公司董事会的性别配额:它们是否会使更多的妇女进入高级行政管理层?

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Gender in Management Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1108/gm-03-2023-0096
Sigtona Halrynjo, Mari Teigen
{"title":"公司董事会的性别配额:它们是否会使更多的妇女进入高级行政管理层?","authors":"Sigtona Halrynjo, Mari Teigen","doi":"10.1108/gm-03-2023-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The European Union (EU) has recently adopted gender quotas for corporate boards (CBQ), anticipating ripple effects on women’s careers in the companies concerned, as well as throughout the economy. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether CBQ has spurred ripple effects and discuss mechanisms hindering or facilitating women’s occupancy of top executive positions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Norway was the first country in the world to introduce CBQ in 2003, with full effect from 2008. The policy requires company boards to be composed of 40% of each gender. Drawing on original data mapping boards and executive committees in Norway’s 200 largest companies, the authors analyze the association between CBQ and the gender composition of executive management almost 15 years after the full implementation. The data include both companies covered by the CBQ and large companies not covered.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The investigation does not find a positive association between CBQ and more women in executive positions. Thus, the ripple effect hypothesis of CBQ is not supported. CBQ may have contributed to an increased awareness of gender imbalances, yet these findings indicate that to achieve more gender balance in executive positions, scholars and practitioners may need to focus more on gendered conditions and processes in organizations and society throughout executive careers than on the gender composition of boards.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper provides empirical analyses of original data 15 years after the implementation of CBQ. The authors further contribute to scholarly debate by identifying and discussing possible mechanisms that explain how requiring more women on corporate boards may – or may not – have ripple effects on executive management.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47117,"journal":{"name":"Gender in Management","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender quotas for corporate boards: do they lead to more women in senior executive management?\",\"authors\":\"Sigtona Halrynjo, Mari Teigen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/gm-03-2023-0096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The European Union (EU) has recently adopted gender quotas for corporate boards (CBQ), anticipating ripple effects on women’s careers in the companies concerned, as well as throughout the economy. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether CBQ has spurred ripple effects and discuss mechanisms hindering or facilitating women’s occupancy of top executive positions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Norway was the first country in the world to introduce CBQ in 2003, with full effect from 2008. The policy requires company boards to be composed of 40% of each gender. Drawing on original data mapping boards and executive committees in Norway’s 200 largest companies, the authors analyze the association between CBQ and the gender composition of executive management almost 15 years after the full implementation. The data include both companies covered by the CBQ and large companies not covered.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The investigation does not find a positive association between CBQ and more women in executive positions. Thus, the ripple effect hypothesis of CBQ is not supported. CBQ may have contributed to an increased awareness of gender imbalances, yet these findings indicate that to achieve more gender balance in executive positions, scholars and practitioners may need to focus more on gendered conditions and processes in organizations and society throughout executive careers than on the gender composition of boards.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper provides empirical analyses of original data 15 years after the implementation of CBQ. The authors further contribute to scholarly debate by identifying and discussing possible mechanisms that explain how requiring more women on corporate boards may – or may not – have ripple effects on executive management.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender in Management\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender in Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-03-2023-0096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender in Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-03-2023-0096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的欧洲联盟(欧盟)最近通过了公司董事会性别配额(CBQ),预计将对相关公司乃至整个经济中的女性职业生涯产生连锁反应。本文旨在调查 CBQ 是否产生了连锁反应,并讨论阻碍或促进女性担任高层管理职位的机制。设计/方法/途径挪威是世界上第一个于 2003 年引入 CBQ 的国家,并于 2008 年全面生效。该政策要求公司董事会中男女比例各占 40%。作者根据挪威200家最大公司董事会和执行委员会的原始数据,分析了CBQ全面实施近15年后,公司董事会和执行管理层性别构成之间的关联。调查结果显示,CBQ 与更多女性担任高管职位之间没有正相关关系。因此,CBQ 的涟漪效应假设没有得到支持。CBQ 可能有助于提高人们对性别失衡的认识,但这些研究结果表明,要想在高管职位上实现更多的性别平衡,学者和从业人员可能需要更多地关注组织和社会在整个高管职业生涯中的性别条件和过程,而不是董事会的性别构成。作者通过确定和讨论可能的机制,解释了要求更多女性进入公司董事会可能会--也可能不会--对高管管理产生连锁反应,从而为学术辩论做出了进一步贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender quotas for corporate boards: do they lead to more women in senior executive management?

Purpose

The European Union (EU) has recently adopted gender quotas for corporate boards (CBQ), anticipating ripple effects on women’s careers in the companies concerned, as well as throughout the economy. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether CBQ has spurred ripple effects and discuss mechanisms hindering or facilitating women’s occupancy of top executive positions.

Design/methodology/approach

Norway was the first country in the world to introduce CBQ in 2003, with full effect from 2008. The policy requires company boards to be composed of 40% of each gender. Drawing on original data mapping boards and executive committees in Norway’s 200 largest companies, the authors analyze the association between CBQ and the gender composition of executive management almost 15 years after the full implementation. The data include both companies covered by the CBQ and large companies not covered.

Findings

The investigation does not find a positive association between CBQ and more women in executive positions. Thus, the ripple effect hypothesis of CBQ is not supported. CBQ may have contributed to an increased awareness of gender imbalances, yet these findings indicate that to achieve more gender balance in executive positions, scholars and practitioners may need to focus more on gendered conditions and processes in organizations and society throughout executive careers than on the gender composition of boards.

Originality/value

This paper provides empirical analyses of original data 15 years after the implementation of CBQ. The authors further contribute to scholarly debate by identifying and discussing possible mechanisms that explain how requiring more women on corporate boards may – or may not – have ripple effects on executive management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Coverage (includes, but is not restricted to): ■Equal opportunities law ■Flexibility at work and part-time working ■Male/female working styles ■Networking ■Performance appraisal ■Sexual politics ■Entrepreneurship ■Cross-cultural issues ■Employee-employer relationships ■Sexuality and sexual orientation ■Career influences/determinants ■Glass ceiling issues ■Employment disparities e.g. pay Companies often fail to recognize or realize the potential of women professionals by failing to respond positively to women who have created successful managerial roles for themselves.
期刊最新文献
Board gender diversity and financial stability COVID-19 vs pre-COVID-19 era Dominance needs, gender, and leader emergence in self-managed work teams The role of female managers in enhancing employee well-being: a path through workplace resources Exploring how institutionalized patriarchy relates to career outcomes among African women: evidence from Nigeria Does board gender diversity affect bank financial stability? Evidence from a transitional economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1