谜题:从纳税人的角度看,《多边投资协定》后中国的税收协定似乎没有变化?

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW Intertax Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2024005
Yansheng Zhu, Zining Tao
{"title":"谜题:从纳税人的角度看,《多边投资协定》后中国的税收协定似乎没有变化?","authors":"Yansheng Zhu, Zining Tao","doi":"10.54648/taxi2024005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses the rule-standard spectrum theory to analyse the puzzle of why taxpayers may have the impression that China’s covered tax agreements (CTAs) seem unchanged after theMultilateral Instrument (MLI) despite the country having devoted enormous efforts to implementing it. This study finds that most of the changes in China’s CTAs through the MLI are standard-based provisions while it is willing to unilaterally and bilaterally embrace certain rule-based MLI provisions. The characteristics of China’s model in adopting the MLI, the possible reasons behind the model, and the implications for taxpayers are further explored.\nMLI, China’s CTAs, standard-based changes, rule-based changes, administrative-led legislative model, multi-dimensional tax policies, compliance cost, certainty and uncertainty, cooperation","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Puzzle: China’s Covered Tax Agreements Seem Unchanged after the MLI from Taxpayers’ Perspective?\",\"authors\":\"Yansheng Zhu, Zining Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/taxi2024005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article uses the rule-standard spectrum theory to analyse the puzzle of why taxpayers may have the impression that China’s covered tax agreements (CTAs) seem unchanged after theMultilateral Instrument (MLI) despite the country having devoted enormous efforts to implementing it. This study finds that most of the changes in China’s CTAs through the MLI are standard-based provisions while it is willing to unilaterally and bilaterally embrace certain rule-based MLI provisions. The characteristics of China’s model in adopting the MLI, the possible reasons behind the model, and the implications for taxpayers are further explored.\\nMLI, China’s CTAs, standard-based changes, rule-based changes, administrative-led legislative model, multi-dimensional tax policies, compliance cost, certainty and uncertainty, cooperation\",\"PeriodicalId\":45365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intertax\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intertax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2024005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2024005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文运用规则-标准谱系理论分析了为什么纳税人可能会有这样的印象,即尽管中国在执行《多边投资协定》(MLI)方面付出了巨大努力,但《多边投资协定》(MLI)之后中国的税收协定(CTAs)似乎没有变化。本研究发现,中国通过 MLI 对 CTA 所做的修改大多是基于标准的条款,而中国愿意单边和双边接受某些基于规则的 MLI 条款。本研究进一步探讨了中国采用多边投资协定模式的特点、该模式背后的可能原因以及对纳税人的影响。 多边投资协定、中国的 CTAs、基于标准的变化、基于规则的变化、行政主导型立法模式、多维度税收政策、遵从成本、确定性和不确定性、合作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Puzzle: China’s Covered Tax Agreements Seem Unchanged after the MLI from Taxpayers’ Perspective?
This article uses the rule-standard spectrum theory to analyse the puzzle of why taxpayers may have the impression that China’s covered tax agreements (CTAs) seem unchanged after theMultilateral Instrument (MLI) despite the country having devoted enormous efforts to implementing it. This study finds that most of the changes in China’s CTAs through the MLI are standard-based provisions while it is willing to unilaterally and bilaterally embrace certain rule-based MLI provisions. The characteristics of China’s model in adopting the MLI, the possible reasons behind the model, and the implications for taxpayers are further explored. MLI, China’s CTAs, standard-based changes, rule-based changes, administrative-led legislative model, multi-dimensional tax policies, compliance cost, certainty and uncertainty, cooperation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
(In)congruence Between Taxation, Spending, and Representation: The Ambiguous Character of Tax-based Contributions Taxing Powers of the European Union Judicial Review of the EU Own Resources Decision by the ECJ Protecting EU Financial Interests in the Collection of Tax-Based Own Resources Article: Conflicts between Directives that Require Taxation of Income and Tax Treaties: The Effectiveness of the EU Primacy-based Conflict Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1