在城市学校大规模推广心理健康教师咨询模式的社区合作过程

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL School Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1007/s12310-024-09645-x
Jordan Albright, Julie Worley, Samantha Rushworth, Elise Cappella, Sophia Hwang, Shannon Testa, Biiftu Duresso, Natalie Dallard, Jayme Banks, Cherry Du, Gwendolyn M. Lawson, Courtney Benjamin Wolk
{"title":"在城市学校大规模推广心理健康教师咨询模式的社区合作过程","authors":"Jordan Albright, Julie Worley, Samantha Rushworth, Elise Cappella, Sophia Hwang, Shannon Testa, Biiftu Duresso, Natalie Dallard, Jayme Banks, Cherry Du, Gwendolyn M. Lawson, Courtney Benjamin Wolk","doi":"10.1007/s12310-024-09645-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bridging Mental Health and Education (BRIDGE) is an evidence-based model for embedding teacher consultation and coaching activities into school-based mental health clinicians’ regular workflow. Here we describe the process of adapting BRIDGE in partnership with a large urban school district and a local managed care organization during a large-scale implementation effort. We also report the feasibility and perceived effectiveness of the adapted training and consultation model as reported by clinicians in one school year. Over 93% of trained clinicians (<i>n</i> = 75) initiated coaching sessions with assigned teachers. Eighty-five percent of coaching sessions were completed as scheduled (<i>n</i> = 505 of 592). After the completion of coaching visits, clinicians attended bi-weekly virtual group sessions for two months. Ninety percent of virtual group sessions were completed as scheduled. Clinicians indicated high levels of satisfaction and high likelihood of using BRIDGE in future. Additionally, clinicians’ self-reported knowledge of BRIDGE practices and their comfort with training others in these evidence-based classroom practices improved from pre- to post- training and coaching. Expert coaches indicated that clinicians’ knowledge of BRIDGE strategies, commitment to BRIDGE consultation, and likelihood of continuing to use BRIDGE strategies were high. These findings suggest that the adapted BRIDGE model is feasible and was perceived to be effective. We share lessons learned related to community-partnered, school intervention adaptation and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51538,"journal":{"name":"School Mental Health","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Community-Partnered Process for Adapting a Mental Health Teacher Consultation Model for a Large-Scale Roll-out in Urban Schools\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Albright, Julie Worley, Samantha Rushworth, Elise Cappella, Sophia Hwang, Shannon Testa, Biiftu Duresso, Natalie Dallard, Jayme Banks, Cherry Du, Gwendolyn M. Lawson, Courtney Benjamin Wolk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12310-024-09645-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bridging Mental Health and Education (BRIDGE) is an evidence-based model for embedding teacher consultation and coaching activities into school-based mental health clinicians’ regular workflow. Here we describe the process of adapting BRIDGE in partnership with a large urban school district and a local managed care organization during a large-scale implementation effort. We also report the feasibility and perceived effectiveness of the adapted training and consultation model as reported by clinicians in one school year. Over 93% of trained clinicians (<i>n</i> = 75) initiated coaching sessions with assigned teachers. Eighty-five percent of coaching sessions were completed as scheduled (<i>n</i> = 505 of 592). After the completion of coaching visits, clinicians attended bi-weekly virtual group sessions for two months. Ninety percent of virtual group sessions were completed as scheduled. Clinicians indicated high levels of satisfaction and high likelihood of using BRIDGE in future. Additionally, clinicians’ self-reported knowledge of BRIDGE practices and their comfort with training others in these evidence-based classroom practices improved from pre- to post- training and coaching. Expert coaches indicated that clinicians’ knowledge of BRIDGE strategies, commitment to BRIDGE consultation, and likelihood of continuing to use BRIDGE strategies were high. These findings suggest that the adapted BRIDGE model is feasible and was perceived to be effective. We share lessons learned related to community-partnered, school intervention adaptation and implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09645-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09645-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理健康与教育的桥梁(BRIDGE)是一种以证据为基础的模式,用于将教师咨询和辅导活动嵌入学校心理健康临床医生的常规工作流程中。在此,我们介绍了在大规模实施过程中,与一个大型城市学区和当地管理性医疗机构合作对 BRIDGE 进行调整的过程。我们还报告了临床医生在一个学年中对调整后的培训和咨询模式的可行性和有效性的看法。超过 93% 接受过培训的临床医生(n = 75)开始对指定教师进行辅导。85%的辅导课如期完成(592 人中的 505 人)。辅导访问结束后,临床医生每两周参加一次虚拟小组会议,为期两个月。90% 的虚拟小组课程如期完成。临床医生对 BRIDGE 的满意度很高,并表示今后很有可能继续使用 BRIDGE。此外,从培训和辅导前到培训和辅导后,临床医生对 BRIDGE 实践的自述知识以及他们在培训他人使用这些循证课堂实践时的舒适度都有所提高。专家辅导员指出,临床医生对 BRIDGE 策略的了解、对 BRIDGE 咨询的承诺以及继续使用 BRIDGE 策略的可能性都很高。这些研究结果表明,经过调整的 BRIDGE 模式是可行的,而且被认为是有效的。我们分享了与社区合作、学校干预调整和实施相关的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Community-Partnered Process for Adapting a Mental Health Teacher Consultation Model for a Large-Scale Roll-out in Urban Schools

Bridging Mental Health and Education (BRIDGE) is an evidence-based model for embedding teacher consultation and coaching activities into school-based mental health clinicians’ regular workflow. Here we describe the process of adapting BRIDGE in partnership with a large urban school district and a local managed care organization during a large-scale implementation effort. We also report the feasibility and perceived effectiveness of the adapted training and consultation model as reported by clinicians in one school year. Over 93% of trained clinicians (n = 75) initiated coaching sessions with assigned teachers. Eighty-five percent of coaching sessions were completed as scheduled (n = 505 of 592). After the completion of coaching visits, clinicians attended bi-weekly virtual group sessions for two months. Ninety percent of virtual group sessions were completed as scheduled. Clinicians indicated high levels of satisfaction and high likelihood of using BRIDGE in future. Additionally, clinicians’ self-reported knowledge of BRIDGE practices and their comfort with training others in these evidence-based classroom practices improved from pre- to post- training and coaching. Expert coaches indicated that clinicians’ knowledge of BRIDGE strategies, commitment to BRIDGE consultation, and likelihood of continuing to use BRIDGE strategies were high. These findings suggest that the adapted BRIDGE model is feasible and was perceived to be effective. We share lessons learned related to community-partnered, school intervention adaptation and implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal is a forum for the latest research related to prevention, treatment, and assessment practices that are associated with the pre-K to 12th-grade education system and focuses on children and adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders. The journal publishes empirical studies, quantitative and qualitative research, and systematic and scoping review articles from authors representing the many disciplines that are involved in school mental health, including child and school psychology, education, pediatrics, child and adolescent psychiatry, developmental psychology, school counseling, social work and nursing.  Sample topics include: ·         Innovative school-based treatment practices·         Consultation and professional development procedures·         Dissemination and implementation science targeting schools·         Educational techniques for children with emotional and behavioral disorders·         Schoolwide prevention programs·         Medication effects on school behavior and achievement·         Assessment practices·         Special education services·         Developmental implications affecting learning and behavior·         Racial, ethnic, and cultural issues·         School policy·         Role of families in school mental health·         Prediction of impairment and resilience·         Moderators and mediators of response to treatment
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Design of an Inclusive Education Model for Students with Emotional Disabilities: A Research-Practice-Policy Partnership Soft Expulsion: What Happens When School-Based Supports aren’t Enough The Role of Teachers in Fostering Resilience After a Disaster in Indonesia Factors Associated with School Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Delivering a Tier 2 CBT-Based Programme in Schools Factor Structure and Criterion Validity of the 15-item Network Relationship Inventory-Social Provisions Version (NRI-SPV-15) in Chinese Children and Adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1