Original Research: Clinical Significance of a Unique Pediatric EEG Configuration: Bi-Frontal Spikes With Simultaneous Bi-Occipital Positivity

Introduction: Frontal-predominant epileptiform discharges (EDs) include generalized spike-wave (GSW) and frontal spikes (FS). However, negative bi-frontal ED with simultaneous occipital positivity (BFOD) are rare, leading to questions regarding physiological generators. Methods: To determine the clinical significance of BFOD, electroclinical features of children with BFOD (n = 40) were compared to control patients with GSW (n = 102) and FS (n = 100). Results: Results are presented in the following order: BFOD, GSW, and FS. Epilepsy was prevalent among the groups: 95.0%, 90.2%, and 77.0%, respectively. The median age of seizure-onset did not significantly differ between groups: 3.00, 4.00, and 2.25 years, respectively. Regarding EEG background features, the BFOD group had more disorganized sleep architecture than other groups, P < .005. There was a significant difference in the proportion of developmental delay (DD) between the groups ( P < .005). BFOD had much higher odds of DD compared to GSW and FS groups: odds ratio (OR) (confidence interval [CI]) 19.44 [5.64, 64.05] and 3.98 [1.16, 13.34]. Furthermore, BFOD had much higher odds of severe DD compared to GSW and FS groups: 9.60 [2.75, 33.45] and 2.73 [1.03, 7.27]. A Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) score of ≥ 4 was more prevalent in BFOD (22.5%), than GSW (0%) and FS groups (9%). On neuroimaging, BFOD had more structural ( P < .005) and multilobar structural ( P < .05) abnormalities than control groups. Conclusion: Children with BFOD had particularly severe significant DD, considerable motor deficit (GMFCS ≥ 4), and brain structural abnormalities, often multilobar. This suggests BFOD is a marker of severe underlying brain dysfunction and not benign when encountered on routine EEG review.