共振超声波测试可定量评估复杂形状铝硅镁叠加制造部件的微观孔隙率

IF 2.6 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1007/s10921-024-01064-x
Michail Skiadopoulos, Dominic J. Prato, Evan P. Bozek, Corey J. Dickman, Edward W. Reutzel, David J. Corbin, Parisa Shokouhi
{"title":"共振超声波测试可定量评估复杂形状铝硅镁叠加制造部件的微观孔隙率","authors":"Michail Skiadopoulos,&nbsp;Dominic J. Prato,&nbsp;Evan P. Bozek,&nbsp;Corey J. Dickman,&nbsp;Edward W. Reutzel,&nbsp;David J. Corbin,&nbsp;Parisa Shokouhi","doi":"10.1007/s10921-024-01064-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The utility of resonant ultrasonic testing for quality control of complex-shaped additively manufactured (AM) components in terms of porosity variations is investigated. A fully non-contact test setup is used to investigate differences in the volumetric porosity between AM AlSi10Mg samples. A set of 96 samples with programmatically induced pores varying in nominal total porosity between 0% and 2% is tested: one half of the samples are prismatic, and the other half have a complex internal Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) structure. In addition, a subset of the samples is scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (µ-CT). It is found that the resonance frequency corresponding to the 1st compressional mode can predict the total nominal porosity even in TPMS samples. From statistical analysis, the smallest detectable porosity difference is found to be 0.25% for the prismatic samples and 0.5% for the TPMS samples. The experimental results agree well with the predictions of finite element (FE) simulations and analytical models. However, X-ray µ-CT appears to underestimate the porosity, possibly due to its inability to resolve the small pores. Our findings suggest that resonant ultrasonic testing can quantitatively assess the total porosity of AM parts having complex geometries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resonant Ultrasonic Testing can Quantitatively Assess the Microscopic Porosity of Complex-Shaped Additively Manufactured AlSi10Mg Components\",\"authors\":\"Michail Skiadopoulos,&nbsp;Dominic J. Prato,&nbsp;Evan P. Bozek,&nbsp;Corey J. Dickman,&nbsp;Edward W. Reutzel,&nbsp;David J. Corbin,&nbsp;Parisa Shokouhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10921-024-01064-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The utility of resonant ultrasonic testing for quality control of complex-shaped additively manufactured (AM) components in terms of porosity variations is investigated. A fully non-contact test setup is used to investigate differences in the volumetric porosity between AM AlSi10Mg samples. A set of 96 samples with programmatically induced pores varying in nominal total porosity between 0% and 2% is tested: one half of the samples are prismatic, and the other half have a complex internal Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) structure. In addition, a subset of the samples is scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (µ-CT). It is found that the resonance frequency corresponding to the 1st compressional mode can predict the total nominal porosity even in TPMS samples. From statistical analysis, the smallest detectable porosity difference is found to be 0.25% for the prismatic samples and 0.5% for the TPMS samples. The experimental results agree well with the predictions of finite element (FE) simulations and analytical models. However, X-ray µ-CT appears to underestimate the porosity, possibly due to its inability to resolve the small pores. Our findings suggest that resonant ultrasonic testing can quantitatively assess the total porosity of AM parts having complex geometries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10921-024-01064-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10921-024-01064-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了共振超声波测试在复杂形状的快速成型(AM)部件的孔隙率变化质量控制方面的实用性。采用完全非接触式测试装置来研究 AM AlSi10Mg 样品之间体积孔隙率的差异。测试了一组 96 个样品,这些样品的标称总孔隙率在 0% 到 2% 之间,其中一半为棱柱形,另一半具有复杂的内部三周期最小表面 (TPMS) 结构。此外,还使用 X 射线微型计算机断层扫描(µ-CT)技术对部分样品进行了扫描。结果发现,即使在 TPMS 样品中,与第一压缩模式相对应的共振频率也能预测总标称孔隙率。通过统计分析发现,棱柱样品和 TPMS 样品可检测到的最小孔隙率差异分别为 0.25%和 0.5%。实验结果与有限元(FE)模拟和分析模型的预测结果十分吻合。不过,X 射线 µ-CT 似乎低估了孔隙率,这可能是由于它无法分辨小孔隙。我们的研究结果表明,共振超声波测试可以定量评估具有复杂几何形状的 AM 零件的总孔隙率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resonant Ultrasonic Testing can Quantitatively Assess the Microscopic Porosity of Complex-Shaped Additively Manufactured AlSi10Mg Components

The utility of resonant ultrasonic testing for quality control of complex-shaped additively manufactured (AM) components in terms of porosity variations is investigated. A fully non-contact test setup is used to investigate differences in the volumetric porosity between AM AlSi10Mg samples. A set of 96 samples with programmatically induced pores varying in nominal total porosity between 0% and 2% is tested: one half of the samples are prismatic, and the other half have a complex internal Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) structure. In addition, a subset of the samples is scanned using X-ray micro-computed tomography (µ-CT). It is found that the resonance frequency corresponding to the 1st compressional mode can predict the total nominal porosity even in TPMS samples. From statistical analysis, the smallest detectable porosity difference is found to be 0.25% for the prismatic samples and 0.5% for the TPMS samples. The experimental results agree well with the predictions of finite element (FE) simulations and analytical models. However, X-ray µ-CT appears to underestimate the porosity, possibly due to its inability to resolve the small pores. Our findings suggest that resonant ultrasonic testing can quantitatively assess the total porosity of AM parts having complex geometries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation provides a forum for the broad range of scientific and engineering activities involved in developing a quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) capability. This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers on the development of new equipment, analyses, and approaches to nondestructive measurements.
期刊最新文献
Electromagnetic Radiation Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of Cement-Mortar Under Impact Load Instance Segmentation XXL-CT Challenge of a Historic Airplane Publisher Correction: Intelligent Extraction of Surface Cracks on LNG Outer Tanks Based on Close-Range Image Point Clouds and Infrared Imagery Acoustic Emission Signal Feature Extraction for Bearing Faults Using ACF and GMOMEDA Modeling and Analysis of Ellipticity Dispersion Characteristics of Lamb Waves in Pre-stressed Plates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1