刑事案件中司法最高上诉的宪法本质

Maksim S. Mateykovich, Ekaterina S. Sentyakova
{"title":"刑事案件中司法最高上诉的宪法本质","authors":"Maksim S. Mateykovich, Ekaterina S. Sentyakova","doi":"10.18572/1812-3791-2024-1-26-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article proves that cassation in criminal cases, thanks to the judicial reform carried out in 2018 and amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation introduced in 2020, has become a cross-cutting legal institution, including, first of all, the norms of constitutional law, which ensures real constitutional guarantees to ensure the legality of sentences and other decisions in criminal cases based on the principles of fairness, legal certainty, independence of courts and independence of judges.","PeriodicalId":221748,"journal":{"name":"Russian judge","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Constitutional Essence of Judicial Cassation in Criminal Cases\",\"authors\":\"Maksim S. Mateykovich, Ekaterina S. Sentyakova\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-3791-2024-1-26-30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article proves that cassation in criminal cases, thanks to the judicial reform carried out in 2018 and amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation introduced in 2020, has become a cross-cutting legal institution, including, first of all, the norms of constitutional law, which ensures real constitutional guarantees to ensure the legality of sentences and other decisions in criminal cases based on the principles of fairness, legal certainty, independence of courts and independence of judges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian judge\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian judge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2024-1-26-30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian judge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2024-1-26-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章证明,由于 2018 年进行的司法改革和 2020 年推出的《俄罗斯联邦宪法》修正案,刑事案件的撤销原判已成为一项贯穿各领域的法律制度,首先包括宪法规范,它确保了真正的宪法保障,以确保在公平、法律确定性、法院独立性和法官独立性原则的基础上,刑事案件判决和其他裁决的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Constitutional Essence of Judicial Cassation in Criminal Cases
The article proves that cassation in criminal cases, thanks to the judicial reform carried out in 2018 and amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation introduced in 2020, has become a cross-cutting legal institution, including, first of all, the norms of constitutional law, which ensures real constitutional guarantees to ensure the legality of sentences and other decisions in criminal cases based on the principles of fairness, legal certainty, independence of courts and independence of judges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Participation of Volunteers in the Implementation of Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 10-FZ on Probation in the Russian Federation dated February 6, 2023 Environmental Migration: A Voluntary Relocation or a Forced Measure — Constitutional and Legal Aspects Special Rulings in Arbitral Proceedings: Certain Issues of Law Enforcement On the Need to Enhance the Procedural Role of Judicial Assistants Labor Function as a Labor-Law Element of Professional Activities of Judges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1