小扁豆(Lens culinaris)农场在资源分配中是否具有生产力、利润和效率?尼泊尔横断面研究

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Legume Science Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1002/leg3.217
Binod Ghimire, Shiva Chandra Dhakal, Santosh Marahatta, Ram Chandra Bastakoti
{"title":"小扁豆(Lens culinaris)农场在资源分配中是否具有生产力、利润和效率?尼泊尔横断面研究","authors":"Binod Ghimire,&nbsp;Shiva Chandra Dhakal,&nbsp;Santosh Marahatta,&nbsp;Ram Chandra Bastakoti","doi":"10.1002/leg3.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study was based on primary data from 473 lentil farmers selected randomly to analyze productivity, profitability, efficiency, and sensitivity of lentil farms in Nepal. Methods like benefit–cost, break-even, margin safety, and sensitivity analysis, scaling technique, Cobb–Douglas type of production function, and stochastic frontier were adopted to derive farm economics, allocative, and cost efficiency levels. With average productivity of 672 kg/ha, lentil farmers in the study area were earning about 41% profit as of gross return with a profitability index of 0.78. About 45% margin of safety and estimates of benefit–cost ratio above one on all sensitivity measures is indicative of low risk and robust enterprise. Resources allocated in lentil production were found inefficient, and to achieve maximum return, expenses on land preparation, seed, nutrient, and plant protection cum irrigation should be increased by 27.6%, 80%, 33.1%, and 97%, respectively. Similarly, expenses on labor and harvesting activities need to be decreased by 30.1% and 23.6%. Labor cost and seed cost were the most important variables, and a 1% increase would surge the total production costs by 0.42% and 0.19%, respectively. The cost efficiency was estimated as 1.137 mean value, meaning that over 13.7% of the costs in lentil farms is wasted while comparing best-practiced farm. Only about 48% of farms is fairly efficient at efficiency levels 1.0 to 1.09, but the majority is inefficient, which needs to minimize the waste of resources. Although suffering from climatic risks and production-related problems, lentil enterprise is profitable, less risky, less sensitive, and fairly to inefficient in resource use. Wise attention is need on the part of farm management and resource utilization. Farmers are suggested to maintain farm size around 0.5 ha or below 1 ha, use only improved varietal seed, cut labor expenses with the use of machinery, and perform adequate tillage during sowing followed by effective disease management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17929,"journal":{"name":"Legume Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.217","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Lentil (Lens culinaris) Farms Productive, Profitable, and Efficient in Resource Allocation? A Cross-Sectional Study From Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Binod Ghimire,&nbsp;Shiva Chandra Dhakal,&nbsp;Santosh Marahatta,&nbsp;Ram Chandra Bastakoti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leg3.217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study was based on primary data from 473 lentil farmers selected randomly to analyze productivity, profitability, efficiency, and sensitivity of lentil farms in Nepal. Methods like benefit–cost, break-even, margin safety, and sensitivity analysis, scaling technique, Cobb–Douglas type of production function, and stochastic frontier were adopted to derive farm economics, allocative, and cost efficiency levels. With average productivity of 672 kg/ha, lentil farmers in the study area were earning about 41% profit as of gross return with a profitability index of 0.78. About 45% margin of safety and estimates of benefit–cost ratio above one on all sensitivity measures is indicative of low risk and robust enterprise. Resources allocated in lentil production were found inefficient, and to achieve maximum return, expenses on land preparation, seed, nutrient, and plant protection cum irrigation should be increased by 27.6%, 80%, 33.1%, and 97%, respectively. Similarly, expenses on labor and harvesting activities need to be decreased by 30.1% and 23.6%. Labor cost and seed cost were the most important variables, and a 1% increase would surge the total production costs by 0.42% and 0.19%, respectively. The cost efficiency was estimated as 1.137 mean value, meaning that over 13.7% of the costs in lentil farms is wasted while comparing best-practiced farm. Only about 48% of farms is fairly efficient at efficiency levels 1.0 to 1.09, but the majority is inefficient, which needs to minimize the waste of resources. Although suffering from climatic risks and production-related problems, lentil enterprise is profitable, less risky, less sensitive, and fairly to inefficient in resource use. Wise attention is need on the part of farm management and resource utilization. Farmers are suggested to maintain farm size around 0.5 ha or below 1 ha, use only improved varietal seed, cut labor expenses with the use of machinery, and perform adequate tillage during sowing followed by effective disease management practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legume Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.217\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legume Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legume Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究基于随机抽取的 473 位小扁豆种植农户的原始数据,分析了尼泊尔小扁豆农场的生产率、盈利能力、效率和敏感性。研究采用了效益-成本、盈亏平衡、安全边际和敏感性分析、缩放技术、柯布-道格拉斯生产函数类型和随机前沿等方法,以得出农场经济、分配和成本效率水平。研究地区的扁豆农户平均生产率为 672 公斤/公顷,毛收益率约为 41%,利润率指数为 0.78。安全系数约为 45%,所有敏感性指标的效益成本比均高于 1,表明企业风险低且稳健。小扁豆生产中的资源配置效率较低,为获得最大收益,土地整理、种子、养分、植保和灌溉费用应分别增加 27.6%、80%、33.1% 和 97%。同样,劳动力和收割活动的支出也需要减少 30.1%和 23.6%。劳动力成本和种子成本是最重要的变量,每增加 1%,总生产成本将分别增加 0.42% 和 0.19%。成本效率的平均值为 1.137,这意味着与最佳实践农场相比,扁豆农场有超过 13.7% 的成本被浪费了。只有约 48% 的农场效率在 1.0 至 1.09 之间,效率较高,但大多数农场效率较低,需要尽量减少资源浪费。虽然受到气候风险和生产相关问题的影响,但小扁豆企业有利可图、风险较小、敏感度较低,资源利用效率相当低。需要对农场管理和资源利用给予足够重视。建议农民将农场面积保持在 0.5 公顷左右或 1 公顷以下,只使用改良品种的种子,通过使用机械减少劳动力支出,在播种时进行充分耕作,并采取有效的病害管理措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Lentil (Lens culinaris) Farms Productive, Profitable, and Efficient in Resource Allocation? A Cross-Sectional Study From Nepal

The study was based on primary data from 473 lentil farmers selected randomly to analyze productivity, profitability, efficiency, and sensitivity of lentil farms in Nepal. Methods like benefit–cost, break-even, margin safety, and sensitivity analysis, scaling technique, Cobb–Douglas type of production function, and stochastic frontier were adopted to derive farm economics, allocative, and cost efficiency levels. With average productivity of 672 kg/ha, lentil farmers in the study area were earning about 41% profit as of gross return with a profitability index of 0.78. About 45% margin of safety and estimates of benefit–cost ratio above one on all sensitivity measures is indicative of low risk and robust enterprise. Resources allocated in lentil production were found inefficient, and to achieve maximum return, expenses on land preparation, seed, nutrient, and plant protection cum irrigation should be increased by 27.6%, 80%, 33.1%, and 97%, respectively. Similarly, expenses on labor and harvesting activities need to be decreased by 30.1% and 23.6%. Labor cost and seed cost were the most important variables, and a 1% increase would surge the total production costs by 0.42% and 0.19%, respectively. The cost efficiency was estimated as 1.137 mean value, meaning that over 13.7% of the costs in lentil farms is wasted while comparing best-practiced farm. Only about 48% of farms is fairly efficient at efficiency levels 1.0 to 1.09, but the majority is inefficient, which needs to minimize the waste of resources. Although suffering from climatic risks and production-related problems, lentil enterprise is profitable, less risky, less sensitive, and fairly to inefficient in resource use. Wise attention is need on the part of farm management and resource utilization. Farmers are suggested to maintain farm size around 0.5 ha or below 1 ha, use only improved varietal seed, cut labor expenses with the use of machinery, and perform adequate tillage during sowing followed by effective disease management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legume Science
Legume Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cooking Time, Seed Darkening, and Iron and Zinc Concentrations of Selected Andean Genotypes of Common Bean The Potential Application of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) Protein in Plant-Based Food Analogs: A Review Growth, Yield and Grain Quality of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) and Weed Flora as Affected by Physical and Chemical Methods of Weed Control Unveiling Phenotypic and Environmental Dynamics: Exploring Genetic Stability and Adaptability of Faba Bean Cultivars in Norwegian Climates Genetic Analysis for Seed Yield and Yield-Related Traits in Tepary Bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) Under Drought-Stress and Non-stress Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1