多样性计划和上市后研究:美国预期多元化要求的第一印象

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00643-4
Blake Schouest, Krithi Rao Bindal
{"title":"多样性计划和上市后研究:美国预期多元化要求的第一印象","authors":"Blake Schouest, Krithi Rao Bindal","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00643-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft guidelines are intended to improve representation and formalize the assessment of race and ethnicity in drug development, but how regulators and industry stakeholders plan to implement and enforce new requirements is still being determined.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>Here, a 10-question survey was developed to assess the experiences of industry stakeholders in developing diversity plans. These survey results informed an analysis of postmarketing studies to understand how diversity requirements have been enforced to date.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results and Discussion</h3><p>Among 13 survey responders, experience submitting and receiving feedback on diversity plans was limited. A variety of challenges have been associated with developing these plans, including questions regarding regulatory guidance. Sponsors have utilized several data sources, including real-world datasets, to define enrollment goals. Diversity-related postmarketing studies most commonly related to oncologic diseases, and endpoints frequently related to efficacy. Most marketing applications associated with diversity-related postmarketing studies received Orphan drug designation (ODD) and Accelerated Approval.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>These results show that industry experience with diversity plans remains limited in the absence of finalized regulatory guidance. Sponsors are beginning to develop strategies for submitting diversity plans, which include identifying key functions and data sources to support enrollment goals, although definitive conclusions were difficult to draw from the small responder pool. In the postmarketing setting, studies are already underway to improve the understanding of racial and ethnic differences in responses to approved drugs. Development programs relating to oncology, which has historically suffered from a lack of diverse representation, have been a primary focus of such studies thus far.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity Plans and Postmarketing Studies: First Impressions of Anticipated Diversity Requirements in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Blake Schouest, Krithi Rao Bindal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-024-00643-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>Recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft guidelines are intended to improve representation and formalize the assessment of race and ethnicity in drug development, but how regulators and industry stakeholders plan to implement and enforce new requirements is still being determined.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Materials and methods</h3><p>Here, a 10-question survey was developed to assess the experiences of industry stakeholders in developing diversity plans. These survey results informed an analysis of postmarketing studies to understand how diversity requirements have been enforced to date.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results and Discussion</h3><p>Among 13 survey responders, experience submitting and receiving feedback on diversity plans was limited. A variety of challenges have been associated with developing these plans, including questions regarding regulatory guidance. Sponsors have utilized several data sources, including real-world datasets, to define enrollment goals. Diversity-related postmarketing studies most commonly related to oncologic diseases, and endpoints frequently related to efficacy. Most marketing applications associated with diversity-related postmarketing studies received Orphan drug designation (ODD) and Accelerated Approval.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>These results show that industry experience with diversity plans remains limited in the absence of finalized regulatory guidance. Sponsors are beginning to develop strategies for submitting diversity plans, which include identifying key functions and data sources to support enrollment goals, although definitive conclusions were difficult to draw from the small responder pool. In the postmarketing setting, studies are already underway to improve the understanding of racial and ethnic differences in responses to approved drugs. Development programs relating to oncology, which has historically suffered from a lack of diverse representation, have been a primary focus of such studies thus far.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00643-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00643-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言最近的食品药品管理局(FDA)指导方针草案旨在改善药物开发中的种族和民族代表性并使评估正规化,但监管机构和行业利益相关者计划如何实施和执行新要求仍有待确定。材料和方法在此,我们制定了一项包含 10 个问题的调查,以评估行业利益相关者在制定多样性计划方面的经验。这些调查结果为上市后研究分析提供了信息,以了解迄今为止是如何执行多样性要求的。结果与讨论在 13 位调查回复者中,提交和接收多样性计划反馈的经验有限。在制定这些计划的过程中遇到了各种挑战,包括有关监管指南的问题。申办者利用多种数据来源(包括真实世界数据集)来确定注册目标。与多样性相关的上市后研究最常见的是与肿瘤疾病有关的研究,研究终点通常与疗效有关。与多样性相关的上市后研究相关的大多数上市申请都获得了孤儿药认定 (ODD) 和加速批准。申办者正在开始制定提交多样性计划的策略,其中包括确定关键功能和数据来源,以支持入组目标,尽管从少量回复者中很难得出明确的结论。在上市后环境中,已经开始进行研究,以更好地了解种族和民族对已批准药物的反应差异。迄今为止,与肿瘤学相关的开发项目一直是此类研究的主要重点,而肿瘤学历来缺乏多元化代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diversity Plans and Postmarketing Studies: First Impressions of Anticipated Diversity Requirements in the United States

Introduction

Recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft guidelines are intended to improve representation and formalize the assessment of race and ethnicity in drug development, but how regulators and industry stakeholders plan to implement and enforce new requirements is still being determined.

Materials and methods

Here, a 10-question survey was developed to assess the experiences of industry stakeholders in developing diversity plans. These survey results informed an analysis of postmarketing studies to understand how diversity requirements have been enforced to date.

Results and Discussion

Among 13 survey responders, experience submitting and receiving feedback on diversity plans was limited. A variety of challenges have been associated with developing these plans, including questions regarding regulatory guidance. Sponsors have utilized several data sources, including real-world datasets, to define enrollment goals. Diversity-related postmarketing studies most commonly related to oncologic diseases, and endpoints frequently related to efficacy. Most marketing applications associated with diversity-related postmarketing studies received Orphan drug designation (ODD) and Accelerated Approval.

Conclusions

These results show that industry experience with diversity plans remains limited in the absence of finalized regulatory guidance. Sponsors are beginning to develop strategies for submitting diversity plans, which include identifying key functions and data sources to support enrollment goals, although definitive conclusions were difficult to draw from the small responder pool. In the postmarketing setting, studies are already underway to improve the understanding of racial and ethnic differences in responses to approved drugs. Development programs relating to oncology, which has historically suffered from a lack of diverse representation, have been a primary focus of such studies thus far.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Efficiency of eSource Direct Data Capture in Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials in Oncology. Mutagenic Azido Impurities in Drug Substances: A Perspective. Draft Guideline for Industry to Manage Drug Shortages in Japan. Unleashing the Power of Reliance for Post-Approval Changes: A Journey with 48 National Regulatory Authorities. A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating the Value Created by Real-World Evidence for Diverse Stakeholders: The Case for Coordinated Registry Networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1