Bryan A. Farford , Brian J. Eglinger , Lindsey Kane , James N. Gilbert , Colleen T. Ball
{"title":"糖尿病设计的送餐服务对糖尿病患者血红蛋白 A1c 和生活质量变化的影响","authors":"Bryan A. Farford , Brian J. Eglinger , Lindsey Kane , James N. Gilbert , Colleen T. Ball","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over 34 million Americans have diabetes, and nutrition therapy is essential in self-management.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of meals designed for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) through a meal delivery program. The primary outcome was a 3-month change in hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> (HbA<sub>1c</sub>). Secondary outcomes included a 3-month change in weight, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides. Furthermore, the study aimed to evaluate the impact of the meal delivery program on the participants' quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this randomized crossover clinical trial, patients were allocated in a 1:1 fashion to treatment sequence AB or treatment sequence BA. In Phase 1, participants allocated to sequence AB received 10 meals per week for 3 months, followed by a 3-month washout period and a 3-month standard intervention period with no meals. Participants allocated to sequence BA received 3 months of standard intervention with no meals followed by a 3-month washout period and a 3-month period with 10 meals per week. A quality-of-life survey was obtained during weeks 0, 12, 24, and 36.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean 3-month change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> (primary outcome) was nearly a half point lower with meal delivery (−0.44% [95% CI: −0.85%, −0.03%]; <em>P</em> = 0.037). The estimated mean 3-month change in quality of life was approximately 2 points lower (better) with meal delivery (−2.2 points [95% CI: −4.2, −0.3]; <em>P</em> = .027). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes with meal delivery (all <em>P</em> ≥ 0.15).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A meal delivery system for patients with T2D improves glycemic control and quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"18 4","pages":"Article 103004"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a diabetes-designed meal delivery service on changes in hemoglobin A1c and quality of life in patients with diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Bryan A. Farford , Brian J. Eglinger , Lindsey Kane , James N. Gilbert , Colleen T. Ball\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over 34 million Americans have diabetes, and nutrition therapy is essential in self-management.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of meals designed for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) through a meal delivery program. The primary outcome was a 3-month change in hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> (HbA<sub>1c</sub>). Secondary outcomes included a 3-month change in weight, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides. Furthermore, the study aimed to evaluate the impact of the meal delivery program on the participants' quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this randomized crossover clinical trial, patients were allocated in a 1:1 fashion to treatment sequence AB or treatment sequence BA. In Phase 1, participants allocated to sequence AB received 10 meals per week for 3 months, followed by a 3-month washout period and a 3-month standard intervention period with no meals. Participants allocated to sequence BA received 3 months of standard intervention with no meals followed by a 3-month washout period and a 3-month period with 10 meals per week. A quality-of-life survey was obtained during weeks 0, 12, 24, and 36.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean 3-month change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> (primary outcome) was nearly a half point lower with meal delivery (−0.44% [95% CI: −0.85%, −0.03%]; <em>P</em> = 0.037). The estimated mean 3-month change in quality of life was approximately 2 points lower (better) with meal delivery (−2.2 points [95% CI: −4.2, −0.3]; <em>P</em> = .027). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes with meal delivery (all <em>P</em> ≥ 0.15).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A meal delivery system for patients with T2D improves glycemic control and quality of life.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 103004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124000651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124000651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of a diabetes-designed meal delivery service on changes in hemoglobin A1c and quality of life in patients with diabetes
Background
Over 34 million Americans have diabetes, and nutrition therapy is essential in self-management.
Aims
The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of meals designed for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) through a meal delivery program. The primary outcome was a 3-month change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Secondary outcomes included a 3-month change in weight, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides. Furthermore, the study aimed to evaluate the impact of the meal delivery program on the participants' quality of life.
Methods
In this randomized crossover clinical trial, patients were allocated in a 1:1 fashion to treatment sequence AB or treatment sequence BA. In Phase 1, participants allocated to sequence AB received 10 meals per week for 3 months, followed by a 3-month washout period and a 3-month standard intervention period with no meals. Participants allocated to sequence BA received 3 months of standard intervention with no meals followed by a 3-month washout period and a 3-month period with 10 meals per week. A quality-of-life survey was obtained during weeks 0, 12, 24, and 36.
Results
The mean 3-month change in HbA1c (primary outcome) was nearly a half point lower with meal delivery (−0.44% [95% CI: −0.85%, −0.03%]; P = 0.037). The estimated mean 3-month change in quality of life was approximately 2 points lower (better) with meal delivery (−2.2 points [95% CI: −4.2, −0.3]; P = .027). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes with meal delivery (all P ≥ 0.15).
Conclusions
A meal delivery system for patients with T2D improves glycemic control and quality of life.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care.
Types of Publications:
Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.