与爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒相关的鼻咽癌的治疗效果

S. Viranna, Hue-Tsi Wu, Sameera Dalvie
{"title":"与爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒相关的鼻咽癌的治疗效果","authors":"S. Viranna, Hue-Tsi Wu, Sameera Dalvie","doi":"10.4102/sajo.v8i0.279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Data on treatment outcomes of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) largely comes from endemic regions. There is limited literature regarding the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of EBV-associated NPC in South Africa.Aim: The aim of the study was to compare overall survival (OS) of EBV positive and EBV negative NPC patients.Setting: Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.Methods: Data were collected on all patients with histologically confirmed NPC over an 11-year period, including prevalence of EBV, OS, disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional control (LRC), and impact of treatment interruptions on OS.Results: There were 53 patients in total. Non-keratinising carcinoma was the primary histological subtype (86.8%). The majority of patients had EBV positive NPC (47.2%). The 2- and 5-year OS of EBV positive patients treated with curative intent were significantly higher than EBV negative patients, 84.0% versus 34.0% and 45.0% versus 17.0%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.63, p = 0.002). Two-year DFS was 55.0% versus 43.0% (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.18–1.98, p = 0.38) and 2-year LRC were 76.2% versus 46.2% (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.12–1.36, p = 0.13) for EBV positive and EBV negative patients respectively.Conclusion: Treatment of EBV-associated NPC is associated with superior OS compared to EBV negative tumours.Contribution: Epstein-Barr virus was found to be a significant prognostic factor associated with superior OS compared to EBV negative NPC. These findings correlate with literature from endemic and non-endemic regions.","PeriodicalId":52950,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Oncology","volume":"69 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment outcomes of Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"S. Viranna, Hue-Tsi Wu, Sameera Dalvie\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajo.v8i0.279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Data on treatment outcomes of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) largely comes from endemic regions. There is limited literature regarding the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of EBV-associated NPC in South Africa.Aim: The aim of the study was to compare overall survival (OS) of EBV positive and EBV negative NPC patients.Setting: Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.Methods: Data were collected on all patients with histologically confirmed NPC over an 11-year period, including prevalence of EBV, OS, disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional control (LRC), and impact of treatment interruptions on OS.Results: There were 53 patients in total. Non-keratinising carcinoma was the primary histological subtype (86.8%). The majority of patients had EBV positive NPC (47.2%). The 2- and 5-year OS of EBV positive patients treated with curative intent were significantly higher than EBV negative patients, 84.0% versus 34.0% and 45.0% versus 17.0%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.63, p = 0.002). Two-year DFS was 55.0% versus 43.0% (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.18–1.98, p = 0.38) and 2-year LRC were 76.2% versus 46.2% (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.12–1.36, p = 0.13) for EBV positive and EBV negative patients respectively.Conclusion: Treatment of EBV-associated NPC is associated with superior OS compared to EBV negative tumours.Contribution: Epstein-Barr virus was found to be a significant prognostic factor associated with superior OS compared to EBV negative NPC. These findings correlate with literature from endemic and non-endemic regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Oncology\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajo.v8i0.279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajo.v8i0.279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒(EBV)相关的鼻咽癌(NPC)的治疗效果数据主要来自流行地区。有关南非EBV相关鼻咽癌的流行病学和治疗效果的文献十分有限。目的:本研究旨在比较EBV阳性和EBV阴性鼻咽癌患者的总生存率(OS):研究地点:南非格罗特舒尔医院:方法:收集所有经组织学确诊的鼻咽癌患者在11年期间的数据,包括EBV患病率、OS、无病生存期(DFS)、局部区域控制(LRC)以及治疗中断对OS的影响:共有 53 名患者。非角化性癌是主要的组织学亚型(86.8%)。大多数患者为 EBV 阳性鼻咽癌(47.2%)。接受根治性治疗的EBV阳性患者的2年和5年OS明显高于EBV阴性患者,分别为84.0%对34.0%和45.0%对17.0%(危险比[HR]0.25,95%置信区间[CI]:0.10-0.63,P = 0.002)。EBV阳性和EBV阴性患者的两年DFS分别为55.0%对43.0%(HR:0.59,95% CI:0.18-1.98,p = 0.38),两年LRC分别为76.2%对46.2%(HR:0.40,95% CI:0.12-1.36,p = 0.13):结论:与EBV阴性肿瘤相比,EBV相关鼻咽癌的治疗与较好的OS相关:贡献:研究发现,与 EBV 阴性的鼻咽癌相比,EBV 是一个重要的预后因素,与较高的 OS 相关。这些发现与流行地区和非流行地区的文献相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment outcomes of Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Background: Data on treatment outcomes of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) largely comes from endemic regions. There is limited literature regarding the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of EBV-associated NPC in South Africa.Aim: The aim of the study was to compare overall survival (OS) of EBV positive and EBV negative NPC patients.Setting: Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.Methods: Data were collected on all patients with histologically confirmed NPC over an 11-year period, including prevalence of EBV, OS, disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional control (LRC), and impact of treatment interruptions on OS.Results: There were 53 patients in total. Non-keratinising carcinoma was the primary histological subtype (86.8%). The majority of patients had EBV positive NPC (47.2%). The 2- and 5-year OS of EBV positive patients treated with curative intent were significantly higher than EBV negative patients, 84.0% versus 34.0% and 45.0% versus 17.0%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.63, p = 0.002). Two-year DFS was 55.0% versus 43.0% (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.18–1.98, p = 0.38) and 2-year LRC were 76.2% versus 46.2% (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.12–1.36, p = 0.13) for EBV positive and EBV negative patients respectively.Conclusion: Treatment of EBV-associated NPC is associated with superior OS compared to EBV negative tumours.Contribution: Epstein-Barr virus was found to be a significant prognostic factor associated with superior OS compared to EBV negative NPC. These findings correlate with literature from endemic and non-endemic regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Awareness of External Breast Prosthesis, it’s availability and affordability in Eastern Nigeria Quantitative exploration of barriers to access cancer services experienced by cancer patients in Lesotho DNA methylation microarray analysis of adult gliomas: A pilot study at Groote Schuur Hospital Treatment outcomes of Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma Epidemiology of head and neck cancer in a Johannesburg Hospital: A file review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1