通过圆桌会议策略学习英语写作;策略的有效性

R. R. Setyaningrum
{"title":"通过圆桌会议策略学习英语写作;策略的有效性","authors":"R. R. Setyaningrum","doi":"10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roundtable strategy is one of the teacher’s efforts in improving the students’ writing English skill. The effectiveness of this strategy has not been proven yet, so this research done to find out the effectiveness of roundtable in learning writing English. The design of research was pre-experimental. The research was done for five meetings to the seventh grade at MTs Nurul Jadid. The data collection were calculated and analyzed by Statistical Product Service Solution (SPSS) 22. The result showed the significance value of pretest was0.074 and post-test was 0.176. The significance value was greater than 0.05, it means the data were normally distributed. The test of hypothesis used paired sample t-test. It showed the sig (2-tailed) value was 0.00. The sig (2-tailed) value was smaller than 0.05. Then Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. Finally, the effectiveness of roundtable in teaching writing descriptive text showed in hypothesis testing by paired sample t-test and N-Gain score to measure it. N-Gain score was 51%. The conclusion of roundtable strategy was less effective for the seventh grade at MTs. Nurul Jadid Lamongan. The researcher may do collaboration round-table strategy with another strategy to upgrade the students’ writing ability.","PeriodicalId":432026,"journal":{"name":"TELL-US JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEARNING WRITING ENGLISH BY ROUND-TABLE STRATEGY; THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGY\",\"authors\":\"R. R. Setyaningrum\",\"doi\":\"10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Roundtable strategy is one of the teacher’s efforts in improving the students’ writing English skill. The effectiveness of this strategy has not been proven yet, so this research done to find out the effectiveness of roundtable in learning writing English. The design of research was pre-experimental. The research was done for five meetings to the seventh grade at MTs Nurul Jadid. The data collection were calculated and analyzed by Statistical Product Service Solution (SPSS) 22. The result showed the significance value of pretest was0.074 and post-test was 0.176. The significance value was greater than 0.05, it means the data were normally distributed. The test of hypothesis used paired sample t-test. It showed the sig (2-tailed) value was 0.00. The sig (2-tailed) value was smaller than 0.05. Then Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. Finally, the effectiveness of roundtable in teaching writing descriptive text showed in hypothesis testing by paired sample t-test and N-Gain score to measure it. N-Gain score was 51%. The conclusion of roundtable strategy was less effective for the seventh grade at MTs. Nurul Jadid Lamongan. The researcher may do collaboration round-table strategy with another strategy to upgrade the students’ writing ability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TELL-US JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TELL-US JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TELL-US JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圆桌策略是教师提高学生英语写作能力的方法之一。该策略的有效性尚未得到证实,因此本研究旨在了解圆桌讨论在英语写作学习中的有效性。研究设计为预实验。研究在努鲁尔-贾迪德 MTs 七年级进行了五次会议。收集的数据通过统计产品服务解决方案(SPSS)22进行计算和分析。结果显示,前测的显著值为 0.074,后测的显著值为 0.176。显著值大于 0.05,说明数据呈正态分布。假设检验采用配对样本 t 检验。结果显示,显著性(双尾)值为 0.00。Sig(双尾)值小于 0.05。因此,Ho 被否定,Ha 被接受。最后,在假设检验中,通过配对样本 t 检验和 N-Gain得分来衡量圆桌讨论在写作描述性文本教学中的有效性。N-Gain 得分为 51%。结论是圆桌会议策略对 MTs 七年级的效果较差。Nurul Jadid Lamongan.研究人员可以将圆桌策略与其他策略结合起来,以提高学生的写作能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LEARNING WRITING ENGLISH BY ROUND-TABLE STRATEGY; THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGY
Roundtable strategy is one of the teacher’s efforts in improving the students’ writing English skill. The effectiveness of this strategy has not been proven yet, so this research done to find out the effectiveness of roundtable in learning writing English. The design of research was pre-experimental. The research was done for five meetings to the seventh grade at MTs Nurul Jadid. The data collection were calculated and analyzed by Statistical Product Service Solution (SPSS) 22. The result showed the significance value of pretest was0.074 and post-test was 0.176. The significance value was greater than 0.05, it means the data were normally distributed. The test of hypothesis used paired sample t-test. It showed the sig (2-tailed) value was 0.00. The sig (2-tailed) value was smaller than 0.05. Then Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. Finally, the effectiveness of roundtable in teaching writing descriptive text showed in hypothesis testing by paired sample t-test and N-Gain score to measure it. N-Gain score was 51%. The conclusion of roundtable strategy was less effective for the seventh grade at MTs. Nurul Jadid Lamongan. The researcher may do collaboration round-table strategy with another strategy to upgrade the students’ writing ability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OPTIMIZING THE USE OF AUTHENTIC MATERIALS IN THE WORD FORMATION PROCESS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING IN THE ENGLISH MORPHOLOGY SUBJECT EFL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE LISTENING COURSES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC DEMYSTIFYING STUDENT NEEDS IN NON-ENGLISH PROGRAMS FOR ENGLISH-SPECIFIC PURPOSES CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES BETWEEN AN EFL TEACHER’S BELIEFS AND CLASSROOM PRACTICES IN TEACHING SPEAKING EXPLORING OF LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE IN ELEMENTARY LEARNERS: CHALLENGES AND BARRIERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1