如何以及何时检测土壤碳饱和度的六项权利

IF 5.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.5194/soil-10-275-2024
Johan Six, Sebastian Doetterl, Moritz Laub, Claude R. Müller, Marijn Van de Broek
{"title":"如何以及何时检测土壤碳饱和度的六项权利","authors":"Johan Six, Sebastian Doetterl, Moritz Laub, Claude R. Müller, Marijn Van de Broek","doi":"10.5194/soil-10-275-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The concept of soil organic carbon (SOC) saturation emerged a bit more than 2 decades ago as our mechanistic understanding of SOC stabilization increased. Recently, the further testing of the concept across a wide range of soil types and environments has led some people to challenge the fundamentals of soil C saturation. Here, we argue that, to test this concept, one should pay attention to six fundamental principles or “rights” (R's): the right measures, the right units, the right dispersive energy and application, the right soil type, the right clay type, and the right saturation level. Once we take care of those six rights across studies, we find a maximum of C stabilized by minerals and estimate based on current data available that this maximum stabilization is around 82 ± 4 g C kg−1 silt + clay for 2 : 1-clay-dominated soils while most likely being only around 46 ± 4 g C kg−1 silt + clay for 1 : 1-clay-dominated soils. These estimates can be further improved using more data, especially for different clay types across varying environmental conditions. However, the bigger challenge is a matter of which C sequestration strategies to implement and how to implement them in order to effectively reach this 82/46 g C kg−1 silt + clay in soils across the globe.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The six rights of how and when to test for soil C saturation\",\"authors\":\"Johan Six, Sebastian Doetterl, Moritz Laub, Claude R. Müller, Marijn Van de Broek\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/soil-10-275-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The concept of soil organic carbon (SOC) saturation emerged a bit more than 2 decades ago as our mechanistic understanding of SOC stabilization increased. Recently, the further testing of the concept across a wide range of soil types and environments has led some people to challenge the fundamentals of soil C saturation. Here, we argue that, to test this concept, one should pay attention to six fundamental principles or “rights” (R's): the right measures, the right units, the right dispersive energy and application, the right soil type, the right clay type, and the right saturation level. Once we take care of those six rights across studies, we find a maximum of C stabilized by minerals and estimate based on current data available that this maximum stabilization is around 82 ± 4 g C kg−1 silt + clay for 2 : 1-clay-dominated soils while most likely being only around 46 ± 4 g C kg−1 silt + clay for 1 : 1-clay-dominated soils. These estimates can be further improved using more data, especially for different clay types across varying environmental conditions. However, the bigger challenge is a matter of which C sequestration strategies to implement and how to implement them in order to effectively reach this 82/46 g C kg−1 silt + clay in soils across the globe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-275-2024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-275-2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要。二十多年前,随着我们对土壤有机碳(SOC)稳定机理认识的加深,土壤有机碳(SOC)饱和度的概念应运而生。最近,随着这一概念在多种土壤类型和环境中的进一步验证,一些人对土壤有机碳饱和度的基本原理提出了质疑。在此,我们认为,要检验这一概念,应该注意六项基本原则或 "权利"(R):正确的措施、正确的单位、正确的分散能量和应用、正确的土壤类型、正确的粘土类型以及正确的饱和度。一旦我们在各项研究中都考虑到了这六项权利,我们就会发现矿物稳定的碳的最大值,并根据现有数据估计,对于 2 :而对于 1 :而对于 1 : 1-粘土为主的土壤,则很可能只有约 46 ± 4 g C kg-1 淤泥 + 粘土。利用更多数据,特别是不同环境条件下不同粘土类型的数据,可以进一步改进这些估计值。然而,更大的挑战在于要实施哪些固碳策略以及如何实施这些策略,以便在全球土壤中有效地达到 82/46 克 C kg-1 淤泥+粘土的固碳水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The six rights of how and when to test for soil C saturation
Abstract. The concept of soil organic carbon (SOC) saturation emerged a bit more than 2 decades ago as our mechanistic understanding of SOC stabilization increased. Recently, the further testing of the concept across a wide range of soil types and environments has led some people to challenge the fundamentals of soil C saturation. Here, we argue that, to test this concept, one should pay attention to six fundamental principles or “rights” (R's): the right measures, the right units, the right dispersive energy and application, the right soil type, the right clay type, and the right saturation level. Once we take care of those six rights across studies, we find a maximum of C stabilized by minerals and estimate based on current data available that this maximum stabilization is around 82 ± 4 g C kg−1 silt + clay for 2 : 1-clay-dominated soils while most likely being only around 46 ± 4 g C kg−1 silt + clay for 1 : 1-clay-dominated soils. These estimates can be further improved using more data, especially for different clay types across varying environmental conditions. However, the bigger challenge is a matter of which C sequestration strategies to implement and how to implement them in order to effectively reach this 82/46 g C kg−1 silt + clay in soils across the globe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil
Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences. SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).
期刊最新文献
Cr(VI) reduction, electricity production, and microbial resistance variation in paddy soil under microbial fuel cell operation Insights into the prediction uncertainty of machine-learning-based digital soil mapping through a local attribution approach Cultivation reduces quantities of mineral-organic associations in the form of amorphous coprecipitates Benchmarking soil multifunctionality Depth extrapolation of field-scale soil moisture time series derived with cosmic-ray neutron sensing (CRNS) using the soil moisture analytical relationship (SMAR) model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1