具有临床高风险和低风险 70 基因特征的 ER 阳性/HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者接受新辅助内分泌治疗后的放射学、病理学和手术治疗结果

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2024.103726
Josefien P. van Olmen , Chaja F. Jacobs , Sanne A.L. Bartels , Claudette E. Loo , Joyce Sanders , Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. Vrancken Peeters , Caroline A. Drukker , Frederieke H. van Duijnhoven , Marleen Kok
{"title":"具有临床高风险和低风险 70 基因特征的 ER 阳性/HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者接受新辅助内分泌治疗后的放射学、病理学和手术治疗结果","authors":"Josefien P. van Olmen ,&nbsp;Chaja F. Jacobs ,&nbsp;Sanne A.L. Bartels ,&nbsp;Claudette E. Loo ,&nbsp;Joyce Sanders ,&nbsp;Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. Vrancken Peeters ,&nbsp;Caroline A. Drukker ,&nbsp;Frederieke H. van Duijnhoven ,&nbsp;Marleen Kok","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the response to and surgical benefits of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients who are clinically high risk, but genomic low risk according to the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with ER+/HER2-invasive breast cancer with a clinical high risk according to MINDACT, who had a genomic low risk according to the 70-gene signature and were treated with NET between 2015 and 2023 in our center, were retrospectively analyzed. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess radiological response using MRI or ultrasound. Surgical specimens were evaluated to assess pathological response. Two breast cancer surgeons independently scored the eligibility of breast conserving therapy (BCS) pre- and post- NET.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 72 included patients, 23 were premenopausal (100% started with tamoxifen of which 4 also received OFS) and 49 were postmenopausal (98% started with an aromatase inhibitor). Overall, 8 (11%) showed radiological complete response. Only 1 (1.4%) patient had a pathological complete response (RCB-0) and 68 (94.4%) had a pathological partial response (RCB-1 or RCB-2). Among the 26 patients initially considered for mastectomy, 14 (53.8%) underwent successful BCS. In all 20 clinical node-positive patients, a marked axillary lymph node was removed to assess response. Four out of 20 (20%) patients had a pathological complete response of the axilla.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study showed that a subgroup of patients with a clinical high risk and a genomic low risk ER+/HER2-breast cancer benefits from NET resulting in BCS instead of a mastectomy. Additionally, NET may enable de-escalation in axillary treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 103726"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624000572/pdfft?md5=867505bc41e17ebd169e0f211be78d48&pid=1-s2.0-S0960977624000572-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiological, pathological and surgical outcomes after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with a clinical high risk and a low-risk 70-gene signature\",\"authors\":\"Josefien P. van Olmen ,&nbsp;Chaja F. Jacobs ,&nbsp;Sanne A.L. Bartels ,&nbsp;Claudette E. Loo ,&nbsp;Joyce Sanders ,&nbsp;Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. Vrancken Peeters ,&nbsp;Caroline A. Drukker ,&nbsp;Frederieke H. van Duijnhoven ,&nbsp;Marleen Kok\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the response to and surgical benefits of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients who are clinically high risk, but genomic low risk according to the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with ER+/HER2-invasive breast cancer with a clinical high risk according to MINDACT, who had a genomic low risk according to the 70-gene signature and were treated with NET between 2015 and 2023 in our center, were retrospectively analyzed. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess radiological response using MRI or ultrasound. Surgical specimens were evaluated to assess pathological response. Two breast cancer surgeons independently scored the eligibility of breast conserving therapy (BCS) pre- and post- NET.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 72 included patients, 23 were premenopausal (100% started with tamoxifen of which 4 also received OFS) and 49 were postmenopausal (98% started with an aromatase inhibitor). Overall, 8 (11%) showed radiological complete response. Only 1 (1.4%) patient had a pathological complete response (RCB-0) and 68 (94.4%) had a pathological partial response (RCB-1 or RCB-2). Among the 26 patients initially considered for mastectomy, 14 (53.8%) underwent successful BCS. In all 20 clinical node-positive patients, a marked axillary lymph node was removed to assess response. Four out of 20 (20%) patients had a pathological complete response of the axilla.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study showed that a subgroup of patients with a clinical high risk and a genomic low risk ER+/HER2-breast cancer benefits from NET resulting in BCS instead of a mastectomy. Additionally, NET may enable de-escalation in axillary treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624000572/pdfft?md5=867505bc41e17ebd169e0f211be78d48&pid=1-s2.0-S0960977624000572-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624000572\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624000572","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估根据 70 基因特征(MammaPrint)判断为临床高风险但基因组低风险的 ER+/HER2 乳腺癌患者对新辅助内分泌治疗(NET)的反应和手术获益。方法对根据MINDACT诊断为临床高风险的ER+/HER2浸润性乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者根据70基因特征诊断为基因组低风险,并在2015年至2023年间在本中心接受了NET治疗。采用RECIST 1.1标准通过核磁共振成像或超声波评估放射学反应。对手术标本进行评估,以评估病理反应。两名乳腺癌外科医生分别对NET前后的保乳治疗(BCS)资格进行了独立评分。结果 在纳入的72例患者中,23例为绝经前患者(100%开始使用他莫昔芬,其中4例还接受了OFS治疗),49例为绝经后患者(98%开始使用芳香化酶抑制剂)。总体而言,8 例(11%)患者出现放射学完全反应。只有 1 名患者(1.4%)出现病理完全反应(RCB-0),68 名患者(94.4%)出现病理部分反应(RCB-1 或 RCB-2)。在最初考虑进行乳房切除术的 26 名患者中,14 人(53.8%)成功接受了 BCS。在所有20例临床结节阳性患者中,均切除了一个明显的腋窝淋巴结以评估反应。该研究表明,临床高风险和基因组低风险 ER+/HER2 乳腺癌患者中的一个亚群可从 NET 中获益,从而以 BCS 取代乳房切除术。此外,NET可使腋窝治疗降级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiological, pathological and surgical outcomes after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with a clinical high risk and a low-risk 70-gene signature

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the response to and surgical benefits of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients who are clinically high risk, but genomic low risk according to the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint).

Methods

Patients with ER+/HER2-invasive breast cancer with a clinical high risk according to MINDACT, who had a genomic low risk according to the 70-gene signature and were treated with NET between 2015 and 2023 in our center, were retrospectively analyzed. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess radiological response using MRI or ultrasound. Surgical specimens were evaluated to assess pathological response. Two breast cancer surgeons independently scored the eligibility of breast conserving therapy (BCS) pre- and post- NET.

Results

Of 72 included patients, 23 were premenopausal (100% started with tamoxifen of which 4 also received OFS) and 49 were postmenopausal (98% started with an aromatase inhibitor). Overall, 8 (11%) showed radiological complete response. Only 1 (1.4%) patient had a pathological complete response (RCB-0) and 68 (94.4%) had a pathological partial response (RCB-1 or RCB-2). Among the 26 patients initially considered for mastectomy, 14 (53.8%) underwent successful BCS. In all 20 clinical node-positive patients, a marked axillary lymph node was removed to assess response. Four out of 20 (20%) patients had a pathological complete response of the axilla.

Conclusion

The study showed that a subgroup of patients with a clinical high risk and a genomic low risk ER+/HER2-breast cancer benefits from NET resulting in BCS instead of a mastectomy. Additionally, NET may enable de-escalation in axillary treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Italy: A Senonetwork analysis of 37,215 patients treated from 2017 to 2022. Treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer: The role of patient selection. Targeted therapeutic strategies for Nectin-4 in breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects. Current and future burden of breast cancer in Asia: A GLOBOCAN data analysis for 2022 and 2050 Olaparib monotherapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer patients with homologous recombination deficiency and without germline mutations in BRCA1/2: The NOBROLA phase 2 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1