山寨模式

Aurora Donzelli
{"title":"山寨模式","authors":"Aurora Donzelli","doi":"10.1075/lcs.00041.don","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article describes how the copycat implementation of foreign protocols of assessment is transforming the\n production of knowledge within the Italian social sciences. Focusing on the gatekeeping process whereby the national agency for\n the evaluation of university research (ANVUR) publishes yearly lists of “Class‑A” journals, my analysis draws on interviews,\n first-hand observations, my own experience as a returning migrant-scholar, as well as comparisons with historical Italian\n journals. My aim is twofold: on the one hand, I reflect on the parallel misrecognition of scale and context underlying neoliberal\n capitalism; on the other hand, I describe the paradoxes of excellence and the forms of reflexive alienation engendered by the\n contemporary knowledge economy.","PeriodicalId":252896,"journal":{"name":"Language, Culture and Society","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The copycat paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Aurora Donzelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lcs.00041.don\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article describes how the copycat implementation of foreign protocols of assessment is transforming the\\n production of knowledge within the Italian social sciences. Focusing on the gatekeeping process whereby the national agency for\\n the evaluation of university research (ANVUR) publishes yearly lists of “Class‑A” journals, my analysis draws on interviews,\\n first-hand observations, my own experience as a returning migrant-scholar, as well as comparisons with historical Italian\\n journals. My aim is twofold: on the one hand, I reflect on the parallel misrecognition of scale and context underlying neoliberal\\n capitalism; on the other hand, I describe the paradoxes of excellence and the forms of reflexive alienation engendered by the\\n contemporary knowledge economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language, Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language, Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00041.don\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00041.don","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了外国评估规程的模仿实施如何改变了意大利社会科学领域的知识生产。我的分析侧重于国家大学研究评估机构(ANVUR)每年公布 "A 级 "期刊名单的把关过程,并借鉴了访谈、第一手观察资料、我作为归国移民学者的亲身经历以及与意大利历史期刊的比较。我的目标是双重的:一方面,我反思新自由主义资本主义对规模和背景的平行误认;另一方面,我描述当代知识经济所产生的卓越悖论和反思性异化形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The copycat paradigm
This article describes how the copycat implementation of foreign protocols of assessment is transforming the production of knowledge within the Italian social sciences. Focusing on the gatekeeping process whereby the national agency for the evaluation of university research (ANVUR) publishes yearly lists of “Class‑A” journals, my analysis draws on interviews, first-hand observations, my own experience as a returning migrant-scholar, as well as comparisons with historical Italian journals. My aim is twofold: on the one hand, I reflect on the parallel misrecognition of scale and context underlying neoliberal capitalism; on the other hand, I describe the paradoxes of excellence and the forms of reflexive alienation engendered by the contemporary knowledge economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Algorithmic power and scientific knowledge Manufacturing Academic Knowledge ‘But we’re among peers!’ Seeking access. Applied ethnopoetic analysis Seeking access. Applied ethnopoetic analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1