与使用高警戒药物有关的药物相关不良事件的发生率:随机对照试验的系统回顾

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100435
Michelle Santos Menezes , Grace Anne Azevedo Doria , Fernanda Valença-Feitosa , Sylmara Nayara Pereira , Carina Carvalho Silvestre , Alfredo Dias de Oliveira Filho , Iza Maria Fraga Lobo , Lucindo José Quintans-Júnior
{"title":"与使用高警戒药物有关的药物相关不良事件的发生率:随机对照试验的系统回顾","authors":"Michelle Santos Menezes ,&nbsp;Grace Anne Azevedo Doria ,&nbsp;Fernanda Valença-Feitosa ,&nbsp;Sylmara Nayara Pereira ,&nbsp;Carina Carvalho Silvestre ,&nbsp;Alfredo Dias de Oliveira Filho ,&nbsp;Iza Maria Fraga Lobo ,&nbsp;Lucindo José Quintans-Júnior","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>High-alert medication (HAM) is more predictable to cause significant harm to the patient, even when used as intended. The damage related to the HAM lead not only suffering to the patient, but also raise the additional costs associated with care.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Evaluate the incidence of drug-related adverse events related to the use of high-alert medications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>It was conducted an active search for information through COCHRANE databases, LILACS, SciELO, SCOPUS, PubMed/MEDLINE and WEB OF SCIENCE. The search strategy included the following terms: “Patient safety”, “Medication errors” and “Hospital” and “High Alert Medications” or “Dangerous Drugs” in different combinations. Then two reviewers independently conducted a preliminary evaluation of relevant titles, abstracts and finally full-text. Studies quality was evaluated according to PRISMA declaration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The systematic review evaluated seven articles, which showed that only 11 HAM identified in the literature could have serious events. The most frequently cited were warfarin (22.2%) which progressed from deep vein thrombosis to gangrene, suggesting lower initial doses, followed by cyclophosphamide (22.2%) and cyclosporine (22.2%) which presented invasive fungal infection and death. In addition to these, morphine was compared with its active metabolite (M6G), with M6G causing fewer serious clinical events related to nausea and vomiting, reducing the need for concomitant use of antiemetics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The most reported drug classes in the articles included that were related to incidence of drug-related adverse events in use of high-alert medications: morphine, M6G-glucuronide, haloperidol, promethazine, ivabradine, digoxin, warfarin, ximelagatran, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, and ATG. The formulate protocols for the use of these medications, with importance placed on evaluating, among the classes, the medication that causes the least harm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000301/pdfft?md5=fc440abcbbf2b03a18d12a4bc08837a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000301-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of drug-related adverse events related to the use of high-alert drugs: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Santos Menezes ,&nbsp;Grace Anne Azevedo Doria ,&nbsp;Fernanda Valença-Feitosa ,&nbsp;Sylmara Nayara Pereira ,&nbsp;Carina Carvalho Silvestre ,&nbsp;Alfredo Dias de Oliveira Filho ,&nbsp;Iza Maria Fraga Lobo ,&nbsp;Lucindo José Quintans-Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>High-alert medication (HAM) is more predictable to cause significant harm to the patient, even when used as intended. The damage related to the HAM lead not only suffering to the patient, but also raise the additional costs associated with care.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Evaluate the incidence of drug-related adverse events related to the use of high-alert medications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>It was conducted an active search for information through COCHRANE databases, LILACS, SciELO, SCOPUS, PubMed/MEDLINE and WEB OF SCIENCE. The search strategy included the following terms: “Patient safety”, “Medication errors” and “Hospital” and “High Alert Medications” or “Dangerous Drugs” in different combinations. Then two reviewers independently conducted a preliminary evaluation of relevant titles, abstracts and finally full-text. Studies quality was evaluated according to PRISMA declaration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The systematic review evaluated seven articles, which showed that only 11 HAM identified in the literature could have serious events. The most frequently cited were warfarin (22.2%) which progressed from deep vein thrombosis to gangrene, suggesting lower initial doses, followed by cyclophosphamide (22.2%) and cyclosporine (22.2%) which presented invasive fungal infection and death. In addition to these, morphine was compared with its active metabolite (M6G), with M6G causing fewer serious clinical events related to nausea and vomiting, reducing the need for concomitant use of antiemetics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The most reported drug classes in the articles included that were related to incidence of drug-related adverse events in use of high-alert medications: morphine, M6G-glucuronide, haloperidol, promethazine, ivabradine, digoxin, warfarin, ximelagatran, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, and ATG. The formulate protocols for the use of these medications, with importance placed on evaluating, among the classes, the medication that causes the least harm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000301/pdfft?md5=fc440abcbbf2b03a18d12a4bc08837a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000301-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景高警戒性药物(HAM)更容易对患者造成重大伤害,即使是在按规定使用的情况下。方法通过 COCHRANE 数据库、LILACS、SciELO、SCOPUS、PubMed/MEDLINE 和 WEB OF SCIENCE 进行主动搜索。搜索策略包括以下术语:"患者安全"、"用药错误"、"医院"、"高度警戒药物 "或 "危险药物 "等不同组合。然后由两名审稿人独立对相关标题、摘要和全文进行初步评估。结果该系统性综述评估了 7 篇文章,结果表明文献中仅有 11 种 HAM 可能发生严重事件。最常引用的是华法林(22.2%),它从深静脉血栓发展为坏疽,这表明初始剂量较低;其次是环磷酰胺(22.2%)和环孢素(22.2%),它们出现了侵袭性真菌感染和死亡。除此之外,还将吗啡与其活性代谢物(M6G)进行了比较,M6G引起的恶心和呕吐等严重临床事件较少,从而减少了同时使用止吐药的需要。结论 在收录的文章中,报道最多的与使用高警戒药物时药物相关不良事件发生率有关的药物类别是:吗啡、M6G-葡萄糖醛酸、氟哌啶醇、异丙嗪、依维布雷定、地高辛、华法林、西美拉格伦、环磷酰胺、环孢素和ATG。制定这些药物的使用规程,重点是在各类药物中评估伤害最小的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence of drug-related adverse events related to the use of high-alert drugs: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Background

High-alert medication (HAM) is more predictable to cause significant harm to the patient, even when used as intended. The damage related to the HAM lead not only suffering to the patient, but also raise the additional costs associated with care.

Objective

Evaluate the incidence of drug-related adverse events related to the use of high-alert medications.

Methods

It was conducted an active search for information through COCHRANE databases, LILACS, SciELO, SCOPUS, PubMed/MEDLINE and WEB OF SCIENCE. The search strategy included the following terms: “Patient safety”, “Medication errors” and “Hospital” and “High Alert Medications” or “Dangerous Drugs” in different combinations. Then two reviewers independently conducted a preliminary evaluation of relevant titles, abstracts and finally full-text. Studies quality was evaluated according to PRISMA declaration.

Results

The systematic review evaluated seven articles, which showed that only 11 HAM identified in the literature could have serious events. The most frequently cited were warfarin (22.2%) which progressed from deep vein thrombosis to gangrene, suggesting lower initial doses, followed by cyclophosphamide (22.2%) and cyclosporine (22.2%) which presented invasive fungal infection and death. In addition to these, morphine was compared with its active metabolite (M6G), with M6G causing fewer serious clinical events related to nausea and vomiting, reducing the need for concomitant use of antiemetics.

Conclusions

The most reported drug classes in the articles included that were related to incidence of drug-related adverse events in use of high-alert medications: morphine, M6G-glucuronide, haloperidol, promethazine, ivabradine, digoxin, warfarin, ximelagatran, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, and ATG. The formulate protocols for the use of these medications, with importance placed on evaluating, among the classes, the medication that causes the least harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics: A single center cross-sectional study Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand Comparing nursing medication rounds before and after implementation of automated dispensing cabinets: A time and motion study Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the general medication adherence scale (GMAS) in patients with high blood pressure A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1