防砂下部完井中的破碎器安置--新挑战和潜在解决方案

M. Byrne, L. Djayapertapa, K. Watson
{"title":"防砂下部完井中的破碎器安置--新挑战和潜在解决方案","authors":"M. Byrne, L. Djayapertapa, K. Watson","doi":"10.2118/217914-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Production and injection wells for oil and gas and carbon storage reservoirs often require sand control across the reservoir section to enable fluids to flow and to prevent larger formation solids from moving. In many of these wells, chemical breaker treatments are pumped prior to production or injection to help to reduce any drilling or completion induced formation or completion damage. Delivering these breakers to the target such as residual drilling mud cake can be challenging and rules of thumb have often been used to guide this process. More rigorous methods to optimise breaker placement and design are now available.\n CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) enables fluid flow in complex geometries to be modelled and predicted. Breaker placement during the well completion process involves the complex geometry of the well, the lower completion and the reservoir and fluid flow or displacement. The full geometry of vertical or horizontal wells, with induced fractures, multiple wellbores, perforations or mini-bores should and can be captured using CFD. Breaker pumping whether bull-headed, through a wash pipe, coiled tubing or more sophisticated rotating and jetting needs to be simulated in order to determine its efficiency.\n Numerous simulations for different well types, completions and breaker deployment methods have revealed that even with the best intentions and rules of thumb, it can be challenging to place breaker to the target and for breaker concentrations required for efficient dissolution of residual damage to be maintained. In particular gravel packed completions present challenges. Fluids will always take the path of least resistance and in gravel packed completions this is often back up the well between the wash pipe and the screens missing the intended target. The additional resistance of the gravel in the annulus tends to prevent efficient breaker penetration to mud cake or perforations beyond. If the breaker does penetrate, then coverage of the damaged zone can be patchy and early losses can result. Simulations have also identified potential mitigations such as alternative deployment rates, displacement fluids prior to breakers and duration of breaker placement. The benefits of targeted breaker placement during pump and pull or jetting operations has also been evaluated.\n Challenges in placing breaker effectively in sand controlled wells are addressed using complex numerical modelling. Replicating well geometry and all fluid flow paths are essential in order to optimise breaker placement and reduce residual formation and completion damage. The methods and examples shared will enable more effective clean-up of oil, gas, water, hydrogen and CO2 wells.","PeriodicalId":518880,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, February 22, 2024","volume":"182 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaker Placement in Sand Control Lower Completions – New Challenges and Potential Solutions\",\"authors\":\"M. Byrne, L. Djayapertapa, K. Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/217914-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Production and injection wells for oil and gas and carbon storage reservoirs often require sand control across the reservoir section to enable fluids to flow and to prevent larger formation solids from moving. In many of these wells, chemical breaker treatments are pumped prior to production or injection to help to reduce any drilling or completion induced formation or completion damage. Delivering these breakers to the target such as residual drilling mud cake can be challenging and rules of thumb have often been used to guide this process. More rigorous methods to optimise breaker placement and design are now available.\\n CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) enables fluid flow in complex geometries to be modelled and predicted. Breaker placement during the well completion process involves the complex geometry of the well, the lower completion and the reservoir and fluid flow or displacement. The full geometry of vertical or horizontal wells, with induced fractures, multiple wellbores, perforations or mini-bores should and can be captured using CFD. Breaker pumping whether bull-headed, through a wash pipe, coiled tubing or more sophisticated rotating and jetting needs to be simulated in order to determine its efficiency.\\n Numerous simulations for different well types, completions and breaker deployment methods have revealed that even with the best intentions and rules of thumb, it can be challenging to place breaker to the target and for breaker concentrations required for efficient dissolution of residual damage to be maintained. In particular gravel packed completions present challenges. Fluids will always take the path of least resistance and in gravel packed completions this is often back up the well between the wash pipe and the screens missing the intended target. The additional resistance of the gravel in the annulus tends to prevent efficient breaker penetration to mud cake or perforations beyond. If the breaker does penetrate, then coverage of the damaged zone can be patchy and early losses can result. Simulations have also identified potential mitigations such as alternative deployment rates, displacement fluids prior to breakers and duration of breaker placement. The benefits of targeted breaker placement during pump and pull or jetting operations has also been evaluated.\\n Challenges in placing breaker effectively in sand controlled wells are addressed using complex numerical modelling. Replicating well geometry and all fluid flow paths are essential in order to optimise breaker placement and reduce residual formation and completion damage. The methods and examples shared will enable more effective clean-up of oil, gas, water, hydrogen and CO2 wells.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Thu, February 22, 2024\",\"volume\":\"182 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Thu, February 22, 2024\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/217914-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, February 22, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217914-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

油气和碳储层的生产井和注水井通常需要在整个储层段进行防砂处理,以确保流体流动,并防止较大的地层固体移动。在许多这样的油井中,生产或注入前都会泵入化学破碎剂,以帮助减少钻井或完井引起的地层或完井损害。将这些破碎剂输送到目标(如残留的钻井泥饼)可能具有挑战性,通常使用经验法则来指导这一过程。现在有了更严格的方法来优化破碎器的放置和设计。CFD(计算流体动力学)可以对复杂几何形状中的流体流动进行建模和预测。完井过程中的破碎器布置涉及到油井、下部完井和储层的复杂几何形状以及流体流动或位移。垂直井或水平井的全部几何形状,包括诱导裂缝、多井眼、射孔或微型井眼,都应使用 CFD 加以捕捉。无论是牛头式、通过洗井管、盘管式还是更复杂的旋转和喷射式破碎机泵送,都需要进行模拟,以确定其效率。针对不同的油井类型、完井方式和破碎剂部署方法进行的大量模拟显示,即使有最好的意图和经验法则,要将破碎剂部署到目标位置,并保持高效溶解残余损害所需的破碎剂浓度,也是一项挑战。特别是砾石填料完井带来的挑战。流体总是会选择阻力最小的路径,而在砾石充填完井中,阻力最小的路径往往是在洗井管和滤网之间的井中回流,从而错过了预定的目标。环空中砾石的额外阻力往往会阻碍破碎器有效穿透泥饼或射孔。如果破碎剂确实穿透,那么受损区域的覆盖范围可能是零散的,并可能导致早期损失。模拟还确定了潜在的缓解措施,如替代部署率、破碎剂之前的置换流体以及破碎剂放置的持续时间。此外,还评估了在泵拉或喷射作业期间有针对性地放置破碎锤的好处。通过复杂的数值建模,解决了在砂控井中有效放置断流器的难题。复制油井几何形状和所有流体流动路径对于优化断路器安放、减少残留地层和完井损害至关重要。分享的方法和实例将有助于更有效地清理油井、气井、水井、氢井和二氧化碳井。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Breaker Placement in Sand Control Lower Completions – New Challenges and Potential Solutions
Production and injection wells for oil and gas and carbon storage reservoirs often require sand control across the reservoir section to enable fluids to flow and to prevent larger formation solids from moving. In many of these wells, chemical breaker treatments are pumped prior to production or injection to help to reduce any drilling or completion induced formation or completion damage. Delivering these breakers to the target such as residual drilling mud cake can be challenging and rules of thumb have often been used to guide this process. More rigorous methods to optimise breaker placement and design are now available. CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) enables fluid flow in complex geometries to be modelled and predicted. Breaker placement during the well completion process involves the complex geometry of the well, the lower completion and the reservoir and fluid flow or displacement. The full geometry of vertical or horizontal wells, with induced fractures, multiple wellbores, perforations or mini-bores should and can be captured using CFD. Breaker pumping whether bull-headed, through a wash pipe, coiled tubing or more sophisticated rotating and jetting needs to be simulated in order to determine its efficiency. Numerous simulations for different well types, completions and breaker deployment methods have revealed that even with the best intentions and rules of thumb, it can be challenging to place breaker to the target and for breaker concentrations required for efficient dissolution of residual damage to be maintained. In particular gravel packed completions present challenges. Fluids will always take the path of least resistance and in gravel packed completions this is often back up the well between the wash pipe and the screens missing the intended target. The additional resistance of the gravel in the annulus tends to prevent efficient breaker penetration to mud cake or perforations beyond. If the breaker does penetrate, then coverage of the damaged zone can be patchy and early losses can result. Simulations have also identified potential mitigations such as alternative deployment rates, displacement fluids prior to breakers and duration of breaker placement. The benefits of targeted breaker placement during pump and pull or jetting operations has also been evaluated. Challenges in placing breaker effectively in sand controlled wells are addressed using complex numerical modelling. Replicating well geometry and all fluid flow paths are essential in order to optimise breaker placement and reduce residual formation and completion damage. The methods and examples shared will enable more effective clean-up of oil, gas, water, hydrogen and CO2 wells.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sparse Subsurface Sensor Signal Estimation for Formation Damage Assessment via a Smart Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Reservoir Sandstone Wettability in Relation to Injection Water Salinity and Reservoir Temperature Breaker Placement in Sand Control Lower Completions – New Challenges and Potential Solutions Analyzing Gas Well Productivity Change with Production in Unconsolidated Sandstone Using Rate Transient Analysis Enhanced Injectivity Using Diversion Technology on Hydraulic Fracturing Jobs in Los Llanos Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1