sheds light on the extent and distribution of stakeholder attitudes and concerns. Moreover, the qualitative component delves deeper into stakeholders’ perspectives, capturing the richness of their expressions. Concrete examples and direct quotes from participants in focus group discussions provide a qualitative dimension to the study’s findings, offering insights into the nuances of stakeholders’ viewpoints. To address these concerns, the research emphasises the need for tailored intervention plans, focusing on content quality, ethical implications and comprehensive training. These recommendations are rooted in a thorough analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data, providing practical insights for policymakers and institutions. In particular, the study highlights the importance of inclusive decision-making and targeted communication strategies, recognising role-based and age-related variations among stakeholders. By adopting a holistic approach to AI integration and acknowledging the interrelationships between attitudes, perceptions, expectations and concerns, this research provides a comprehensive guide for effectively leveraging AI while addressing associated concerns in higher education institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用综合混合方法,考察了乌克兰高等教育机构中利益相关者对人工智能(AI)工具的态度。研究结合了定性焦点小组讨论和定量调查问卷,定性焦点小组讨论的参与者范围广泛,而定量调查问卷的发放对象则具有一定规模。定量数据揭示了一个值得注意的趋势,即大多数利益相关者对人工智能整合表达了积极的态度,强调了其在个性化学习和实时反馈方面的潜力。不过,这种积极的态度也受到了已发现问题的影响,尤其是围绕人工智能生成内容的准确性。本研究与现有文献建立了联系,肯定了人工智能在教育领域的广泛接受度和优势。为了获得更细致的理解,对这些定量结果的详细分析揭示了利益相关者的态度和担忧的程度和分布。此外,定性部分深入探讨了利益相关者的观点,捕捉到了他们丰富的表达方式。焦点小组讨论参与者的具体事例和直接引语为研究结果提供了一个定性维度,使我们能够深入了解利益相关者观点的细微差别。为解决这些问题,研究强调有必要制定有针对性的干预计划,重点关注内容质量、伦理影响和全面培训。这些建议植根于对定量和定性数据的全面分析,为政策制定者和机构提供了切实可行的见解。研究特别强调了包容性决策和有针对性的传播战略的重要性,同时认识到利益相关者之间基于角色和年龄的差异。本研究采用整体方法来整合人工智能,并承认态度、观念、期望和担忧之间的相互关系,从而为高等教育机构有效利用人工智能并解决相关问题提供了全面指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence (AI) in Ukrainian Higher Education: A Comprehensive Study of Stakeholder Attitudes, Expectations and Concerns
This study examines stakeholders’ attitudes toward Artificial intelligence (AI) tools in Ukrainian higher education institutions, employing a comprehensive mixed-methods approach. The research combines qualitative focus group discussions, which involved a diverse range of participants, and a quantitative survey questionnaire distributed to a sizeable cohort. The quantitative data reveals a noteworthy trend, with a majority of stakeholders expressing positive attitudes toward AI integration, emphasising its potential for personalised learning and real-time feedback. This positive sentiment, however, is tempered by identified concerns, notably surrounding the accuracy of AI-generated content. The study establishes a connection with existing literature, affirming the widespread acceptance and benefits of AI in education. For a more nuanced understanding, a detailed breakdown of these quantitative results sheds light on the extent and distribution of stakeholder attitudes and concerns. Moreover, the qualitative component delves deeper into stakeholders’ perspectives, capturing the richness of their expressions. Concrete examples and direct quotes from participants in focus group discussions provide a qualitative dimension to the study’s findings, offering insights into the nuances of stakeholders’ viewpoints. To address these concerns, the research emphasises the need for tailored intervention plans, focusing on content quality, ethical implications and comprehensive training. These recommendations are rooted in a thorough analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data, providing practical insights for policymakers and institutions. In particular, the study highlights the importance of inclusive decision-making and targeted communication strategies, recognising role-based and age-related variations among stakeholders. By adopting a holistic approach to AI integration and acknowledging the interrelationships between attitudes, perceptions, expectations and concerns, this research provides a comprehensive guide for effectively leveraging AI while addressing associated concerns in higher education institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Linguistic Landscapes for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Cuenca, Ecuador Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Learner Autonomy: A Case Study in Vietnam Reflection Analysis of Resilient and Sustainable Research and Publication Activities at the National University of Science & Technology, Oman during COVID-19 The Effectiveness of Team Teaching in Improving Reading Skill among Thai EFL Undergraduates and Their Attitudes toward this Strategy Testing the Healthy School Organisation Instrument (i-OS) and the Holistic Psychological Well-Being Model of School Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1