急诊医学实习生的心理安全和感知到的组织支持

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10964
Margaret Goodrich MD, Kerry McCabe MD, Jesse Basford MD, Kimberly Bambach MD, Aaron Kraut MD, Jeffrey N. Love MD, MHPE, MSc
{"title":"急诊医学实习生的心理安全和感知到的组织支持","authors":"Margaret Goodrich MD,&nbsp;Kerry McCabe MD,&nbsp;Jesse Basford MD,&nbsp;Kimberly Bambach MD,&nbsp;Aaron Kraut MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Love MD, MHPE, MSc","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a key focus of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. It impacts knowledge acquisition and professional development. A previous single-center study evaluated the psychological safety and perceived organizational support of the CLE across different specialties. Building on this work, we explored and evaluated psychological safety and perceived organizational support across multiple heterogeneous emergency medicine (EM) residencies to identify trends and factors affecting perceptions of the CLE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using the Psychological Safety Scale (PSS) and Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS), residents from seven U.S. EM residencies were surveyed using REDCap software from September through November 2021, with 300 potential respondents. As an adjunct to these surveys, three open-ended questions were included regarding features of their learning environments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 137 out of 300 residents completed the survey. The overall response rate was 45.7%. There was a variable response rate across programs (26.0%–96.7%). Pooled results demonstrate an overall positive perception of CLEs, based on positive mean responses (i.e., “Members of my department are able to bring up problems and tough issue” had a mean of 4.2 on a 5-point Likert scale). Open responses identified teaching, collegiality, and support from program leadership as supportive features of the CLE. Confrontational interdisciplinary communication, a sense of being devalued, and off-service rotations were identified as threats or areas for improvement to the CLE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PSS and SPOS scores were generally positive in this multi-institution study, consistent with the prior single-institution study indicating that EM is often considered psychologically safe and supportive. EM training programs can consider using the PSS/SPOS to audit their own programs to identify areas for improvement and foster supportive features already in place.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological safety and perceived organizational support in emergency medicine residencies\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Goodrich MD,&nbsp;Kerry McCabe MD,&nbsp;Jesse Basford MD,&nbsp;Kimberly Bambach MD,&nbsp;Aaron Kraut MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Love MD, MHPE, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a key focus of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. It impacts knowledge acquisition and professional development. A previous single-center study evaluated the psychological safety and perceived organizational support of the CLE across different specialties. Building on this work, we explored and evaluated psychological safety and perceived organizational support across multiple heterogeneous emergency medicine (EM) residencies to identify trends and factors affecting perceptions of the CLE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using the Psychological Safety Scale (PSS) and Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS), residents from seven U.S. EM residencies were surveyed using REDCap software from September through November 2021, with 300 potential respondents. As an adjunct to these surveys, three open-ended questions were included regarding features of their learning environments.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 137 out of 300 residents completed the survey. The overall response rate was 45.7%. There was a variable response rate across programs (26.0%–96.7%). Pooled results demonstrate an overall positive perception of CLEs, based on positive mean responses (i.e., “Members of my department are able to bring up problems and tough issue” had a mean of 4.2 on a 5-point Likert scale). Open responses identified teaching, collegiality, and support from program leadership as supportive features of the CLE. Confrontational interdisciplinary communication, a sense of being devalued, and off-service rotations were identified as threats or areas for improvement to the CLE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>PSS and SPOS scores were generally positive in this multi-institution study, consistent with the prior single-institution study indicating that EM is often considered psychologically safe and supportive. EM training programs can consider using the PSS/SPOS to audit their own programs to identify areas for improvement and foster supportive features already in place.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 临床学习环境(CLE)是毕业后医学教育认证委员会(Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education)关注的重点。它影响着知识获取和专业发展。之前的一项单中心研究评估了不同专科临床学习环境的心理安全性和组织支持感知。在此基础上,我们对多个不同的急诊医学(EM)住院医师进行了心理安全和组织支持感知的探索和评估,以确定影响CLE感知的趋势和因素。 方法 使用心理安全量表 (PSS) 和感知组织支持调查 (SPOS),从 2021 年 9 月到 11 月使用 REDCap 软件对来自美国 7 家急诊医学住院医师培训机构的 300 名潜在受访者进行了调查。作为这些调查的补充,还包括三个有关学习环境特点的开放式问题。 结果 300 名住院医师中共有 137 人完成了调查。总回复率为 45.7%。不同项目的回复率各不相同(26.0%-96.7%)。汇总结果表明,根据积极的平均回答(即 "我所在科室的成员能够提出问题和棘手的问题",在 5 点李克特量表中的平均值为 4.2),住院医师对社区学习中心的总体看法是积极的。开放式回答认为,教学、同事关系和项目领导的支持是 CLE 的支持性特征。对抗性的跨学科交流、被贬低的感觉和脱产轮转被认为是对 CLE 的威胁或需要改进的地方。 结论 在这项多机构研究中,PSS和SPOS评分总体上是积极的,这与之前的单机构研究一致,表明电磁学通常被认为是心理安全和支持性的。电磁培训计划可以考虑使用PSS/SPOS来审核自己的计划,以确定需要改进的地方,并促进已经到位的支持性特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychological safety and perceived organizational support in emergency medicine residencies

Background

The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a key focus of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. It impacts knowledge acquisition and professional development. A previous single-center study evaluated the psychological safety and perceived organizational support of the CLE across different specialties. Building on this work, we explored and evaluated psychological safety and perceived organizational support across multiple heterogeneous emergency medicine (EM) residencies to identify trends and factors affecting perceptions of the CLE.

Methods

Using the Psychological Safety Scale (PSS) and Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS), residents from seven U.S. EM residencies were surveyed using REDCap software from September through November 2021, with 300 potential respondents. As an adjunct to these surveys, three open-ended questions were included regarding features of their learning environments.

Results

A total of 137 out of 300 residents completed the survey. The overall response rate was 45.7%. There was a variable response rate across programs (26.0%–96.7%). Pooled results demonstrate an overall positive perception of CLEs, based on positive mean responses (i.e., “Members of my department are able to bring up problems and tough issue” had a mean of 4.2 on a 5-point Likert scale). Open responses identified teaching, collegiality, and support from program leadership as supportive features of the CLE. Confrontational interdisciplinary communication, a sense of being devalued, and off-service rotations were identified as threats or areas for improvement to the CLE.

Conclusions

PSS and SPOS scores were generally positive in this multi-institution study, consistent with the prior single-institution study indicating that EM is often considered psychologically safe and supportive. EM training programs can consider using the PSS/SPOS to audit their own programs to identify areas for improvement and foster supportive features already in place.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
AI passed the test, but can it make the rounds? Effects of opening a vertical care area on emergency medicine resident clinical experience. Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients Use of in situ simulation to improve team performance and utilization of a rapid sequence intubation checklist Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1