肺动脉导管在降低急性心力衰竭心源性休克死亡率方面的疗效:系统性综述

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart & Lung Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.02.012
Brianna Wagaman ACNPC-AG, RN, BSN, CCRN
{"title":"肺动脉导管在降低急性心力衰竭心源性休克死亡率方面的疗效:系统性综述","authors":"Brianna Wagaman ACNPC-AG, RN, BSN, CCRN","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cardiogenic shock (CS), a complex and life-threatening medical condition, has an astounding hospital mortality rate spanning from 40 % to 59 %. Frequently, CS requires the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) for management.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This literature review aims to investigate the relationship between PAC utilization in CS patients and in-hospital 30-day mortality rates compared to noninvasive vital sign monitoring alone.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An integrative literature search was conducted from January 1, 2003, until August 1, 2023. The review focused on patients with acute decompensated heart failure CS. It compared PAC and non-PAC hemodynamic monitoring with 30-day mortality outcomes. Five articles met the inclusion criteria and underwent quality assessment using CONSORT, STROBE, and STARD guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five articles totaled 332,794 patients. Patients with a PAC showed lower 30-day in-hospital mortality rates (22.2 % to 55 %) than patients without a PAC (29.8–78 %). One study, however, indicated that PAC use did not significantly affect mortality rates (<em>p</em> = 0.66). Notably, the lowest mortality rates (25 %) were linked to complete hemodynamic profiling with a PAC.</p><p>The mortality rates showed greater significance when PAC initiation occurred early, resulting in a further reduction of the mortality rate to 17.3 %. Conversely, mortality rates increased to 27.7 % with delayed PAC initiation, 40 % with incomplete hemodynamic profiling, and 35 % with no PAC use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PAC utilization reduces in-hospital mortality for the CS patient population, as suggested by the analyzed studies. Further research via randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with standardized treatment protocols and adequate follow-up are required to validate the findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of pulmonary artery catheters in reducing mortality in acute heart failure cardiogenic shock: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Brianna Wagaman ACNPC-AG, RN, BSN, CCRN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.02.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cardiogenic shock (CS), a complex and life-threatening medical condition, has an astounding hospital mortality rate spanning from 40 % to 59 %. Frequently, CS requires the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) for management.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This literature review aims to investigate the relationship between PAC utilization in CS patients and in-hospital 30-day mortality rates compared to noninvasive vital sign monitoring alone.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An integrative literature search was conducted from January 1, 2003, until August 1, 2023. The review focused on patients with acute decompensated heart failure CS. It compared PAC and non-PAC hemodynamic monitoring with 30-day mortality outcomes. Five articles met the inclusion criteria and underwent quality assessment using CONSORT, STROBE, and STARD guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five articles totaled 332,794 patients. Patients with a PAC showed lower 30-day in-hospital mortality rates (22.2 % to 55 %) than patients without a PAC (29.8–78 %). One study, however, indicated that PAC use did not significantly affect mortality rates (<em>p</em> = 0.66). Notably, the lowest mortality rates (25 %) were linked to complete hemodynamic profiling with a PAC.</p><p>The mortality rates showed greater significance when PAC initiation occurred early, resulting in a further reduction of the mortality rate to 17.3 %. Conversely, mortality rates increased to 27.7 % with delayed PAC initiation, 40 % with incomplete hemodynamic profiling, and 35 % with no PAC use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PAC utilization reduces in-hospital mortality for the CS patient population, as suggested by the analyzed studies. Further research via randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with standardized treatment protocols and adequate follow-up are required to validate the findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart & Lung\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart & Lung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324000335\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324000335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景心源性休克(CS)是一种复杂且危及生命的病症,其住院死亡率高达 40% 至 59%。本文献综述旨在研究与单纯的无创生命体征监测相比,CS 患者使用肺动脉导管(PAC)与住院 30 天死亡率之间的关系。方法对 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 1 日的文献进行了综合检索。综述的重点是急性失代偿性心力衰竭 CS 患者。该研究比较了 PAC 和非 PAC 血流动力学监测与 30 天死亡率的关系。五篇文章符合纳入标准,并根据 CONSORT、STROBE 和 STARD 指南进行了质量评估。与未使用 PAC 的患者(29.8%-78%)相比,使用 PAC 的患者 30 天院内死亡率较低(22.2%-55%)。不过,一项研究表明,使用 PAC 对死亡率的影响不大(p = 0.66)。值得注意的是,死亡率最低(25%)与使用 PAC 进行完整的血流动力学分析有关。当 PAC 启动较早时,死亡率显示出更大的意义,使死亡率进一步降至 17.3%。相反,延迟启动 PAC 的死亡率上升到 27.7%,血流动力学分析不完整的死亡率上升到 40%,未使用 PAC 的死亡率上升到 35%。要验证这些研究结果,还需要通过采用标准化治疗方案和充分随访的随机对照试验(RCT)进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of pulmonary artery catheters in reducing mortality in acute heart failure cardiogenic shock: A systematic review

Background

Cardiogenic shock (CS), a complex and life-threatening medical condition, has an astounding hospital mortality rate spanning from 40 % to 59 %. Frequently, CS requires the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) for management.

Objective

This literature review aims to investigate the relationship between PAC utilization in CS patients and in-hospital 30-day mortality rates compared to noninvasive vital sign monitoring alone.

Methods

An integrative literature search was conducted from January 1, 2003, until August 1, 2023. The review focused on patients with acute decompensated heart failure CS. It compared PAC and non-PAC hemodynamic monitoring with 30-day mortality outcomes. Five articles met the inclusion criteria and underwent quality assessment using CONSORT, STROBE, and STARD guidelines.

Results

Five articles totaled 332,794 patients. Patients with a PAC showed lower 30-day in-hospital mortality rates (22.2 % to 55 %) than patients without a PAC (29.8–78 %). One study, however, indicated that PAC use did not significantly affect mortality rates (p = 0.66). Notably, the lowest mortality rates (25 %) were linked to complete hemodynamic profiling with a PAC.

The mortality rates showed greater significance when PAC initiation occurred early, resulting in a further reduction of the mortality rate to 17.3 %. Conversely, mortality rates increased to 27.7 % with delayed PAC initiation, 40 % with incomplete hemodynamic profiling, and 35 % with no PAC use.

Conclusions

PAC utilization reduces in-hospital mortality for the CS patient population, as suggested by the analyzed studies. Further research via randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with standardized treatment protocols and adequate follow-up are required to validate the findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes following aortic valve replacement in bioprosthetic vs mechanical valves. Effects of intubation and hypoxemia on intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants during the first week: An observational study. Association between diet-derived antioxidants and asthma: Insights from the NHANES survey 2003-2018 and Mendelian randomization analysis. Effectiveness and safety of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis The effects of exercise-based prehabilitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1