国际重要湿地公约》国家报告(2021-2022 年)在性别报告方面的差距

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 FISHERIES Marine and Freshwater Research Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1071/mf23116
James C. Whitacre
{"title":"国际重要湿地公约》国家报告(2021-2022 年)在性别报告方面的差距","authors":"James C. Whitacre","doi":"10.1071/mf23116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>The Ramsar Convention is the world’s premier environmental treaty for wetlands. This perspective evaluates gender reporting in Ramsar Convention National Reports and compliance with Gender and Wetlands Resolution XIII.18. A total of 71.8% (<i>n</i> = 42) of the sampled nation reports (<i>n</i> = 133) did not submit National Reports. Zero nations provided statistics on equitable pay or pay gaps by gender. In the sampled reports, only 10 nations submitted sex-disaggregated data. Further, only 7.5% (<i>n</i> = 123) of the sampled National Reports (<i>n</i> = 133) provided sex-disaggregated gender data relevant to the Ramsar Convention. Fifteen National Reports deleted the question on gender (Section H) on from their report entirely, including Denmark and Germany. With evidence drawn from the submitted National Reports, this perspective provides concrete empirical suggestions for improving gender reporting in the future. Gender initiatives, including Resolution XIII.18 and the related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have improved transparent gender reporting in the Ramsar Convention National Reports to a degree. However, on the basis of this review, there is room for improvement in national reporting.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>National Reports from 2021 to 2022 were reviewed for all instances of ‘gender’ and then evaluated for national replies to Section H, focused on gender.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Five years after Resolution XIII.18, there is still a need for system-wide improvements in gender reporting, including sex-disaggregated data, and equity for women (cis and trans) for the Ramsar Convention to become compliant with Resolution XIII.18. Complying with Resolution XIII.18 is one concrete, global and measurable way for wetland science and policy to mainstream gender.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>No nation has prepared a comprehensive answer to Section H on gender and wetland policy and science, as defined below; instead, nations have submitted discrete elements. The analysis of each nation’s answers showed essential elements for a comprehensive answer. In the next 5 years of gender reporting, nations have the option to learn from the past and strive to comply with Resolution XIII.18 and provide transparent sex-disaggregated data on National Heads, community stakeholders, site interpreters, site managers and equitable salary data.</p>","PeriodicalId":18209,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Freshwater Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps in gender reporting in National Reports of Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (2021–2022)\",\"authors\":\"James C. Whitacre\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/mf23116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Context</strong><p>The Ramsar Convention is the world’s premier environmental treaty for wetlands. This perspective evaluates gender reporting in Ramsar Convention National Reports and compliance with Gender and Wetlands Resolution XIII.18. A total of 71.8% (<i>n</i> = 42) of the sampled nation reports (<i>n</i> = 133) did not submit National Reports. Zero nations provided statistics on equitable pay or pay gaps by gender. In the sampled reports, only 10 nations submitted sex-disaggregated data. Further, only 7.5% (<i>n</i> = 123) of the sampled National Reports (<i>n</i> = 133) provided sex-disaggregated gender data relevant to the Ramsar Convention. Fifteen National Reports deleted the question on gender (Section H) on from their report entirely, including Denmark and Germany. With evidence drawn from the submitted National Reports, this perspective provides concrete empirical suggestions for improving gender reporting in the future. Gender initiatives, including Resolution XIII.18 and the related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have improved transparent gender reporting in the Ramsar Convention National Reports to a degree. However, on the basis of this review, there is room for improvement in national reporting.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>National Reports from 2021 to 2022 were reviewed for all instances of ‘gender’ and then evaluated for national replies to Section H, focused on gender.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Five years after Resolution XIII.18, there is still a need for system-wide improvements in gender reporting, including sex-disaggregated data, and equity for women (cis and trans) for the Ramsar Convention to become compliant with Resolution XIII.18. Complying with Resolution XIII.18 is one concrete, global and measurable way for wetland science and policy to mainstream gender.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>No nation has prepared a comprehensive answer to Section H on gender and wetland policy and science, as defined below; instead, nations have submitted discrete elements. The analysis of each nation’s answers showed essential elements for a comprehensive answer. In the next 5 years of gender reporting, nations have the option to learn from the past and strive to comply with Resolution XIII.18 and provide transparent sex-disaggregated data on National Heads, community stakeholders, site interpreters, site managers and equitable salary data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine and Freshwater Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine and Freshwater Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/mf23116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Freshwater Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/mf23116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景《拉姆萨尔公约》是世界上最重要的湿地环境条约。本视角评估了《拉姆萨尔公约》国家报告中的性别报告以及性别与湿地决议 XIII.18 的遵守情况。在抽样国家报告(n = 133)中,共有 71.8%(n = 42)的国家未提交国家报告。零个国家提供了按性别划分的公平薪酬或薪酬差距的统计数据。在抽样报告中,只有 10 个国家提交了按性别分列的数据。此外,在抽样的国家报告(n = 133)中,只有 7.5% (n = 123)提供了与《拉姆萨尔公约》相关的按性别分列的数据。有 15 份国家报告完全删除了报告中的性别问题(H 部分),其中包括丹麦和德国。本视角从提交的国家报告中提取证据,为今后改进性别报告提供了具体的经验性建议。包括第 XIII.18 号决议在内的性别倡议以及相关的可持续发展目标 (SDG) 在一定程度上提高了《拉姆萨尔公约》国家报告中性别报告的透明度。但是,根据本次审查,国家报告仍有改进的余地。方法对 2021 年至 2022 年的国家报告中所有 "性别 "内容进行审查,然后评估国家对第 H 部分的答复,重点关注性别问题。主要结果第 XIII.18 号决议通过五年后,《拉姆萨尔公约》仍需在全系统范围内改进性别报告,包括按性别分列的数据,以及妇女(顺式和逆式)的公平性,以符合第 XIII.18 号决议的要求。遵守第 XIII.18 号决议是湿地科学和政策将性别观点纳入主流的一种具体、全球性和可衡量的方式。结论 没有一个国家对下文定义的关于性别与湿地政策和科学的 H 部分准备了全面的答案;相反,各国都提交了独立的内容。对各国答复的分析表明了全面答复的基本要素。在未来 5 年的性别报告中,各国可以选择吸取过去的教训,努力遵守第 XIII.18 号决议,并提供有关国家负责人、社区利益相关者、现场解说员、现场管理人员的按性别分列的透明数据以及公平的薪资数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gaps in gender reporting in National Reports of Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (2021–2022)
Context

The Ramsar Convention is the world’s premier environmental treaty for wetlands. This perspective evaluates gender reporting in Ramsar Convention National Reports and compliance with Gender and Wetlands Resolution XIII.18. A total of 71.8% (n = 42) of the sampled nation reports (n = 133) did not submit National Reports. Zero nations provided statistics on equitable pay or pay gaps by gender. In the sampled reports, only 10 nations submitted sex-disaggregated data. Further, only 7.5% (n = 123) of the sampled National Reports (n = 133) provided sex-disaggregated gender data relevant to the Ramsar Convention. Fifteen National Reports deleted the question on gender (Section H) on from their report entirely, including Denmark and Germany. With evidence drawn from the submitted National Reports, this perspective provides concrete empirical suggestions for improving gender reporting in the future. Gender initiatives, including Resolution XIII.18 and the related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have improved transparent gender reporting in the Ramsar Convention National Reports to a degree. However, on the basis of this review, there is room for improvement in national reporting.

Methods

National Reports from 2021 to 2022 were reviewed for all instances of ‘gender’ and then evaluated for national replies to Section H, focused on gender.

Key results

Five years after Resolution XIII.18, there is still a need for system-wide improvements in gender reporting, including sex-disaggregated data, and equity for women (cis and trans) for the Ramsar Convention to become compliant with Resolution XIII.18. Complying with Resolution XIII.18 is one concrete, global and measurable way for wetland science and policy to mainstream gender.

Conclusions

No nation has prepared a comprehensive answer to Section H on gender and wetland policy and science, as defined below; instead, nations have submitted discrete elements. The analysis of each nation’s answers showed essential elements for a comprehensive answer. In the next 5 years of gender reporting, nations have the option to learn from the past and strive to comply with Resolution XIII.18 and provide transparent sex-disaggregated data on National Heads, community stakeholders, site interpreters, site managers and equitable salary data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine and Freshwater Research
Marine and Freshwater Research 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
76
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Marine and Freshwater Research is an international and interdisciplinary journal publishing contributions on all aquatic environments. The journal’s content addresses broad conceptual questions and investigations about the ecology and management of aquatic environments. Environments range from groundwaters, wetlands and streams to estuaries, rocky shores, reefs and the open ocean. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: aquatic ecosystem processes, such as nutrient cycling; biology; ecology; biogeochemistry; biogeography and phylogeography; hydrology; limnology; oceanography; toxicology; conservation and management; and ecosystem services. Contributions that are interdisciplinary and of wide interest and consider the social-ecological and institutional issues associated with managing marine and freshwater ecosystems are welcomed. Marine and Freshwater Research is a valuable resource for researchers in industry and academia, resource managers, environmental consultants, students and amateurs who are interested in any aspect of the aquatic sciences. Marine and Freshwater Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
期刊最新文献
Are tuna always hungry? A deep dive into stomach-fullness measures in the western and central Pacific Ocean The implications of brief floodplain inundation for local and landscape-scale ecosystem function in an intermittent Australian river A comprehensive review of South Australia’s Great Artesian Basin spring and discharge wetlands biota Changes in the fish assemblages along the Busselton Jetty, and a comparison with natural habitats The role of environmental factors on beta diversity of periphytic algae in a tropical reservoir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1