Matilda Fransson , Benoit Cordonnier , Ramon Zimmermanns , Paul R. Shearing , Alexander Rack , Ludovic Broche
{"title":"重建电池大体积 X 射线断层成像的拼接技术比较","authors":"Matilda Fransson , Benoit Cordonnier , Ramon Zimmermanns , Paul R. Shearing , Alexander Rack , Ludovic Broche","doi":"10.1016/j.tmater.2024.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography (μCT) is a valuable technique to study the internal structure of heterogeneous samples with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, synchrotron X-ray imaging, such as many microscopy methods, is solidly limited by its Field of View (FOV): a challenge when approaching large and/or highly detailed volumes at high spatial imaging resolution. In this study, we consider two techniques used to increase the FOV in µCT for studying Li-ion batteries, Local Tomography Stitching (LTS) and Sinogram Oriented Stitching (SOS), and compare in terms of scan time, processing efficiency and computing storage. We complement our study by estimating the impact of different battery geometries on the stitching performance for similar scanning parameters. Evaluation of the two presented techniques reveals that both provide equally satisfyingly stitched volumes. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that SOS is predominantly more efficient for the considered battery geometries, requires fewer scans in total, and hence has a lower time and storage demand in comparison to LTS. However, technical constraints make the SOS technique more difficult to implement. Further discussed are differences in acquisition and reconstruction for the two techniques, addressing the processing efficiency for both SOS and LTS techniques and we shall provide indicators for selecting the most suitable stitching technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101254,"journal":{"name":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X24000068/pdfft?md5=39d788f96b4d61ee5fc0662c19bf4b41&pid=1-s2.0-S2949673X24000068-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of stitching techniques to reconstruct large volume x-ray tomography of batteries\",\"authors\":\"Matilda Fransson , Benoit Cordonnier , Ramon Zimmermanns , Paul R. Shearing , Alexander Rack , Ludovic Broche\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmater.2024.100029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography (μCT) is a valuable technique to study the internal structure of heterogeneous samples with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, synchrotron X-ray imaging, such as many microscopy methods, is solidly limited by its Field of View (FOV): a challenge when approaching large and/or highly detailed volumes at high spatial imaging resolution. In this study, we consider two techniques used to increase the FOV in µCT for studying Li-ion batteries, Local Tomography Stitching (LTS) and Sinogram Oriented Stitching (SOS), and compare in terms of scan time, processing efficiency and computing storage. We complement our study by estimating the impact of different battery geometries on the stitching performance for similar scanning parameters. Evaluation of the two presented techniques reveals that both provide equally satisfyingly stitched volumes. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that SOS is predominantly more efficient for the considered battery geometries, requires fewer scans in total, and hence has a lower time and storage demand in comparison to LTS. However, technical constraints make the SOS technique more difficult to implement. Further discussed are differences in acquisition and reconstruction for the two techniques, addressing the processing efficiency for both SOS and LTS techniques and we shall provide indicators for selecting the most suitable stitching technique.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tomography of Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X24000068/pdfft?md5=39d788f96b4d61ee5fc0662c19bf4b41&pid=1-s2.0-S2949673X24000068-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tomography of Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X24000068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X24000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
同步辐射 X 射线显微层析成像(μCT)是一项宝贵的技术,可用于研究高空间和时间分辨率的异质样品内部结构。然而,同步辐射 X 射线成像和许多显微镜方法一样,都受到视场(FOV)的严重限制:这是以高空间成像分辨率处理大体积和/或高细节体积时所面临的挑战。在本研究中,我们考虑了用于提高μCT视场(FOV)以研究锂离子电池的两种技术,即局部断层扫描拼接(LTS)和面向中图的拼接(SOS),并在扫描时间、处理效率和计算存储方面进行了比较。我们通过估算不同电池几何形状对类似扫描参数下拼接性能的影响来补充我们的研究。对这两种技术的评估表明,它们都能提供同样令人满意的拼接体积。然而,研究表明,对于所考虑的电池几何形状,SOS 的效率更高,所需的扫描次数更少,因此与 LTS 相比,对时间和存储的需求更低。然而,技术上的限制使得 SOS 技术更难实施。我们将进一步讨论两种技术在采集和重建方面的差异,解决 SOS 和 LTS 技术的处理效率问题,并为选择最合适的拼接技术提供指标。
A comparison of stitching techniques to reconstruct large volume x-ray tomography of batteries
Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography (μCT) is a valuable technique to study the internal structure of heterogeneous samples with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, synchrotron X-ray imaging, such as many microscopy methods, is solidly limited by its Field of View (FOV): a challenge when approaching large and/or highly detailed volumes at high spatial imaging resolution. In this study, we consider two techniques used to increase the FOV in µCT for studying Li-ion batteries, Local Tomography Stitching (LTS) and Sinogram Oriented Stitching (SOS), and compare in terms of scan time, processing efficiency and computing storage. We complement our study by estimating the impact of different battery geometries on the stitching performance for similar scanning parameters. Evaluation of the two presented techniques reveals that both provide equally satisfyingly stitched volumes. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that SOS is predominantly more efficient for the considered battery geometries, requires fewer scans in total, and hence has a lower time and storage demand in comparison to LTS. However, technical constraints make the SOS technique more difficult to implement. Further discussed are differences in acquisition and reconstruction for the two techniques, addressing the processing efficiency for both SOS and LTS techniques and we shall provide indicators for selecting the most suitable stitching technique.