影响信息生态系统演变的因素:制度理论视角

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Aslib Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1108/ajim-12-2023-0565
Tung-Cheng Lin, Mei-Ling Yeh
{"title":"影响信息生态系统演变的因素:制度理论视角","authors":"Tung-Cheng Lin, Mei-Ling Yeh","doi":"10.1108/ajim-12-2023-0565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The ecosystem concept has attracted attention in information system research to explain business competition, innovation and many other emerging phenomena. Existing studies focus more on a single ecosystem type or a single ecosystem goal and pay little attention to the ecosystem’s evolution. The objective of the study is to investigate the factors that impact the evolution of the information ecosystem (IE) to gain a better understanding of strategic thinking.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The IE involves many actors, so the multi-case study approach is conducted with purposeful sampling to recruit all the significant ecosystem actors. The collected qualitative data are analyzed by coding data, exploring data relationships and structuring pattern steps; institutional theory is used as a theoretical framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results demonstrate that industry practices, laws and regulations, new actors and the mimetic pressure of outsourcers drive the growth of the ecosystem. Strategy intention, cost pressure and normative pressure all contribute to the IE’s evolution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The concept of ecosystems has attracted attention in information system research. The study investigates the factors contributing to the evolution of the IE from an institutional theory perspective. Our suggestion is that new players can find a niche in offering information technology (IT)/ information services (IS)-related solutions to survive in the ecosystem; however, they need to pay attention to the normative pressure.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":53152,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing the evolution of information ecosystems: an institutional theory perspective\",\"authors\":\"Tung-Cheng Lin, Mei-Ling Yeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ajim-12-2023-0565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The ecosystem concept has attracted attention in information system research to explain business competition, innovation and many other emerging phenomena. Existing studies focus more on a single ecosystem type or a single ecosystem goal and pay little attention to the ecosystem’s evolution. The objective of the study is to investigate the factors that impact the evolution of the information ecosystem (IE) to gain a better understanding of strategic thinking.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The IE involves many actors, so the multi-case study approach is conducted with purposeful sampling to recruit all the significant ecosystem actors. The collected qualitative data are analyzed by coding data, exploring data relationships and structuring pattern steps; institutional theory is used as a theoretical framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results demonstrate that industry practices, laws and regulations, new actors and the mimetic pressure of outsourcers drive the growth of the ecosystem. Strategy intention, cost pressure and normative pressure all contribute to the IE’s evolution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The concept of ecosystems has attracted attention in information system research. The study investigates the factors contributing to the evolution of the IE from an institutional theory perspective. Our suggestion is that new players can find a niche in offering information technology (IT)/ information services (IS)-related solutions to survive in the ecosystem; however, they need to pay attention to the normative pressure.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":53152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aslib Journal of Information Management\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aslib Journal of Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-12-2023-0565\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-12-2023-0565","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 生态系统的概念在信息系统研究中备受关注,它可以解释商业竞争、创新和许多其他新兴现象。现有研究更多地关注单一生态系统类型或单一生态系统目标,而很少关注生态系统的演变。本研究的目的是调查影响信息生态系统(IE)演变的因素,从而更好地理解战略思维。设计/方法/途径IE涉及许多参与者,因此采用多案例研究法,有目的地抽样招募所有重要的生态系统参与者。研究结果表明,行业惯例、法律法规、新的参与者和外包商的模仿压力推动了生态系统的发展。战略意图、成本压力和规范压力都促进了 IE 的发展。本研究从制度理论的视角出发,探讨了促进综合环境演变的因素。我们的建议是,新的参与者可以在提供信息技术(IT)/信息服务(IS)相关解决方案方面找到自己的位置,从而在生态系统中生存下来;但是,他们需要关注规范压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors influencing the evolution of information ecosystems: an institutional theory perspective

Purpose

The ecosystem concept has attracted attention in information system research to explain business competition, innovation and many other emerging phenomena. Existing studies focus more on a single ecosystem type or a single ecosystem goal and pay little attention to the ecosystem’s evolution. The objective of the study is to investigate the factors that impact the evolution of the information ecosystem (IE) to gain a better understanding of strategic thinking.

Design/methodology/approach

The IE involves many actors, so the multi-case study approach is conducted with purposeful sampling to recruit all the significant ecosystem actors. The collected qualitative data are analyzed by coding data, exploring data relationships and structuring pattern steps; institutional theory is used as a theoretical framework.

Findings

The results demonstrate that industry practices, laws and regulations, new actors and the mimetic pressure of outsourcers drive the growth of the ecosystem. Strategy intention, cost pressure and normative pressure all contribute to the IE’s evolution.

Originality/value

The concept of ecosystems has attracted attention in information system research. The study investigates the factors contributing to the evolution of the IE from an institutional theory perspective. Our suggestion is that new players can find a niche in offering information technology (IT)/ information services (IS)-related solutions to survive in the ecosystem; however, they need to pay attention to the normative pressure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Aslib Journal of Information Management COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.20%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Aslib Journal of Information Management covers a broad range of issues in the field, including economic, behavioural, social, ethical, technological, international, business-related, political and management-orientated factors. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work. Aslib Journal of Information Management Areas of interest include topics such as social media, data protection, search engines, information retrieval, digital libraries, information behaviour, intellectual property and copyright, information industry, digital repositories and information policy and governance.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of team engagement on patient satisfaction: insights from social support and transactive memory system Factors affecting user intention to use social commerce continuously from a habit perspective What decision-making process do mHealth users go through when faced with privacy disclosure behaviors? A dual trade-off perspective Collaborative online shopping: customer satisfaction and the influence of product type, gender and involvement An associative text analyzer to facilitate effectiveness of exploring historical texts for digital humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1