用于直流电机调谐的模糊逻辑调速器

Wasim Raza, Dieky Adzikya, Saba Mehmood, Syeda Rabbia Wasti, Muhammad Jafar Hussain, Aftab Ahmad, Muhammad Talha Usman, Sajid Raza
{"title":"用于直流电机调谐的模糊逻辑调速器","authors":"Wasim Raza, Dieky Adzikya, Saba Mehmood, Syeda Rabbia Wasti, Muhammad Jafar Hussain, Aftab Ahmad, Muhammad Talha Usman, Sajid Raza","doi":"10.31764/jtam.v8i1.16919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A D.C. motor's rotational speed is regulated in this study using a PID controller and a fuzzy logic controller. In contrast to the fuzzy logic controller, which uses rules based on knowledge and experience, the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller requires a mathematical system model.   This study investigates the regulation of a DC motor's velocity using PID and fuzzy logic controllers. The PID controller utilizes a mathematical model and parameter tuning by trial and error. Still, the fuzzy logic controller (FLC) operates on rule-based knowledge, enabling it to handle the nonlinear features of the DC motor effectively. The FLC design entails intricate determinations, including the establishment of a rule base and the process of fuzzification. A total of 49 fuzzy rules have been devised to achieve precise control. Based on MATLAB/SIMULINK simulations, the study concludes that the Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) beats the Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller. The FLC exhibits superior transient and steady-state responses, shorter response times, reduced steady-state errors, and higher precision. This study emphasizes the efficacy of the FLC (Fuzzy Logic Controller) in dealing with the difficulties associated with DC motor control. It presents a strong argument for the suitability and efficiency of FLCs in industrial environments compared to conventional PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) controllers. There are a wide variety of ways to construct a fuzzy logic controller. The speed error and the rate of change in the speed error are two inputs to the FLC. Defuzzification is done by focusing on the core of the problem. The results show that FLC is superior to PID controllers in efficiency and effectiveness due to its reduced transient and steady-state factors.","PeriodicalId":489521,"journal":{"name":"JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)","volume":"100 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy Logic Speed Regulator for D.C. Motor Tuning\",\"authors\":\"Wasim Raza, Dieky Adzikya, Saba Mehmood, Syeda Rabbia Wasti, Muhammad Jafar Hussain, Aftab Ahmad, Muhammad Talha Usman, Sajid Raza\",\"doi\":\"10.31764/jtam.v8i1.16919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A D.C. motor's rotational speed is regulated in this study using a PID controller and a fuzzy logic controller. In contrast to the fuzzy logic controller, which uses rules based on knowledge and experience, the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller requires a mathematical system model.   This study investigates the regulation of a DC motor's velocity using PID and fuzzy logic controllers. The PID controller utilizes a mathematical model and parameter tuning by trial and error. Still, the fuzzy logic controller (FLC) operates on rule-based knowledge, enabling it to handle the nonlinear features of the DC motor effectively. The FLC design entails intricate determinations, including the establishment of a rule base and the process of fuzzification. A total of 49 fuzzy rules have been devised to achieve precise control. Based on MATLAB/SIMULINK simulations, the study concludes that the Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) beats the Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller. The FLC exhibits superior transient and steady-state responses, shorter response times, reduced steady-state errors, and higher precision. This study emphasizes the efficacy of the FLC (Fuzzy Logic Controller) in dealing with the difficulties associated with DC motor control. It presents a strong argument for the suitability and efficiency of FLCs in industrial environments compared to conventional PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) controllers. There are a wide variety of ways to construct a fuzzy logic controller. The speed error and the rate of change in the speed error are two inputs to the FLC. Defuzzification is done by focusing on the core of the problem. The results show that FLC is superior to PID controllers in efficiency and effectiveness due to its reduced transient and steady-state factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)\",\"volume\":\"100 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v8i1.16919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v8i1.16919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用 PID 控制器和模糊逻辑控制器调节直流电机的转速。与使用基于知识和经验的规则的模糊逻辑控制器相比,比例-积分-派生(PID)控制器需要一个数学系统模型。 本研究探讨了使用 PID 控制器和模糊逻辑控制器调节直流电机速度的问题。PID 控制器利用数学模型,并通过试验和误差来调整参数。而模糊逻辑控制器(FLC)则以规则知识为基础,能有效处理直流电机的非线性特性。FLC 的设计需要复杂的确定过程,包括建立规则库和模糊化过程。为实现精确控制,共设计了 49 条模糊规则。基于 MATLAB/SIMULINK 仿真,研究得出结论,模糊逻辑控制器 (FLC) 优于比例-积分-微分 (PID) 控制器。FLC 的瞬态和稳态响应更出色,响应时间更短,稳态误差更小,精度更高。本研究强调了 FLC(模糊逻辑控制器)在解决直流电机控制相关难题方面的功效。与传统的 PID(比例-中性-微分)控制器相比,它有力地证明了 FLC 在工业环境中的适用性和效率。构建模糊逻辑控制器的方法多种多样。速度误差和速度误差变化率是 FLC 的两个输入。去模糊化是通过关注问题的核心来完成的。结果表明,由于减少了瞬态和稳态因素,FLC 在效率和效果上都优于 PID 控制器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fuzzy Logic Speed Regulator for D.C. Motor Tuning
A D.C. motor's rotational speed is regulated in this study using a PID controller and a fuzzy logic controller. In contrast to the fuzzy logic controller, which uses rules based on knowledge and experience, the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller requires a mathematical system model.   This study investigates the regulation of a DC motor's velocity using PID and fuzzy logic controllers. The PID controller utilizes a mathematical model and parameter tuning by trial and error. Still, the fuzzy logic controller (FLC) operates on rule-based knowledge, enabling it to handle the nonlinear features of the DC motor effectively. The FLC design entails intricate determinations, including the establishment of a rule base and the process of fuzzification. A total of 49 fuzzy rules have been devised to achieve precise control. Based on MATLAB/SIMULINK simulations, the study concludes that the Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) beats the Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller. The FLC exhibits superior transient and steady-state responses, shorter response times, reduced steady-state errors, and higher precision. This study emphasizes the efficacy of the FLC (Fuzzy Logic Controller) in dealing with the difficulties associated with DC motor control. It presents a strong argument for the suitability and efficiency of FLCs in industrial environments compared to conventional PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) controllers. There are a wide variety of ways to construct a fuzzy logic controller. The speed error and the rate of change in the speed error are two inputs to the FLC. Defuzzification is done by focusing on the core of the problem. The results show that FLC is superior to PID controllers in efficiency and effectiveness due to its reduced transient and steady-state factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rainfall Forecasting Using an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System with a Grid Partitioning Approach to Mitigating Flood Disasters Projection of PT Aneka Tambang Tbk Share Risk Value Based on Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network Forecasting Result Exploring Multivariate Copula Models and Fuzzy Interest Rates in Assessing Family Annuity Products Development of a Desmos-Assisted Planar Analytic Geometry Textbook to Support High Order Thinking Skills Identifying Factors Affecting Waste Generation in West Java in 2021 Using Spatial Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1