利用肺泡模型研究呼吸道致敏物质的转录组特征

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Cell Biology and Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1007/s10565-024-09860-x
Matthew Gibb, James Y. Liu, Christie M. Sayes
{"title":"利用肺泡模型研究呼吸道致敏物质的转录组特征","authors":"Matthew Gibb, James Y. Liu, Christie M. Sayes","doi":"10.1007/s10565-024-09860-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental contaminants are ubiquitous in the air we breathe and can potentially cause adverse immunological outcomes such as respiratory sensitization, a type of immune-driven allergic response in the lungs. Wood dust, latex, pet dander, oils, fragrances, paints, and glues have all been implicated as possible respiratory sensitizers. With the increased incidence of exposure to chemical mixtures and the rapid production of novel materials, it is paramount that testing regimes accounting for sensitization are incorporated into development cycles. However, no validated assay exists that is universally accepted to measure a substance’s respiratory sensitizing potential. The lungs comprise various cell types and regions where sensitization can occur, with the gas-exchange interface being especially important due to implications for overall lung function. As such, an assay that can mimic the alveolar compartment and assess sensitization would be an important advance for inhalation toxicology. Some such models are under development, but in-depth transcriptomic analyses have yet to be reported. Understanding the transcriptome after sensitizer exposure would greatly advance hazard assessment and sustainability. We tested two known sensitizers (<i>i.e.,</i> isophorone diisocyanate and ethylenediamine) and two known non-sensitizers (<i>i.e.,</i> chlorobenzene and dimethylformamide). RNA sequencing was performed in our in vitro alveolar model, consisting of a 3D co-culture of epithelial, macrophage, and dendritic cells. Sensitizers were readily distinguishable from non-sensitizers by principal component analysis. However, few differentially regulated genes were common across all pair-wise comparisons (<i>i.e.,</i> upregulation of genes <i>SOX9</i>, <i>UACA</i>, <i>CCDC88A</i>, <i>FOSL1</i>, <i>KIF20B</i>). While the model utilized in this study can differentiate the sensitizers from the non-sensitizers tested, further studies will be required to robustly identify critical pathways inducing respiratory sensitization.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3><p>Graphical headlines/headlights</p><ul>\n<li>\n<p>Pollutants may trigger lung allergies, but no universal method measures respiratory sensitization potential.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>In vitro systems can detect respiratory sensitizers, aiding in anticipating and reducing the risks of new materials.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Sensitizers and non-sensitizers can be distinguished through transcriptome investigation.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The sensitizers tested induced cell differentiation and proliferation pathways while inhibiting immune defense and functionality.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n","PeriodicalId":9672,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biology and Toxicology","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The transcriptomic signature of respiratory sensitizers using an alveolar model\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Gibb, James Y. Liu, Christie M. Sayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10565-024-09860-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Environmental contaminants are ubiquitous in the air we breathe and can potentially cause adverse immunological outcomes such as respiratory sensitization, a type of immune-driven allergic response in the lungs. Wood dust, latex, pet dander, oils, fragrances, paints, and glues have all been implicated as possible respiratory sensitizers. With the increased incidence of exposure to chemical mixtures and the rapid production of novel materials, it is paramount that testing regimes accounting for sensitization are incorporated into development cycles. However, no validated assay exists that is universally accepted to measure a substance’s respiratory sensitizing potential. The lungs comprise various cell types and regions where sensitization can occur, with the gas-exchange interface being especially important due to implications for overall lung function. As such, an assay that can mimic the alveolar compartment and assess sensitization would be an important advance for inhalation toxicology. Some such models are under development, but in-depth transcriptomic analyses have yet to be reported. Understanding the transcriptome after sensitizer exposure would greatly advance hazard assessment and sustainability. We tested two known sensitizers (<i>i.e.,</i> isophorone diisocyanate and ethylenediamine) and two known non-sensitizers (<i>i.e.,</i> chlorobenzene and dimethylformamide). RNA sequencing was performed in our in vitro alveolar model, consisting of a 3D co-culture of epithelial, macrophage, and dendritic cells. Sensitizers were readily distinguishable from non-sensitizers by principal component analysis. However, few differentially regulated genes were common across all pair-wise comparisons (<i>i.e.,</i> upregulation of genes <i>SOX9</i>, <i>UACA</i>, <i>CCDC88A</i>, <i>FOSL1</i>, <i>KIF20B</i>). While the model utilized in this study can differentiate the sensitizers from the non-sensitizers tested, further studies will be required to robustly identify critical pathways inducing respiratory sensitization.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3><p>Graphical headlines/headlights</p><ul>\\n<li>\\n<p>Pollutants may trigger lung allergies, but no universal method measures respiratory sensitization potential.</p>\\n</li>\\n<li>\\n<p>In vitro systems can detect respiratory sensitizers, aiding in anticipating and reducing the risks of new materials.</p>\\n</li>\\n<li>\\n<p>Sensitizers and non-sensitizers can be distinguished through transcriptome investigation.</p>\\n</li>\\n<li>\\n<p>The sensitizers tested induced cell differentiation and proliferation pathways while inhibiting immune defense and functionality.</p>\\n</li>\\n</ul>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":9672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Biology and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Biology and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-024-09860-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biology and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-024-09860-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境污染物在我们呼吸的空气中无处不在,有可能导致不良的免疫结果,如呼吸道过敏,这是一种由免疫驱动的肺部过敏反应。木屑、乳胶、宠物皮屑、油类、香料、油漆和胶水都被认为是可能引起呼吸道过敏的物质。随着接触化学混合物的几率增加以及新型材料的快速生产,在开发周期中纳入致敏测试制度至关重要。然而,目前还没有普遍认可的有效检测方法来测量物质的呼吸道致敏潜能。肺部由各种细胞类型和可能发生致敏作用的区域组成,其中气体交换界面尤其重要,因为它会影响肺部的整体功能。因此,能够模拟肺泡区室并评估致敏性的检测方法将是吸入毒理学的一大进步。一些此类模型正在开发中,但深入的转录组分析尚未见报道。了解致敏剂暴露后的转录组将极大地促进危害评估和可持续发展。我们测试了两种已知的敏化剂(即异佛尔酮二异氰酸酯和乙二胺)和两种已知的非敏化剂(即氯苯和二甲基甲酰胺)。RNA 测序是在体外肺泡模型中进行的,该模型由上皮细胞、巨噬细胞和树突状细胞三维共培养而成。通过主成分分析,致敏者与非致敏者很容易区分开来。然而,在所有成对比较中,只有少数几个基因受到不同程度的调控(如基因 SOX9、UACA、CCDC88A、FOSL1 和 KIF20B 的上调)。虽然本研究中使用的模型可以区分所测试的致敏物质和非致敏物质,但还需要进一步的研究才能有力地确定诱导呼吸道致敏的关键途径。体外系统可以检测呼吸道致敏物质,有助于预测和降低新材料的风险。通过转录组调查可以区分致敏物质和非致敏物质。所测试的致敏物质可以诱导细胞分化和增殖途径,同时抑制免疫防御和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The transcriptomic signature of respiratory sensitizers using an alveolar model

Environmental contaminants are ubiquitous in the air we breathe and can potentially cause adverse immunological outcomes such as respiratory sensitization, a type of immune-driven allergic response in the lungs. Wood dust, latex, pet dander, oils, fragrances, paints, and glues have all been implicated as possible respiratory sensitizers. With the increased incidence of exposure to chemical mixtures and the rapid production of novel materials, it is paramount that testing regimes accounting for sensitization are incorporated into development cycles. However, no validated assay exists that is universally accepted to measure a substance’s respiratory sensitizing potential. The lungs comprise various cell types and regions where sensitization can occur, with the gas-exchange interface being especially important due to implications for overall lung function. As such, an assay that can mimic the alveolar compartment and assess sensitization would be an important advance for inhalation toxicology. Some such models are under development, but in-depth transcriptomic analyses have yet to be reported. Understanding the transcriptome after sensitizer exposure would greatly advance hazard assessment and sustainability. We tested two known sensitizers (i.e., isophorone diisocyanate and ethylenediamine) and two known non-sensitizers (i.e., chlorobenzene and dimethylformamide). RNA sequencing was performed in our in vitro alveolar model, consisting of a 3D co-culture of epithelial, macrophage, and dendritic cells. Sensitizers were readily distinguishable from non-sensitizers by principal component analysis. However, few differentially regulated genes were common across all pair-wise comparisons (i.e., upregulation of genes SOX9UACACCDC88AFOSL1KIF20B). While the model utilized in this study can differentiate the sensitizers from the non-sensitizers tested, further studies will be required to robustly identify critical pathways inducing respiratory sensitization.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical headlines/headlights

  • Pollutants may trigger lung allergies, but no universal method measures respiratory sensitization potential.

  • In vitro systems can detect respiratory sensitizers, aiding in anticipating and reducing the risks of new materials.

  • Sensitizers and non-sensitizers can be distinguished through transcriptome investigation.

  • The sensitizers tested induced cell differentiation and proliferation pathways while inhibiting immune defense and functionality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell Biology and Toxicology
Cell Biology and Toxicology 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cell Biology and Toxicology (CBT) is an international journal focused on clinical and translational research with an emphasis on molecular and cell biology, genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity, drug discovery and development, and molecular pharmacology and toxicology. CBT has a disease-specific scope prioritizing publications on gene and protein-based regulation, intracellular signaling pathway dysfunction, cell type-specific function, and systems in biomedicine in drug discovery and development. CBT publishes original articles with outstanding, innovative and significant findings, important reviews on recent research advances and issues of high current interest, opinion articles of leading edge science, and rapid communication or reports, on molecular mechanisms and therapies in diseases.
期刊最新文献
Protocatechuic acid relieves ferroptosis in hepatic lipotoxicity and steatosis via regulating NRF2 signaling pathway. CREB3 protein family: the promising therapeutic targets for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. ASPP2 deficiency attenuates lipid accumulation through the PPARγ pathway in alcoholic liver injury. Advancing gastric cancer treatment: nanotechnology innovations and future prospects. The pivotal role of ZNF384: driving the malignant behavior of serous ovarian cancer cells via the LIN28B/UBD axis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1