Diego Valdivieso, Jose L. Almazán, Diego Lopez-Garcia, Jairo Montaño, Abbie B. Liel, Pablo Guindos
{"title":"T 型木剪力墙的系统效应:横墙、隔墙和轴向荷载的影响","authors":"Diego Valdivieso, Jose L. Almazán, Diego Lopez-Garcia, Jairo Montaño, Abbie B. Liel, Pablo Guindos","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the effects of transverse shear walls (TSWs), out-of-plane bending stiffness of diaphragms (FDIA), and axial loading (AXL) on the lateral response of strong wood-frame shear walls (SWs) used for multistory light frame timber buildings (LFTBs) located in highly active seismic zones. Experimental tests were conducted to understand the requirements for SW-to-TSW connections to achieve desirable TSW effects in non-planar SWs and to characterize the lateral cyclic response of T-shaped SW assemblies with and without diaphragms and axial load. Both slotted and screwed connections were evaluated as SW-to-TSW connections, and both showed sufficient stiffness and strength to achieve TSW effects. However, the slotted connection is preferred because it has a more ductile failure mode. Tests on T-shaped SW assemblies with and without diaphragms and axial load revealed that TSWs significantly enhance the lateral stiffness and strength but reduce the deformation capacity with respect to that of planar SWs. FDIA and AXL effects further influence the stiffness and strength, overcoming the limitation of smaller deformation capacity in T-shaped SWs without diaphragms. Diaphragms also make the T-shaped SW response more symmetrical and improve the evolution of the secant stiffness, the cumulative dissipated energy, and the equivalent viscous damping over increasing levels of lateral drift. Numerical analyses of a theoretical building model with T-shaped SWs show significant reductions in lateral drift (up to 46%) and uplift (up to 100%) compared to the case with planar SWs only, emphasizing the importance of considering system effects in the seismic design of LFTBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System effects in T-shaped timber shear walls: Effects of transverse walls, diaphragms, and axial loading\",\"authors\":\"Diego Valdivieso, Jose L. Almazán, Diego Lopez-Garcia, Jairo Montaño, Abbie B. Liel, Pablo Guindos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eqe.4125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper investigates the effects of transverse shear walls (TSWs), out-of-plane bending stiffness of diaphragms (FDIA), and axial loading (AXL) on the lateral response of strong wood-frame shear walls (SWs) used for multistory light frame timber buildings (LFTBs) located in highly active seismic zones. Experimental tests were conducted to understand the requirements for SW-to-TSW connections to achieve desirable TSW effects in non-planar SWs and to characterize the lateral cyclic response of T-shaped SW assemblies with and without diaphragms and axial load. Both slotted and screwed connections were evaluated as SW-to-TSW connections, and both showed sufficient stiffness and strength to achieve TSW effects. However, the slotted connection is preferred because it has a more ductile failure mode. Tests on T-shaped SW assemblies with and without diaphragms and axial load revealed that TSWs significantly enhance the lateral stiffness and strength but reduce the deformation capacity with respect to that of planar SWs. FDIA and AXL effects further influence the stiffness and strength, overcoming the limitation of smaller deformation capacity in T-shaped SWs without diaphragms. Diaphragms also make the T-shaped SW response more symmetrical and improve the evolution of the secant stiffness, the cumulative dissipated energy, and the equivalent viscous damping over increasing levels of lateral drift. Numerical analyses of a theoretical building model with T-shaped SWs show significant reductions in lateral drift (up to 46%) and uplift (up to 100%) compared to the case with planar SWs only, emphasizing the importance of considering system effects in the seismic design of LFTBs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4125\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文研究了横向剪力墙 (TSW)、隔墙的平面外弯曲刚度 (FDIA) 和轴向荷载 (AXL) 对位于地震高度活跃区的多层轻型框架木结构建筑 (LFTB) 的强木结构剪力墙 (SW) 横向响应的影响。实验测试的目的是了解为在非平面剪力墙中实现理想的剪力墙效应而对剪力墙到剪力墙连接的要求,并确定有隔墙和无隔墙及轴向载荷的 T 型剪力墙组件的横向循环响应特性。开槽连接和螺纹连接都作为 SW 对 TSW 连接进行了评估,两者都显示出足够的刚度和强度来实现 TSW 效果。不过,开槽连接更受青睐,因为它的失效模式更具延展性。对有隔膜和无隔膜的 T 形 SW 组件以及轴向载荷的测试表明,与平面 SW 相比,TSW 可显著提高横向刚度和强度,但降低变形能力。FDIA 和 AXL 效应进一步影响了刚度和强度,克服了无隔膜 T 形 SW 变形能力较小的限制。隔膜还使 T 型 SW 的响应更加对称,并改善了随侧向漂移水平增加而变化的秒刚度、累积耗散能量和等效粘性阻尼。对采用 T 型 SW 的理论建筑模型进行的数值分析表明,与仅采用平面 SW 的情况相比,侧向漂移(最多 46% )和上浮(最多 100% )显著减少,这强调了在低地基轻质结构抗震设计中考虑系统效应的重要性。
System effects in T-shaped timber shear walls: Effects of transverse walls, diaphragms, and axial loading
This paper investigates the effects of transverse shear walls (TSWs), out-of-plane bending stiffness of diaphragms (FDIA), and axial loading (AXL) on the lateral response of strong wood-frame shear walls (SWs) used for multistory light frame timber buildings (LFTBs) located in highly active seismic zones. Experimental tests were conducted to understand the requirements for SW-to-TSW connections to achieve desirable TSW effects in non-planar SWs and to characterize the lateral cyclic response of T-shaped SW assemblies with and without diaphragms and axial load. Both slotted and screwed connections were evaluated as SW-to-TSW connections, and both showed sufficient stiffness and strength to achieve TSW effects. However, the slotted connection is preferred because it has a more ductile failure mode. Tests on T-shaped SW assemblies with and without diaphragms and axial load revealed that TSWs significantly enhance the lateral stiffness and strength but reduce the deformation capacity with respect to that of planar SWs. FDIA and AXL effects further influence the stiffness and strength, overcoming the limitation of smaller deformation capacity in T-shaped SWs without diaphragms. Diaphragms also make the T-shaped SW response more symmetrical and improve the evolution of the secant stiffness, the cumulative dissipated energy, and the equivalent viscous damping over increasing levels of lateral drift. Numerical analyses of a theoretical building model with T-shaped SWs show significant reductions in lateral drift (up to 46%) and uplift (up to 100%) compared to the case with planar SWs only, emphasizing the importance of considering system effects in the seismic design of LFTBs.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following:
ground motions for analysis and design
geotechnical earthquake engineering
probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis
experimental behaviour of structures
seismic protective systems
system identification
risk assessment
seismic code requirements
methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.