{"title":"根据法律或法规。当代意大利犹太教法律经验中的归属与自治","authors":"Stefania Dazzetti","doi":"10.54103/1971-8543/22380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By law or by statute. Belonging and autonomy in the legal experience of contemporary Italian Judaism \nABSTRACT. The essay retraces the salient passages of the juridical condition of the Jews of Italy, from the second emancipation (1848) onwards, around the pivotal principles of community autonomy and individual belonging, which during the different eras - liberal, fascist, republican - have taken on different normative qualifications and consequent historical meanings. The historical perspective thus illustrates the unique and paradigmatic character of the Jewish case for the tension that has gradually been established between institutional reasons and individual demands, between the 'necessity' of the community and the 'freedom' of the Jews. From the reconstruction it emerges how, in the different moments, the initiative of the minority prevailed over the action of the State, mostly called upon to acknowledge the requests and solicitations of the Jewish leadership. \nSOMMARIO - 1. Premessa - 2. Tra emancipazione e tradizione. Modelli comunitari in età liberale - 3. Dal Consorzio delle Università israelitiche alla legge del 1930 - 4. L’autonomia confessionale. L’intesa con lo Stato e lo statuto dell’Unione delle Comunità ebraiche del 1987 - 5. Cenni conclusivi.","PeriodicalId":516304,"journal":{"name":"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Per legge o per statuto. Appartenenza e autonomia nell’esperienza giuridica dell’ebraismo italiano contemporaneo\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Dazzetti\",\"doi\":\"10.54103/1971-8543/22380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By law or by statute. Belonging and autonomy in the legal experience of contemporary Italian Judaism \\nABSTRACT. The essay retraces the salient passages of the juridical condition of the Jews of Italy, from the second emancipation (1848) onwards, around the pivotal principles of community autonomy and individual belonging, which during the different eras - liberal, fascist, republican - have taken on different normative qualifications and consequent historical meanings. The historical perspective thus illustrates the unique and paradigmatic character of the Jewish case for the tension that has gradually been established between institutional reasons and individual demands, between the 'necessity' of the community and the 'freedom' of the Jews. From the reconstruction it emerges how, in the different moments, the initiative of the minority prevailed over the action of the State, mostly called upon to acknowledge the requests and solicitations of the Jewish leadership. \\nSOMMARIO - 1. Premessa - 2. Tra emancipazione e tradizione. Modelli comunitari in età liberale - 3. Dal Consorzio delle Università israelitiche alla legge del 1930 - 4. L’autonomia confessionale. L’intesa con lo Stato e lo statuto dell’Unione delle Comunità ebraiche del 1987 - 5. Cenni conclusivi.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/22380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/22380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
根据法律或法规。当代意大利犹太教法律经验中的归属与自治 ABSTRACT.本文围绕社区自治和个人归属这两项关键原则,追溯了意大利犹太人从第二次解放(1848 年)以来的司法状况的重要历程,这两项原则在不同的时代--自由、法西斯、共和--具有不同的规范性和相应的历史意义。因此,从历史的角度来看,犹太人的情况具有独特性和典型性,在制度原因和个人要求之间,在社区的 "必要性 "和犹太人的 "自由 "之间,逐渐形成了紧张关系。从重建过程中可以看出,在不同的时刻,少数群体的主动性是如何战胜国家的行动的,而国家的行动大多是为了满足犹太人领导层的要求和请求。SOMMARIO - 1.Premessa - 2.Tra emancipazione e tradizione.Modelli comunitari in età liberale - 3.Dal Consorzio delle Università israelitiche alla legge del 1930 - 4.L'autonomia confessionale.L'intesa con lo Stato e lo statuto dell'Unione del delle Comunità ebraiche del 1987 - 5.Cenni conclusivi.
Per legge o per statuto. Appartenenza e autonomia nell’esperienza giuridica dell’ebraismo italiano contemporaneo
By law or by statute. Belonging and autonomy in the legal experience of contemporary Italian Judaism
ABSTRACT. The essay retraces the salient passages of the juridical condition of the Jews of Italy, from the second emancipation (1848) onwards, around the pivotal principles of community autonomy and individual belonging, which during the different eras - liberal, fascist, republican - have taken on different normative qualifications and consequent historical meanings. The historical perspective thus illustrates the unique and paradigmatic character of the Jewish case for the tension that has gradually been established between institutional reasons and individual demands, between the 'necessity' of the community and the 'freedom' of the Jews. From the reconstruction it emerges how, in the different moments, the initiative of the minority prevailed over the action of the State, mostly called upon to acknowledge the requests and solicitations of the Jewish leadership.
SOMMARIO - 1. Premessa - 2. Tra emancipazione e tradizione. Modelli comunitari in età liberale - 3. Dal Consorzio delle Università israelitiche alla legge del 1930 - 4. L’autonomia confessionale. L’intesa con lo Stato e lo statuto dell’Unione delle Comunità ebraiche del 1987 - 5. Cenni conclusivi.