帕金森病患者抗压能力的预测因素及其与症状进展的关系

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES NPJ Parkinson's Disease Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1038/s41531-024-00692-4
Anouk van der Heide, Lisanne J. Dommershuijsen, Lara M. C. Puhlmann, Raffael Kalisch, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Anne E. M. Speckens, Rick C. Helmich
{"title":"帕金森病患者抗压能力的预测因素及其与症状进展的关系","authors":"Anouk van der Heide, Lisanne J. Dommershuijsen, Lara M. C. Puhlmann, Raffael Kalisch, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Anne E. M. Speckens, Rick C. Helmich","doi":"10.1038/s41531-024-00692-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People with Parkinson’s disease (PD) are sensitive to effects of long-term stress, but might differ in stress resilience, i.e. the ability to maintain mental health despite adversity. It is unclear whether stress resilience in PD is predominantly determined by dopamine deficiency, psychosocial factors, or both. In PD animal models, chronic stressors accelerate disease progression, but evidence in humans is lacking. Our objectives were to (1) distinguish stressor-reactive from resilient PD patients, (2) identify resilience factors, and (3) compare symptom progression between stressor-reactive and resilient patients. We conducted a longitudinal survey in Personalized Parkinson Project participants (<i>N</i> = 350 PD). We used the COVID-19 pandemic as a model of a stressor, aligned in time for the entire cohort. COVID-19-related stressors, perceived stress, and PD symptoms were assessed at 11 timepoints (April-October 2020). Both pre-COVID and in-COVID clinical assessments were available. We quantified stressor-reactivity as the residual between actual and predicted perceived stress relative to COVID-19-related stressors, and modeled trajectories of stressor-reactivity across timepoints. We explored pre-COVID predictors of 6-month average stressor-reactivity, and tested whether stressor-reactivity was prospectively associated with one-year clinical progression rates. Latent class trajectory models distinguished patients with high (<i>N</i> = 123) or low (<i>N</i> = 227) stressor-reactivity. Pre-existing anxiety, rumination and non-motor symptom severity predicted high stressor-reactivity (risk factors), whereas quality of life, social support, positive appraisal style and cognitive abilities predicted low stressor-reactivity (resilience factors). PD-specific factors, e.g. disease duration, motor severity, and levodopa use, did not predict stressor-reactivity. The COVID-19 pandemic did not accelerate disease progression, but worsened depressive symptoms in stressor-reactive PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of stress resilience in Parkinson’s disease and associations with symptom progression\",\"authors\":\"Anouk van der Heide, Lisanne J. Dommershuijsen, Lara M. C. Puhlmann, Raffael Kalisch, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Anne E. M. Speckens, Rick C. Helmich\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41531-024-00692-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>People with Parkinson’s disease (PD) are sensitive to effects of long-term stress, but might differ in stress resilience, i.e. the ability to maintain mental health despite adversity. It is unclear whether stress resilience in PD is predominantly determined by dopamine deficiency, psychosocial factors, or both. In PD animal models, chronic stressors accelerate disease progression, but evidence in humans is lacking. Our objectives were to (1) distinguish stressor-reactive from resilient PD patients, (2) identify resilience factors, and (3) compare symptom progression between stressor-reactive and resilient patients. We conducted a longitudinal survey in Personalized Parkinson Project participants (<i>N</i> = 350 PD). We used the COVID-19 pandemic as a model of a stressor, aligned in time for the entire cohort. COVID-19-related stressors, perceived stress, and PD symptoms were assessed at 11 timepoints (April-October 2020). Both pre-COVID and in-COVID clinical assessments were available. We quantified stressor-reactivity as the residual between actual and predicted perceived stress relative to COVID-19-related stressors, and modeled trajectories of stressor-reactivity across timepoints. We explored pre-COVID predictors of 6-month average stressor-reactivity, and tested whether stressor-reactivity was prospectively associated with one-year clinical progression rates. Latent class trajectory models distinguished patients with high (<i>N</i> = 123) or low (<i>N</i> = 227) stressor-reactivity. Pre-existing anxiety, rumination and non-motor symptom severity predicted high stressor-reactivity (risk factors), whereas quality of life, social support, positive appraisal style and cognitive abilities predicted low stressor-reactivity (resilience factors). PD-specific factors, e.g. disease duration, motor severity, and levodopa use, did not predict stressor-reactivity. The COVID-19 pandemic did not accelerate disease progression, but worsened depressive symptoms in stressor-reactive PD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-024-00692-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-024-00692-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

帕金森病(PD)患者对长期压力的影响非常敏感,但在压力恢复能力(即在逆境中保持心理健康的能力)方面可能存在差异。目前还不清楚帕金森病患者的抗压能力主要是由多巴胺缺乏、社会心理因素还是两者共同决定的。在帕金森病动物模型中,慢性压力会加速疾病的进展,但在人类中却缺乏证据。我们的目标是:(1)区分对压力源反应敏感的帕金森病患者和具有恢复力的患者;(2)确定恢复力因素;(3)比较对压力源反应敏感的患者和具有恢复力的患者的症状进展。我们对个性化帕金森病项目参与者(N = 350 名帕金森病患者)进行了纵向调查。我们将 COVID-19 大流行作为压力源模型,并在时间上与整个队列保持一致。我们在 11 个时间点(2020 年 4 月至 10 月)对 COVID-19 相关压力源、感知压力和帕金森病症状进行了评估。我们提供了 COVID 前和 COVID 中的临床评估。我们将压力源反应量化为相对于 COVID-19 相关压力源的实际感知压力与预测压力之间的残差,并模拟了不同时间点的压力源反应轨迹。我们探讨了 COVID 前 6 个月平均应激反应的预测因素,并测试了应激反应是否与一年的临床进展率相关。潜类轨迹模型区分了压力反应性高(N = 123)或低(N = 227)的患者。预先存在的焦虑、反刍和非运动症状严重程度预示着高压力反应(风险因素),而生活质量、社会支持、积极评价风格和认知能力预示着低压力反应(恢复因素)。帕金森病的特定因素,如病程、运动严重程度和左旋多巴的使用,并不能预测压力反应。COVID-19大流行并没有加速疾病的进展,但却加重了对压力反应敏感的帕金森病患者的抑郁症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of stress resilience in Parkinson’s disease and associations with symptom progression

People with Parkinson’s disease (PD) are sensitive to effects of long-term stress, but might differ in stress resilience, i.e. the ability to maintain mental health despite adversity. It is unclear whether stress resilience in PD is predominantly determined by dopamine deficiency, psychosocial factors, or both. In PD animal models, chronic stressors accelerate disease progression, but evidence in humans is lacking. Our objectives were to (1) distinguish stressor-reactive from resilient PD patients, (2) identify resilience factors, and (3) compare symptom progression between stressor-reactive and resilient patients. We conducted a longitudinal survey in Personalized Parkinson Project participants (N = 350 PD). We used the COVID-19 pandemic as a model of a stressor, aligned in time for the entire cohort. COVID-19-related stressors, perceived stress, and PD symptoms were assessed at 11 timepoints (April-October 2020). Both pre-COVID and in-COVID clinical assessments were available. We quantified stressor-reactivity as the residual between actual and predicted perceived stress relative to COVID-19-related stressors, and modeled trajectories of stressor-reactivity across timepoints. We explored pre-COVID predictors of 6-month average stressor-reactivity, and tested whether stressor-reactivity was prospectively associated with one-year clinical progression rates. Latent class trajectory models distinguished patients with high (N = 123) or low (N = 227) stressor-reactivity. Pre-existing anxiety, rumination and non-motor symptom severity predicted high stressor-reactivity (risk factors), whereas quality of life, social support, positive appraisal style and cognitive abilities predicted low stressor-reactivity (resilience factors). PD-specific factors, e.g. disease duration, motor severity, and levodopa use, did not predict stressor-reactivity. The COVID-19 pandemic did not accelerate disease progression, but worsened depressive symptoms in stressor-reactive PD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Parkinson's Disease
NPJ Parkinson's Disease Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
156
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial direct current stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of motor and cognitive effects The p.Gly2019Ser is a common LRRK2 pathogenic variant among Egyptians with familial and sporadic Parkinson's disease. Systemic inflammation accelerates neurodegeneration in a rat model of Parkinson's disease overexpressing human alpha synuclein. The effect of pallidal stimulation on sleep outcomes and related brain connectometries in Parkinson’s disease Subthalamic stimulation causally modulates human voluntary decision-making to stay or go.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1