{"title":"多元组合回归的变量选择和推理策略","authors":"Sujin Lee, Sungkyu Jung","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An important problem in compositional data analysis is variable selection in linear regression models with compositional covariates. In the context of microbiome data analysis, there is a demand for considering grouping information such as structures among taxa and multiple sampling sites, resulting in multiple compositional covariates. We develop and compare two different methods of variable selection and inference strategies, based on the debiased lasso and a resampling-based approach. Confidence intervals for individual regression coefficients, obtained from each of the two methods, are shown to be asymptotically valid even in a high-dimension, low-sample-size regime. However, microbiome data often have extremely small sample sizes, rendering asymptotic results unreliable. Through extensive numerical comparisons of the finite-sample performances of the two methods, we find that resampling-based approaches outperform the debiased compositional lasso in cases of extremely small sample sizes, showing higher positive predictive values. Conversely, for larger sample sizes, debiasing yields better results. We apply the proposed multiple compositional regression to steer microbiome data, identifying key bacterial taxa associated with important cattle quality measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9774,"journal":{"name":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 105121"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variable selection and inference strategies for multiple compositional regression\",\"authors\":\"Sujin Lee, Sungkyu Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An important problem in compositional data analysis is variable selection in linear regression models with compositional covariates. In the context of microbiome data analysis, there is a demand for considering grouping information such as structures among taxa and multiple sampling sites, resulting in multiple compositional covariates. We develop and compare two different methods of variable selection and inference strategies, based on the debiased lasso and a resampling-based approach. Confidence intervals for individual regression coefficients, obtained from each of the two methods, are shown to be asymptotically valid even in a high-dimension, low-sample-size regime. However, microbiome data often have extremely small sample sizes, rendering asymptotic results unreliable. Through extensive numerical comparisons of the finite-sample performances of the two methods, we find that resampling-based approaches outperform the debiased compositional lasso in cases of extremely small sample sizes, showing higher positive predictive values. Conversely, for larger sample sizes, debiasing yields better results. We apply the proposed multiple compositional regression to steer microbiome data, identifying key bacterial taxa associated with important cattle quality measures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems\",\"volume\":\"248 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743924000613\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743924000613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variable selection and inference strategies for multiple compositional regression
An important problem in compositional data analysis is variable selection in linear regression models with compositional covariates. In the context of microbiome data analysis, there is a demand for considering grouping information such as structures among taxa and multiple sampling sites, resulting in multiple compositional covariates. We develop and compare two different methods of variable selection and inference strategies, based on the debiased lasso and a resampling-based approach. Confidence intervals for individual regression coefficients, obtained from each of the two methods, are shown to be asymptotically valid even in a high-dimension, low-sample-size regime. However, microbiome data often have extremely small sample sizes, rendering asymptotic results unreliable. Through extensive numerical comparisons of the finite-sample performances of the two methods, we find that resampling-based approaches outperform the debiased compositional lasso in cases of extremely small sample sizes, showing higher positive predictive values. Conversely, for larger sample sizes, debiasing yields better results. We apply the proposed multiple compositional regression to steer microbiome data, identifying key bacterial taxa associated with important cattle quality measures.
期刊介绍:
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems publishes original research papers, short communications, reviews, tutorials and Original Software Publications reporting on development of novel statistical, mathematical, or computer techniques in Chemistry and related disciplines.
Chemometrics is the chemical discipline that uses mathematical and statistical methods to design or select optimal procedures and experiments, and to provide maximum chemical information by analysing chemical data.
The journal deals with the following topics:
1) Development of new statistical, mathematical and chemometrical methods for Chemistry and related fields (Environmental Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology, System Biology, -Omics, etc.)
2) Novel applications of chemometrics to all branches of Chemistry and related fields (typical domains of interest are: process data analysis, experimental design, data mining, signal processing, supervised modelling, decision making, robust statistics, mixture analysis, multivariate calibration etc.) Routine applications of established chemometrical techniques will not be considered.
3) Development of new software that provides novel tools or truly advances the use of chemometrical methods.
4) Well characterized data sets to test performance for the new methods and software.
The journal complies with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors'' Uniform requirements for manuscripts.