护士临床判断能力问卷的开发与验证:顺序探索性混合方法研究

Ali Dehghani
{"title":"护士临床判断能力问卷的开发与验证:顺序探索性混合方法研究","authors":"Ali Dehghani","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Clinical judgment is one of the most important competencies required for safe care, decision-making, and diagnosis in nursing profession. Therefore, it is necessary to examine clinical judgment in nursing care. Existing a standard questionnaire based on cultural and social conditions can accurately evaluate clinical judgment in nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The present study aimed to develop and validate clinical judgment capability questionnaire in nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The current research was a sequential exploratory mixed method study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>The teaching hospitals affiliated to Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in the South of Iran in 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve clinical nurses were included in the qualitative part and 181 nurses in the quantitative part.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was conducted in two parts: one qualitative and one quantitative. In the qualitative part, the concept of clinical judgment was explored using qualitative content analysis. Then, the initial pool of items was generated to develop a questionnaire. In the quantitative part, psychometric properties of the questionnaire were evaluated including face, content, and structure validity and reliability (internal consistency and stability).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After examining the psychometric properties, 22 items were developed for the final questionnaire. The results of factor analysis led to the extraction of four factors, including noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and its stability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.84.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The developed 22-item questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessment of clinical judgment capability in nurses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000183/pdfft?md5=bdc022b89c1d1c78f0b71136bf3d2d6d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000183-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the clinical judgment capability questionnaire in nurses: A sequential exploratory mixed method study\",\"authors\":\"Ali Dehghani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Clinical judgment is one of the most important competencies required for safe care, decision-making, and diagnosis in nursing profession. Therefore, it is necessary to examine clinical judgment in nursing care. Existing a standard questionnaire based on cultural and social conditions can accurately evaluate clinical judgment in nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The present study aimed to develop and validate clinical judgment capability questionnaire in nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The current research was a sequential exploratory mixed method study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>The teaching hospitals affiliated to Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in the South of Iran in 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve clinical nurses were included in the qualitative part and 181 nurses in the quantitative part.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was conducted in two parts: one qualitative and one quantitative. In the qualitative part, the concept of clinical judgment was explored using qualitative content analysis. Then, the initial pool of items was generated to develop a questionnaire. In the quantitative part, psychometric properties of the questionnaire were evaluated including face, content, and structure validity and reliability (internal consistency and stability).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After examining the psychometric properties, 22 items were developed for the final questionnaire. The results of factor analysis led to the extraction of four factors, including noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and its stability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.84.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The developed 22-item questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessment of clinical judgment capability in nurses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000183/pdfft?md5=bdc022b89c1d1c78f0b71136bf3d2d6d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000183-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景临床判断是护理专业安全护理、决策和诊断所需的最重要能力之一。因此,有必要对护理工作中的临床判断力进行研究。本研究旨在开发并验证护士的临床判断能力问卷。本研究是一项顺序探索性混合方法研究。在定性部分,采用定性内容分析法探讨了临床判断的概念。然后,生成初步的项目库以编制问卷。在定量部分,对问卷的心理测量特性进行了评估,包括面效度、内容效度、结构效度和信度(内部一致性和稳定性)。因子分析的结果提取了四个因子,包括注意、解释、反应和反思。问卷的内部一致性得到了证实,Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.95,稳定性得到了证实,类内相关系数为 0.84。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of the clinical judgment capability questionnaire in nurses: A sequential exploratory mixed method study

Background

Clinical judgment is one of the most important competencies required for safe care, decision-making, and diagnosis in nursing profession. Therefore, it is necessary to examine clinical judgment in nursing care. Existing a standard questionnaire based on cultural and social conditions can accurately evaluate clinical judgment in nurses.

Objective

The present study aimed to develop and validate clinical judgment capability questionnaire in nurses.

Design

The current research was a sequential exploratory mixed method study.

Setting

The teaching hospitals affiliated to Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in the South of Iran in 2023.

Participants

Twelve clinical nurses were included in the qualitative part and 181 nurses in the quantitative part.

Methods

The study was conducted in two parts: one qualitative and one quantitative. In the qualitative part, the concept of clinical judgment was explored using qualitative content analysis. Then, the initial pool of items was generated to develop a questionnaire. In the quantitative part, psychometric properties of the questionnaire were evaluated including face, content, and structure validity and reliability (internal consistency and stability).

Results

After examining the psychometric properties, 22 items were developed for the final questionnaire. The results of factor analysis led to the extraction of four factors, including noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and its stability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.84.

Conclusion

The developed 22-item questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessment of clinical judgment capability in nurses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Facilitators, barriers, and guidance to successful implementation of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions: A qualitative systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research Nurse-surgeons in the Australian public health system: A descriptive quantitative survey Navigating uncertainties for promoting nurse-led changes in work environments: A participatory action research Impact of nurse education prior to and during COVID-19 on nursing students’ preparedness for clinical placement: A qualitative study Conceptualizing healthcare professionals’ relational competence in mental healthcare: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1