自然科学专业高中生的计算思维能力水平

Nur Huda, Eli Rohaeti
{"title":"自然科学专业高中生的计算思维能力水平","authors":"Nur Huda, Eli Rohaeti","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.23.1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational thinking (CT) is a skill integrated into various curricula in many countries. However, lack of student acceptance and limited assessment become challenges to integrating skill into the curriculum, specifically in developing countries like Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Indonesian version of the Computational Thinking Scale (CTS) and determine the CT skill level of high school students majoring in science. This study was conducted using a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey design. Participants were purposively selected based on certain criteria from a population of high schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In this study, data were collected from 526 students with 19 items of CTS questionnaires and analysed using the Rasch model measurement. The findings showed that the adapted CTS met the fit criteria based on Rasch model measurement, except for one item. Based on the logit mean value of +1.69, the level of students' CT ability falls into the good category, where the most frequently implemented aspect is the problem-solving aspect, while the least frequently implemented aspect is algorithmic thinking. According to Differential Item Function analysis, there were differences in student responses based on coding experience. This study is expected to contribute to the field of CT assessment in science education. In addition, the results of this study can be an affirmation for educational policy makers in developing countries to integrate CT into the curriculum of natural science majors.","PeriodicalId":37101,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","volume":"756 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Thinking Skill Level of Senior High School Students Majoring in Natural Science\",\"authors\":\"Nur Huda, Eli Rohaeti\",\"doi\":\"10.26803/ijlter.23.1.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computational thinking (CT) is a skill integrated into various curricula in many countries. However, lack of student acceptance and limited assessment become challenges to integrating skill into the curriculum, specifically in developing countries like Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Indonesian version of the Computational Thinking Scale (CTS) and determine the CT skill level of high school students majoring in science. This study was conducted using a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey design. Participants were purposively selected based on certain criteria from a population of high schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In this study, data were collected from 526 students with 19 items of CTS questionnaires and analysed using the Rasch model measurement. The findings showed that the adapted CTS met the fit criteria based on Rasch model measurement, except for one item. Based on the logit mean value of +1.69, the level of students' CT ability falls into the good category, where the most frequently implemented aspect is the problem-solving aspect, while the least frequently implemented aspect is algorithmic thinking. According to Differential Item Function analysis, there were differences in student responses based on coding experience. This study is expected to contribute to the field of CT assessment in science education. In addition, the results of this study can be an affirmation for educational policy makers in developing countries to integrate CT into the curriculum of natural science majors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"756 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多国家,计算思维(CT)是一种融入各种课程的技能。然而,缺乏学生的接受度和有限的评估成为将这一技能纳入课程的挑战,特别是在像印尼这样的发展中国家。因此,本研究旨在验证印尼版计算思维量表(CTS),并确定科学专业高中生的计算思维技能水平。本研究采用横断面调查设计的定量方法进行。根据特定标准,有目的性地从印度尼西亚日惹的高中人群中选取了参与者。本研究使用 19 个 CTS 问卷项目收集了 526 名学生的数据,并使用 Rasch 模型进行了测量分析。研究结果表明,除一个项目外,改编后的 CTS 符合基于 Rasch 模型测量的拟合标准。根据对数均值+1.69,学生的 CT 能力水平属于良好范畴,其中最常实施的方面是问题解决方面,而最不常实施的方面是算法思维。根据差异项函数分析,学生的回答因编码经验不同而存在差异。本研究有望为科学教育领域的 CT 评估做出贡献。此外,本研究的结果还可以为发展中国家的教育政策制定者将 CT 纳入自然科学专业课程提供肯定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computational Thinking Skill Level of Senior High School Students Majoring in Natural Science
Computational thinking (CT) is a skill integrated into various curricula in many countries. However, lack of student acceptance and limited assessment become challenges to integrating skill into the curriculum, specifically in developing countries like Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Indonesian version of the Computational Thinking Scale (CTS) and determine the CT skill level of high school students majoring in science. This study was conducted using a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey design. Participants were purposively selected based on certain criteria from a population of high schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In this study, data were collected from 526 students with 19 items of CTS questionnaires and analysed using the Rasch model measurement. The findings showed that the adapted CTS met the fit criteria based on Rasch model measurement, except for one item. Based on the logit mean value of +1.69, the level of students' CT ability falls into the good category, where the most frequently implemented aspect is the problem-solving aspect, while the least frequently implemented aspect is algorithmic thinking. According to Differential Item Function analysis, there were differences in student responses based on coding experience. This study is expected to contribute to the field of CT assessment in science education. In addition, the results of this study can be an affirmation for educational policy makers in developing countries to integrate CT into the curriculum of natural science majors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Linguistic Landscapes for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Cuenca, Ecuador Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Learner Autonomy: A Case Study in Vietnam Reflection Analysis of Resilient and Sustainable Research and Publication Activities at the National University of Science & Technology, Oman during COVID-19 The Effectiveness of Team Teaching in Improving Reading Skill among Thai EFL Undergraduates and Their Attitudes toward this Strategy Testing the Healthy School Organisation Instrument (i-OS) and the Holistic Psychological Well-Being Model of School Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1