针对晚期成人患者及其家庭照顾者的电话咨询热线:定性分析和新颖的实用框架

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1177/02692163241242329
Sophie Pask, Allen Omoruyi, Ahmed Mohamed, Rachel L Chambers, Phillippa G McFarlane, Therese Johansson, Rashmi Kumar, Andy Woodhead, Ikumi Okamoto, Stephen Barclay, Irene J Higginson, Katherine E Sleeman, Fliss EM Murtagh
{"title":"针对晚期成人患者及其家庭照顾者的电话咨询热线:定性分析和新颖的实用框架","authors":"Sophie Pask, Allen Omoruyi, Ahmed Mohamed, Rachel L Chambers, Phillippa G McFarlane, Therese Johansson, Rashmi Kumar, Andy Woodhead, Ikumi Okamoto, Stephen Barclay, Irene J Higginson, Katherine E Sleeman, Fliss EM Murtagh","doi":"10.1177/02692163241242329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Telephone advice lines have been recommended internationally to support around-the-clock care for people living at home with advanced illness. While they undoubtedly support care, there is little evidence about what elements are needed for success. A national picture is needed to understand, improve and standardise service delivery/care.Aim:To explore telephone advice lines for people living at home with advanced illness across the four UK nations, and to construct a practical framework to improve services.Design:A cross-national evaluation of telephone advice lines using structured qualitative interviews. A patient and public involvement workshop was conducted to refine the framework.Setting/participants:Professionals with responsibilities for how palliative care services are delivered and/or funded at a local or regional level, were purposively sampled.Results:Seventy-one interviews were conducted, covering 60 geographical areas. Five themes were identified. Availability: Ten advice line models were described. Variation led to confusion about who to call and when. Accessibility, awareness and promotion: It was assumed that patients/carers know who to call out-of-hours, but often they did not. Practicalities: Call handlers skills/expertise varied, which influenced how calls were managed. Possible responses ranged from signposting to organising home visits. Integration/continuity of care: Integration between care providers was limited by electronic medical records access/information sharing. Service structure/commissioning: Sustained funding was often an issue for charitably funded organisations.Conclusions:Our novel evidence-based practical framework could be transformative for service design/delivery, as it presents key considerations relating to the various elements of advice lines that may impact on the patient/carer experience.","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telephone advice lines for adults with advanced illness and their family carers: a qualitative analysis and novel practical framework\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Pask, Allen Omoruyi, Ahmed Mohamed, Rachel L Chambers, Phillippa G McFarlane, Therese Johansson, Rashmi Kumar, Andy Woodhead, Ikumi Okamoto, Stephen Barclay, Irene J Higginson, Katherine E Sleeman, Fliss EM Murtagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163241242329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Telephone advice lines have been recommended internationally to support around-the-clock care for people living at home with advanced illness. While they undoubtedly support care, there is little evidence about what elements are needed for success. A national picture is needed to understand, improve and standardise service delivery/care.Aim:To explore telephone advice lines for people living at home with advanced illness across the four UK nations, and to construct a practical framework to improve services.Design:A cross-national evaluation of telephone advice lines using structured qualitative interviews. A patient and public involvement workshop was conducted to refine the framework.Setting/participants:Professionals with responsibilities for how palliative care services are delivered and/or funded at a local or regional level, were purposively sampled.Results:Seventy-one interviews were conducted, covering 60 geographical areas. Five themes were identified. Availability: Ten advice line models were described. Variation led to confusion about who to call and when. Accessibility, awareness and promotion: It was assumed that patients/carers know who to call out-of-hours, but often they did not. Practicalities: Call handlers skills/expertise varied, which influenced how calls were managed. Possible responses ranged from signposting to organising home visits. Integration/continuity of care: Integration between care providers was limited by electronic medical records access/information sharing. Service structure/commissioning: Sustained funding was often an issue for charitably funded organisations.Conclusions:Our novel evidence-based practical framework could be transformative for service design/delivery, as it presents key considerations relating to the various elements of advice lines that may impact on the patient/carer experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241242329\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241242329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电话咨询热线在国际上被推荐用于支持对居家晚期病人的全天候护理。电话咨询热线无疑为护理工作提供了支持,但有关成功需要哪些要素的证据却很少。目的:探讨英国四个国家为居家晚期患者提供的电话咨询热线,并构建一个实用框架以改善服务。设计:采用结构化定性访谈对电话咨询热线进行跨国评估。环境/参与者:有目的性地抽取了在地方或区域层面负责姑息关怀服务提供和/或资助的专业人士。结果:共进行了 71 次访谈,覆盖 60 个地理区域。确定了五个主题。可用性:介绍了十种咨询热线模式。这些模式各不相同,导致人们对何时向谁拨打电话感到困惑。可及性、认知度和推广:人们假定病人/护理人员知道在非工作时间该给谁打电话,但他们往往不知道。实用性:呼叫处理人员的技能/专业知识各不相同,这影响了呼叫的处理方式。可能的应对措施包括从指路到组织家访。整合/持续护理:医疗服务提供者之间的整合受到电子病历访问/信息共享的限制。服务结构/委托:结论:我们新颖的循证实用框架可为服务设计/交付带来变革,因为它提出了与咨询热线的各种要素有关的关键考虑因素,这些要素可能会影响患者/护理者的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telephone advice lines for adults with advanced illness and their family carers: a qualitative analysis and novel practical framework
Background:Telephone advice lines have been recommended internationally to support around-the-clock care for people living at home with advanced illness. While they undoubtedly support care, there is little evidence about what elements are needed for success. A national picture is needed to understand, improve and standardise service delivery/care.Aim:To explore telephone advice lines for people living at home with advanced illness across the four UK nations, and to construct a practical framework to improve services.Design:A cross-national evaluation of telephone advice lines using structured qualitative interviews. A patient and public involvement workshop was conducted to refine the framework.Setting/participants:Professionals with responsibilities for how palliative care services are delivered and/or funded at a local or regional level, were purposively sampled.Results:Seventy-one interviews were conducted, covering 60 geographical areas. Five themes were identified. Availability: Ten advice line models were described. Variation led to confusion about who to call and when. Accessibility, awareness and promotion: It was assumed that patients/carers know who to call out-of-hours, but often they did not. Practicalities: Call handlers skills/expertise varied, which influenced how calls were managed. Possible responses ranged from signposting to organising home visits. Integration/continuity of care: Integration between care providers was limited by electronic medical records access/information sharing. Service structure/commissioning: Sustained funding was often an issue for charitably funded organisations.Conclusions:Our novel evidence-based practical framework could be transformative for service design/delivery, as it presents key considerations relating to the various elements of advice lines that may impact on the patient/carer experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Utilizing intricate care networks: An ethnography of patients and families navigating palliative care in a resource-limited setting. Definition and recommendations of advance care planning: A Delphi study in five Asian sectors. Pharmacological treatment of pain, dyspnea, death rattle, fever, nausea, and vomiting in the last days of life in older people: A systematic review. A pragmatic approach to selecting a grading system for clinical practice recommendations in palliative care. 'A good ending but not the end': Exploring family preparations surrounding a relative's death and the Afterlife - A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1